Nicolas J Schlienz1, Larry W Hawk2, Stephen T Tiffany3, Richard J O'Connor4, Martin C Mahoney4. 1. Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States. Electronic address: schlienz@buffalo.edu. 2. Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States; Center for Children and Families, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States. 3. Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States. 4. Departments of Medicine and Health Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Varenicline was developed to aid smoking cessation by reducing smoking reinforcement. The present study tests this reinforcement-reduction hypothesis among smokers preparing to quit. METHOD: After a one-week baseline, treatment-seeking smokers were randomized to receive three weeks of varenicline or placebo (Weeks 2-4). During each of the four weeks of the study, smokers completed a hypothetical cigarette purchase task (CPT) via handheld devices in their natural environment. Behavioral economic measures of simulated smoking if cigarettes were free (demand intensity), sensitivity of consumption to increasing price (elasticity), and price at which purchases would drop to 0 (breakpoint) were estimated. RESULTS: The exponential demand equation fit the purchase task data well across subjects and time. As predicted, demand intensity decreased and sensitivity to price (elasticity) increased over time. However, changes in demand intensity did not differ by treatment group. Contrary to our hypothesis that varenicline would increase sensitivity to price, the placebo group tended to become more elastic in their purchases during Weeks 2 and 3; the groups did not differ in elasticity at Week 4. Breakpoint did not vary by group, time, or their interaction. CONCLUSION: Simulated smoking demand can be validly assessed in the natural environment of treatment-seeking smokers. Simulated demand indices of smoking reinforcement diminished as smokers approached their target quit date. However, there was no evidence that varenicline facilitated these changes over a three-week period, leaving open the mechanisms by which varenicline reduces smoking rate prior to cessation and improves long-term abstinence.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Varenicline was developed to aid smoking cessation by reducing smoking reinforcement. The present study tests this reinforcement-reduction hypothesis among smokers preparing to quit. METHOD: After a one-week baseline, treatment-seeking smokers were randomized to receive three weeks of varenicline or placebo (Weeks 2-4). During each of the four weeks of the study, smokers completed a hypothetical cigarette purchase task (CPT) via handheld devices in their natural environment. Behavioral economic measures of simulated smoking if cigarettes were free (demand intensity), sensitivity of consumption to increasing price (elasticity), and price at which purchases would drop to 0 (breakpoint) were estimated. RESULTS: The exponential demand equation fit the purchase task data well across subjects and time. As predicted, demand intensity decreased and sensitivity to price (elasticity) increased over time. However, changes in demand intensity did not differ by treatment group. Contrary to our hypothesis that varenicline would increase sensitivity to price, the placebo group tended to become more elastic in their purchases during Weeks 2 and 3; the groups did not differ in elasticity at Week 4. Breakpoint did not vary by group, time, or their interaction. CONCLUSION: Simulated smoking demand can be validly assessed in the natural environment of treatment-seeking smokers. Simulated demand indices of smoking reinforcement diminished as smokers approached their target quit date. However, there was no evidence that varenicline facilitated these changes over a three-week period, leaving open the mechanisms by which varenicline reduces smoking rate prior to cessation and improves long-term abstinence.
Authors: L W Hawk; R L Ashare; S F Lohnes; N J Schlienz; J D Rhodes; S T Tiffany; J C Gass; K M Cummings; M C Mahoney Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2011-11-30 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Lisa M Fucito; Benjamin A Toll; Ran Wu; Denise M Romano; Ece Tek; Stephanie S O'Malley Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2011-01-11 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: James G Murphy; James MacKillop; Jennifer W Tidey; Linda A Brazil; Suzanne M Colby Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2010-09-15 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Thomas H Brandon; David J Drobes; Marina Unrod; Bryan W Heckman; Jason A Oliver; Richard C Roetzheim; Sloan Beth Karver; Brent J Small Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2011-05-11 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Melissa E Levin; Matthew T Weaver; Matthew I Palmatier; Anthony R Caggiula; Alan F Sved; Eric C Donny Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2011-10-12 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Cara M Murphy; James MacKillop; Rosemarie A Martin; Jennifer W Tidey; Suzanne M Colby; Damaris J Rohsenow Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2017-05-13 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Stephen T Higgins; Derek D Reed; Ryan Redner; Joan M Skelly; Ivori A Zvorsky; Allison N Kurti Journal: J Exp Anal Behav Date: 2016-12-21 Impact factor: 2.468
Authors: Stephen T Higgins; Michael DeSarno; Danielle R Davis; Tyler Nighbor; Joanna M Streck; Shana Adise; Roxanne Harfmann; Riley Nesheim-Case; Catherine Markesich; Derek Reed; Rachel F Tyndale; Diann E Gaalema; Sarah H Heil; Stacey C Sigmon; Jennifer W Tidey; Andrea C Villanti; Dustin Lee; John R Hughes; Janice Y Bunn Journal: Prev Med Date: 2020-07-03 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Ivori Zvorsky; Tyler D Nighbor; Allison N Kurti; Michael DeSarno; Gideon Naudé; Derek D Reed; Stephen T Higgins Journal: Prev Med Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Schuyler C Lawson; Julie C Gass; Robert K Cooper; Sarah S Tonkin; Craig R Colder; Martin C Mahoney; Stephen T Tiffany; Larry W Hawk Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2020-11-21 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Richard J O'Connor; Bryan W Heckman; Sarah E Adkison; Vaughan W Rees; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Warren K Bickel; K Michael Cummings Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2016-04-06 Impact factor: 4.530