BACKGROUND/AIM: To compare the pregnancy outcome of singletons conceived after transfer of cryopreserved and thawed embryos (frozen embryo transfer [FET]) to singletons conceived after fresh embryo transfer (fresh ET) and natural conceived singletons. METHODS: Using a retrospective data analysis on a study population consisting of 1,261 singletons born after FET and 2,519 singletons born after fresh ET between 2006 and 2015. The control group consisted of singletons born after natural conception. Main outcome measures consisted of birth weight (in grams), gestational age, preterm birth (<37 weeks of gestation), being large for gestational age (LGA, above 90th weight percentile adjusted for gestational age) and Apgar scores. RESULTS: Babies born after FET had an increased risk of high birth weight (adjusted OR [AOR]) 2.92; 1.503-3.482) and being LGA (AOR fresh ET vs. FET 1.47; 1.210-1.787) compared to singletons born after fresh ET, as well as higher birth weights compared to natural conceived children. CONCLUSIONS: Singletons born after FET have a higher risk of high birth weight and being LGA compared to singletons after fresh ET and compared to natural conceived singletons. We assume that the freezing process might be the underlying cause.
BACKGROUND/AIM: To compare the pregnancy outcome of singletons conceived after transfer of cryopreserved and thawed embryos (frozen embryo transfer [FET]) to singletons conceived after fresh embryo transfer (fresh ET) and natural conceived singletons. METHODS: Using a retrospective data analysis on a study population consisting of 1,261 singletons born after FET and 2,519 singletons born after fresh ET between 2006 and 2015. The control group consisted of singletons born after natural conception. Main outcome measures consisted of birth weight (in grams), gestational age, preterm birth (<37 weeks of gestation), being large for gestational age (LGA, above 90th weight percentile adjusted for gestational age) and Apgar scores. RESULTS:Babies born after FET had an increased risk of high birth weight (adjusted OR [AOR]) 2.92; 1.503-3.482) and being LGA (AOR fresh ET vs. FET 1.47; 1.210-1.787) compared to singletons born after fresh ET, as well as higher birth weights compared to natural conceived children. CONCLUSIONS: Singletons born after FET have a higher risk of high birth weight and being LGA compared to singletons after fresh ET and compared to natural conceived singletons. We assume that the freezing process might be the underlying cause.
Authors: D De Neubourg; J Gerris; K Mangelschots; E Van Royen; M Vercruyssen; A Steylemans; M Elseviers Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2006-01-20 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Amber R Cooper; Kathleen E O'Neill; Jenifer E Allsworth; Emily S Jungheim; Anthony O Odibo; Diana L Gray; Valerie S Ratts; Kelle H Moley; Randall R Odem Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2011-09-25 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Ann Thurin; Jon Hausken; Torbjörn Hillensjö; Barbara Jablonowska; Anja Pinborg; Annika Strandell; Christina Bergh Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-12-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Manon Ceelen; Mirjam M van Weissenbruch; Jan C Roos; Jan P W Vermeiden; Flora E van Leeuwen; Henriette A Delemarre-van de Waal Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2007-06-26 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Manon Ceelen; Mirjam M van Weissenbruch; Janneke Prein; Judith J Smit; Jan P W Vermeiden; Marieke Spreeuwenberg; Flora E van Leeuwen; Henriette A Delemarre-van de Waal Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2009-08-01 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Laura Rienzi; Clarisa Gracia; Roberta Maggiulli; Andrew R LaBarbera; Daniel J Kaser; Filippo M Ubaldi; Sheryl Vanderpoel; Catherine Racowsky Journal: Hum Reprod Update Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 15.610
Authors: Frauke von Versen-Höynck; Sebastian Häckl; Elif Seda Selamet Tierney; Kirk P Conrad; Valerie L Baker; Virginia D Winn Journal: Hypertension Date: 2019-12-16 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Eleonora Rubini; Katinka M Snoek; Sam Schoenmakers; Sten P Willemsen; Kevin D Sinclair; Melek Rousian; Régine P M Steegers-Theunissen Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Kjersti Westvik-Johari; Liv Bente Romundstad; Deborah A Lawlor; Christina Bergh; Mika Gissler; Anna-Karina A Henningsen; Siri E Håberg; Ulla-Britt Wennerholm; Aila Tiitinen; Anja Pinborg; Signe Opdahl Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2021-06-25 Impact factor: 11.069