Literature DB >> 33747667

Non-linearity of Skin Properties in Electrotactile Applications: Identification and Mitigation.

Mehdi Rahimi1, Fang Jiang2, Yantao Shen1.   

Abstract

Electrotactile displays can open a new sensory substitution channel to be utilized in a vast array of applications. Our Finger-Eye research used this approach to build a system for the blind to easily read any text not written in Braille. But there are still challenges in different aspects of such systems. One of the most crucial concerns, is the effects of receptor fatigue. Our tests show that during prolonged exposure of receptors to the electrical signals, their sensitivity to the signal level changes gradually and adjustments in the signal's power are required to keep the receptors is the stimulated state. This was confirmed by monitoring the electrical current passing through the skin and calculating the corresponding impedance. More interestingly, the rates of the impedance changes are different for each part of the skin, indicating inconsistent rates of receptor fatigue for each region of the skin. These electrical properties of the skin were addressed in this research for the purpose of rendering consistent sensations for the users regardless of the person or skin conditions. To solve these challenges, two methods are employed: a voltage control system based on pulse-width modulation is used to adjust the signal power; and Kalman filtering is used to predict impedance changes in advance and supply the skin with the proper signal. The result is a self-contained automated system capable of managing the signal power for any user at any given time or skin condition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive Impedance Mapping; Electrical Stimulation; Electrostimuli; Electrotactile Display; Kalman Filter; Sensory Substitution; Skin Electrical Properties

Year:  2019        PMID: 33747667      PMCID: PMC7970715          DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2955648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Access        ISSN: 2169-3536            Impact factor:   3.367


  15 in total

1.  Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems.

Authors:  K A Kaczmarek; J G Webster; P Bach-y-Rita; W J Tompkins
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Cross-modal plasticity revealed by electrotactile stimulation of the tongue in the congenitally blind.

Authors:  Maurice Ptito; Solvej M Moesgaard; Albert Gjedde; Ron Kupers
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Electrotactile perception of scatterplots on the fingertips and abdomen.

Authors:  S J Haase; K A Kaczmarek
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 4.  Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks.

Authors:  Roland S Johansson; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Interaction of Perceived Frequency and Intensity in Fingertip Electrotactile Stimulation: Dissimilarity Ratings and Multidimensional Scaling.

Authors:  Kurt A Kaczmarek; Mitchell E Tyler; Uchechukwu O Okpara; Steven J Haase
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Lingual electrotactile stimulation as an alternative sensory feedback pathway for brain-computer interface applications.

Authors:  J Adam Wilson; Léo M Walton; Mitch Tyler; Justin Williams
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Electrotactile Display with Real-Time Impedance Feedback Using Pulse Width Modulation.

Authors:  H Kajimoto
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.487

8.  Vibrotactile and electrotactile perception of time-varying pulse trains.

Authors:  I R Summers; P R Dixon; P G Cooper; D A Gratton; B H Brown; J C Stevens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Electrotactile two-point discrimination as a function of frequency, body site, laterality, and stimulation codes.

Authors:  M Solomonow; J Lyman; A Freedy
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Perceived Intensity and Discrimination Ability for Lingual Electrotactile Stimulation Depends on Location and Orientation of Electrodes.

Authors:  Joel Moritz; Philip Turk; John D Williams; Leslie M Stone-Roy
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.