Literature DB >> 16428333

The obstetrical and neonatal outcome of babies born after single-embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI compares favourably to spontaneously conceived babies.

D De Neubourg1, J Gerris, K Mangelschots, E Van Royen, M Vercruyssen, A Steylemans, M Elseviers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, concern has risen about poor obstetrical and neonatal outcome of singletons after IVF/ICSI. Because the population of patients receiving single-embryo transfer (SET) resulting in singleton pregnancies is different from the one that would have become pregnant (with a singleton) before SET was introduced, we wanted to investigate whether the outcome of singleton pregnancies after SET differed from spontaneously conceived singletons.
METHODS: The obstetrical and early neonatal outcome of all pregnancies originating from SET after IVF/ICSI procedures between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2003, was prospectively collected and analyzed.
RESULTS: Data from 251 singleton pregnancies and births after SET were analyzed and compared to data from 59,535 spontaneously conceived singletons retrieved from the Centre for Perinatal Epidemiology. The mean birthweight of the singletons after SET was 3322 g (+/-538 SD) versus 3330 g (+/-531 SD) for the spontaneously conceived singletons (P = 0.82). The mean gestational age was 38.7 weeks (+/-1.9 SD) for SET and 38.9 weeks (+/-1.8 SD) for spontaneously conceived singletons (P = 0.06). The proportion of very preterm birth (<32 weeks) was 0.8% in each group, and the proportion of preterm birth (<37 weeks) was 10.0% for SET singletons and 6.24% for spontaneous singletons (P = 0.03). However, mean birthweight of very preterm, preterm and term SET singleton babies was similar to the mean birthweight in every category of gestational age in the spontaneous conceived control group. Stillbirth was 0.4% for both populations (P = 0.99).
CONCLUSIONS: Good prognosis patients, in whom SET is applied, do not only have a higher chance of conception but do not have an unfavourable outcome of their singleton baby when compared to spontaneous singletons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16428333     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dei424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  14 in total

1.  Initial maternal serum human chorionic gonadotropin levels in pregnancies achieved after assisted reproductive technology are higher after preimplantation genetic screening and after frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort.

Authors:  Elie Hobeika; Sonali Singh; Shaveta Malik; Eric S Knochenhauer; Michael L Traub
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes after assisted reproduction: a comparative study.

Authors:  C Allen; S Bowdin; R F Harrison; A G Sutcliffe; L Brueton; G Kirby; J Kirkman-Brown; C Barrett; W Reardon; E Maher
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Effect of single embryo transfer on the risk of preterm birth associated with in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Adam J Fechner; Kelecia R Brown; Ndidiamaka Onwubalili; Sangita K Jindal; Gerson Weiss; Laura T Goldsmith; Peter G McGovern
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Fresh and Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Compared to Natural Conception: Differences in Perinatal Outcome.

Authors:  Suzanne Spijkers; Jan Willem Lens; Roel Schats; Cornelis B Lambalk
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Single vitrified blastocyst transfer maximizes liveborn children per embryo while minimizing preterm birth.

Authors:  Kate Devine; Matthew T Connell; Kevin S Richter; Christina I Ramirez; Eric D Levens; Alan H DeCherney; Robert J Stillman; Eric A Widra
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Outcomes for women and infants following assisted conception: implications for perinatal education, care, and support.

Authors:  Margaret Barnes; Anne Roiko; Rachel Reed; Cath Williams; Kerry Willcocks
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2012

Review 7.  In Vitro fertilization and adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes.

Authors:  Chantae S Sullivan-Pyke; Suneeta Senapati; Monica A Mainigi; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.300

8.  The INeS study: prevention of multiple pregnancies: a randomised controlled trial comparing IUI COH versus IVF e SET versus MNC IVF in couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility.

Authors:  Alexandra J Bensdorp; Els Slappendel; Carolien Koks; Jur Oosterhuis; Annemieke Hoek; Peter Hompes; Frank Broekmans; Harold Verhoeve; Jan Peter de Bruin; Janne Meije van Weert; Maaike Traas; Jacques Maas; Nicole Beckers; Sjoerd Repping; Ben W Mol; Fulco van der Veen; Madelon van Wely
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.809

9.  The prevalence of chromosomal deletions relating to developmental delay and/or intellectual disability in human euploid blastocysts.

Authors:  Wenyin He; Xiaofang Sun; Lian Liu; Man Li; Hua Jin; Wei-Hua Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Do intrauterine or genetic influences explain the foetal origins of chronic disease? A novel experimental method for disentangling effects.

Authors:  Anita Thapar; Gordon Harold; Frances Rice; XiaoJia Ge; Jacky Boivin; Dale Hay; Marianne van den Bree; Allyson Lewis
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.