Cara M Murphy1, James MacKillop1,2, Rosemarie A Martin1, Jennifer W Tidey1, Suzanne M Colby1, Damaris J Rohsenow3,4. 1. Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Box S121, Providence, RI, 02912, USA. 2. Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, McMaster University/St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 3. Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Box S121, Providence, RI, 02912, USA. Damaris_Rohsenow@Brown.edu. 4. Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI, 02908, USA. Damaris_Rohsenow@Brown.edu.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Cigarette demand is a behavioral economic measure of the relative value of cigarettes. Decreasing the value of cigarette reinforcement may help with quitting smoking. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of initial use of varenicline (VAR) versus nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) on demand for cigarettes on quit day among smokers with substance use disorders (SUD) and to determine whether reduced demand was associated with subsequent abstinence from smoking at 1 and 3 months. METHODS:Participants (N = 110) were randomized to double-blind, double-placebo conditions: VAR with placebo NRT or NRT with placebo capsules. The cigarette purchase task (CPT) was used to assess demand for cigarettes at baseline and on quit day, following a 1-week medication dose run-up/placebo capsule lead-in and first day use of the patch. RESULTS: Demand for cigarettes decreased from baseline to quit day without significant differences between medications. Reductions in CPT intensity (number of cigarettes that would be smoked if they were free) and CPT breakpoint (lowest price at which no cigarettes would be purchased) predicted greater likelihood of abstaining on quit day. Reduced intensity predicted length of abstinence at 1 and 3 months while reduced breakpoint predicted only 1 month length of abstinence. CONCLUSIONS: Initial therapeutic doses of VAR and NRT resulted in similar reductions in cigarette reinforcement. Larger initial reductions in demand on quit day were associated with early success with abstaining from cigarettes. Behavioral economic approaches may be useful for identifying individuals who benefit less from pharmacotherapy and may need additional treatment resources. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00756275.
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: Cigarette demand is a behavioral economic measure of the relative value of cigarettes. Decreasing the value of cigarette reinforcement may help with quitting smoking. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of initial use of varenicline (VAR) versus nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) on demand for cigarettes on quit day among smokers with substance use disorders (SUD) and to determine whether reduced demand was associated with subsequent abstinence from smoking at 1 and 3 months. METHODS:Participants (N = 110) were randomized to double-blind, double-placebo conditions: VAR with placebo NRT or NRT with placebo capsules. The cigarette purchase task (CPT) was used to assess demand for cigarettes at baseline and on quit day, following a 1-week medication dose run-up/placebo capsule lead-in and first day use of the patch. RESULTS: Demand for cigarettes decreased from baseline to quit day without significant differences between medications. Reductions in CPT intensity (number of cigarettes that would be smoked if they were free) and CPT breakpoint (lowest price at which no cigarettes would be purchased) predicted greater likelihood of abstaining on quit day. Reduced intensity predicted length of abstinence at 1 and 3 months while reduced breakpoint predicted only 1 month length of abstinence. CONCLUSIONS: Initial therapeutic doses of VAR and NRT resulted in similar reductions in cigarette reinforcement. Larger initial reductions in demand on quit day were associated with early success with abstaining from cigarettes. Behavioral economic approaches may be useful for identifying individuals who benefit less from pharmacotherapy and may need additional treatment resources. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00756275.
Authors: James MacKillop; James G Murphy; Lara A Ray; Daniel T A Eisenberg; Stephen A Lisman; J Koji Lum; David S Wilson Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Tracy T Smith; Rachel N Cassidy; Jennifer W Tidey; Xianghua Luo; Chap T Le; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Eric C Donny Journal: Addiction Date: 2016-11-28 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Nicolas J Schlienz; Larry W Hawk; Stephen T Tiffany; Richard J O'Connor; Martin C Mahoney Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2014-05-28 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Robert M Anthenelli; Neal L Benowitz; Robert West; Lisa St Aubin; Thomas McRae; David Lawrence; John Ascher; Cristina Russ; Alok Krishen; A Eden Evins Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-04-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Cara M Murphy; Rachel N Cassidy; Rosemarie A Martin; Jennifer W Tidey; James Mackillop; Damaris J Rohsenow Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2019-03-21 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Ivori Zvorsky; Tyler D Nighbor; Allison N Kurti; Michael DeSarno; Gideon Naudé; Derek D Reed; Stephen T Higgins Journal: Prev Med Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Tyler D Nighbor; Ivori Zvorsky; Allison N Kurti; Joan M Skelly; Warren K Bickel; Derek D Reed; Gideon P Naudé; Stephen T Higgins Journal: J Exp Anal Behav Date: 2019-01-25 Impact factor: 2.468
Authors: Joshua L Karelitz; Erin A McClure; Caitlin Wolford-Clevenger; Lauren R Pacek; Karen L Cropsey Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2021-02-03 Impact factor: 4.492