Literature DB >> 22611174

Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shilpi Pandey1, Ashalatha Shetty, Mark Hamilton, Siladitya Bhattacharya, Abha Maheshwari.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Earlier reviews have suggested that IVF/ICSI pregnancies are associated with higher risks. However, there have been recent advances in the way IVF/ICSI is done, leading to some controversy as to whether IVF/ICSI singletons are associated with higher perinatal risks. The objective of this systematic review was to provide an up-to-date comparison of obstetric and perinatal outcomes of the singletons born after IVF/ICSI and compare them with those of spontaneous conceptions.
METHODS: Extensive searches were done by two authors. The protocol was agreed a priori. PRISMA guidance was followed. The data were extracted in 2 × 2 tables. Risk ratio and risk difference were calculated on pooled data using Rev Man 5.1. Quality assessment of studies was performed using Critical Appraisal Skills programme. Sensitivity analysis was performed when the heterogeneity was high (I(2) > 50%).
RESULTS: There were 20 matched cohort studies and 10 unmatched cohort studies included in this review. IVF/ICSI singleton pregnancies were associated with a higher risk (95% confidence interval) of ante-partum haemorrhage (2.49, 2.30-2.69), congenital anomalies (1.67, 1.33-2.09), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (1.49, 1.39-1.59), preterm rupture of membranes (1.16, 1.07-1.26), Caesarean section (1.56, 1.51-1.60), low birthweight (1.65, 1.56-1.75), perinatal mortality (1.87, 1.48-2.37), preterm delivery (1.54, 1.47-1.62), gestational diabetes (1.48, 1.33-1.66), induction of labour (1.18, 1.10-1.28) and small for gestational age (1.39, 1.27-1.53).
CONCLUSIONS: Singletons pregnancies after IVF/ICSI are associated with higher risks of obstetric and perinatal complications when compared with spontaneous conception. Further research is needed to determine which aspect of assisted reproduction technology poses most risk and how this risk can be minimized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22611174     DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dms018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod Update        ISSN: 1355-4786            Impact factor:   15.610


  161 in total

1.  Developmental Origins of Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Edwina H Yeung; Candace Robledo; Nansi Boghossian; Cuilin Zhang; Pauline Mendola
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2014-03-01

2.  The cumulative effect of assisted reproduction procedures on placental development and epigenetic perturbations in a mouse model.

Authors:  Eric de Waal; Lisa A Vrooman; Erin Fischer; Teri Ord; Monica A Mainigi; Christos Coutifaris; Richard M Schultz; Marisa S Bartolomei
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 3.  Caesarean Delivery Rate Review: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors:  N Degani; N Sikich
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2015-03-01

4.  Initial maternal serum human chorionic gonadotropin levels in pregnancies achieved after assisted reproductive technology are higher after preimplantation genetic screening and after frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort.

Authors:  Elie Hobeika; Sonali Singh; Shaveta Malik; Eric S Knochenhauer; Michael L Traub
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Early Autism Spectrum Disorders in Children Born to Fertile, Subfertile, and ART-Treated Women.

Authors:  Hafsatou Diop; Howard Cabral; Daksha Gopal; Xiaohui Cui; Judy E Stern; Milton Kotelchuck
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2019-11

6.  Assisted Reproductive Technology and Early Intervention Program Enrollment.

Authors:  Hafsatou Diop; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Candice Belanoff; Eugene R Declercq; Milton Kotelchuck; Barbara Luke; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Public health implications of a North American publicly funded in vitro fertilization program; lessons to learn.

Authors:  Talya Shaulov; Serge Belisle; Michael H Dahan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Perinatal outcomes in multifetal pregnancy following fetal reduction.

Authors:  Neda Razaz; Tehila Avitan; Joseph Ting; Tracy Pressey; K S Joseph
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Effect of embryo and blastocyst transfer on the birthweight of live-born singletons from FET cycles.

Authors:  Junshun Fang; Lihua Zhu; Dong Li; Zhipeng Xu; Guijun Yan; Haixiang Sun; Ningyuan Zhang; Linjun Chen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Factors associated with short interpregnancy interval among women treated with in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  S Amrane; M B Brown; R A Lobo; B Luke
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.