OBJECTIVE: To determine whether fetal size differences exist between matched fertile and infertile women and among women with infertility achieving pregnancy through various treatment modalities. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with propensity score analysis. SETTING: Tertiary care center and affiliated community hospitals. PATIENT(S): 1,246 fertile and 461 infertile healthy women with singleton livebirths over a 10-year period. INTERVENTION(S): Infertile women conceiving without medical assistance, with ovulation induction, or with in vitro fertilization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Birthweight; secondary outcomes included crown-rump length, second-trimester estimated fetal weight, and incidence of low birth weight and preterm delivery. RESULT(S): Compared with matched fertile women, infertile women had smaller neonates at birth (3,375 ± 21 vs. 3,231 ± 21 g) and more low-birth-weight infants (relative risk = 1.68, 95% confidence interval, 1.06, 2.67). Neonates conceived via ovulation induction were the smallest among the infertility subgroups compared with the neonates of fertile women (3,092 ± 46 vs. 3,397 ± 44 g). First-trimester fetal size was smaller in infertile versus fertile women (crown-rump length 7.9 ± 0.1 vs. 8.5 ± 0.1 mm). Within the infertility subgroups, no differences in fetal or neonatal size were found. CONCLUSION(S): The inherent pathologic processes associated with infertility may have a larger impact on fetal growth than infertility therapies.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether fetal size differences exist between matched fertile and infertile women and among women with infertility achieving pregnancy through various treatment modalities. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with propensity score analysis. SETTING: Tertiary care center and affiliated community hospitals. PATIENT(S): 1,246 fertile and 461 infertile healthy women with singleton livebirths over a 10-year period. INTERVENTION(S): Infertile women conceiving without medical assistance, with ovulation induction, or with in vitro fertilization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Birthweight; secondary outcomes included crown-rump length, second-trimester estimated fetal weight, and incidence of low birth weight and preterm delivery. RESULT(S): Compared with matched fertile women, infertile women had smaller neonates at birth (3,375 ± 21 vs. 3,231 ± 21 g) and more low-birth-weight infants (relative risk = 1.68, 95% confidence interval, 1.06, 2.67). Neonates conceived via ovulation induction were the smallest among the infertility subgroups compared with the neonates of fertile women (3,092 ± 46 vs. 3,397 ± 44 g). First-trimester fetal size was smaller in infertile versus fertilewomen (crown-rump length 7.9 ± 0.1 vs. 8.5 ± 0.1 mm). Within the infertility subgroups, no differences in fetal or neonatal size were found. CONCLUSION(S): The inherent pathologic processes associated with infertility may have a larger impact on fetal growth than infertility therapies.
Authors: Peter G McGovern; Amaury J Llorens; Joan H Skurnick; Gerson Weiss; Laura T Goldsmith Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: A C Ravelli; J H van der Meulen; R P Michels; C Osmond; D J Barker; C N Hales; O P Bleker Journal: Lancet Date: 1998-01-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Barbara Luke; Judy E Stern; Milton Kotelchuck; Eugene R Declercq; Bruce Cohen; Hafsatou Diop Journal: J Reprod Med Date: 2015 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 0.142
Authors: Barbara Luke; Judy E Stern; Mark D Hornstein; Milton Kotelchuck; Hafsatou Diop; Howard Cabral; Eugene R Declercq Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2015-12-03 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Kathleen E O'Neill; Methodius Tuuli; Anthony O Odibo; Randall R Odem; Amber Cooper Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2013-11-09 Impact factor: 7.329