Joshua L Karelitz1, Erin A McClure2, Caitlin Wolford-Clevenger3, Lauren R Pacek4, Karen L Cropsey3. 1. Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, 5150 Centre Ave, Suite 4C, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, 5150 Centre Ave, Suite 4C, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA. Electronic address: karelitzjl@upmc.edu. 2. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 67 President St, MSC 861, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA; Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 67 President St, MSC 861, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA. 3. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1670 University Blvd Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA. 4. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, 2068 Erwin Road, Room 3038, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Expired-air carbon monoxide (CO) is commonly used to biochemically verify smoking status. The CO cutoff and CO monitor brand may affect the probability of classifying smokers as abstinent, thus influencing conclusions about the efficacy of cessation trials. No systematic reviews have tested this hypothesis. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis examining whether the likelihood of smoking cessation classification varied due to CO cutoff and monitor brand. METHODS: Eligible studies (k = 122) longitudinally assessed CO-verified cessation in adult smokers in randomized trials. Primary meta-regressions separately assessed differences in quit classification likelihood due to continuous and categorical CO cutoffs (Low, 3-4 parts per million [ppm]; [SRNT] Recommended, 5-6 ppm; Moderate, 7-8 ppm; and High, 9-10 ppm); exploratory analyses compared likelihood outcomes between monitor brands: Bedfont and Vitalograph. RESULTS: The likelihood of quit classification increased 18% with each 1 ppm increase above the lowest cutoff (3 ppm). Odds of classification as quit significantly increased between each cutoff category and High: 261% increase from Low; 162% increase from Recommended; and 150% increase from Moderate. There were no differences in cessation classification between monitor brands. CONCLUSIONS: As expected, higher CO cutoffs were associated with greater likelihood of cessation classification. The lack of CO monitor brand differences may have been due to model-level variance not able to be followed up in the present dataset. Researchers are advised to report outcomes using a range of cutoffs-including the recommended range (5-6 ppm)-and the CO monitor brand/model used. Using higher CO cutoffs significantly increases likelihood of quit classification, possibly artificially elevating treatment strategies.
BACKGROUND: Expired-air carbon monoxide (CO) is commonly used to biochemically verify smoking status. The CO cutoff and CO monitor brand may affect the probability of classifying smokers as abstinent, thus influencing conclusions about the efficacy of cessation trials. No systematic reviews have tested this hypothesis. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis examining whether the likelihood of smoking cessation classification varied due to CO cutoff and monitor brand. METHODS: Eligible studies (k = 122) longitudinally assessed CO-verified cessation in adult smokers in randomized trials. Primary meta-regressions separately assessed differences in quit classification likelihood due to continuous and categorical CO cutoffs (Low, 3-4 parts per million [ppm]; [SRNT] Recommended, 5-6 ppm; Moderate, 7-8 ppm; and High, 9-10 ppm); exploratory analyses compared likelihood outcomes between monitor brands: Bedfont and Vitalograph. RESULTS: The likelihood of quit classification increased 18% with each 1 ppm increase above the lowest cutoff (3 ppm). Odds of classification as quit significantly increased between each cutoff category and High: 261% increase from Low; 162% increase from Recommended; and 150% increase from Moderate. There were no differences in cessation classification between monitor brands. CONCLUSIONS: As expected, higher CO cutoffs were associated with greater likelihood of cessation classification. The lack of CO monitor brand differences may have been due to model-level variance not able to be followed up in the present dataset. Researchers are advised to report outcomes using a range of cutoffs-including the recommended range (5-6 ppm)-and the CO monitor brand/model used. Using higher CO cutoffs significantly increases likelihood of quit classification, possibly artificially elevating treatment strategies.
Authors: Donald P Tashkin; Stephen Rennard; J Taylor Hays; Wendy Ma; David Lawrence; Theodore C Lee Journal: Chest Date: 2010-09-23 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Maria P Garcia-Portilla; Leticia Garcia-Alvarez; Fernando Sarramea; Gonzalo Galvan; Eva Diaz-Mesa; Teresa Bobes-Bascaran; Susana Al-Halabi; Edorta Elizagarate; Celso Iglesias; Pilar A Saiz Martínez; Julio Bobes Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2016-05-26 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: K N Roy Chengappa; Kenneth A Perkins; Jaspreet S Brar; Patricia J Schlicht; Scott R Turkin; Michelle L Hetrick; Michele D Levine; Tony P George Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 4.384