Elizabeth R Aston1, Jacqueline E Smith2, Angelo M DiBello3, Samantha G Farris4. 1. Brown University School of Public Health, Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Providence, RI USA. Electronic address: Elizabeth_Aston@Brown.edu. 2. Brown University School of Public Health, Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Providence, RI USA. 3. Brown University School of Public Health, Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Providence, RI USA; City University of New York (CUNY), Brooklyn College, Brooklyn, NY USA. 4. Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Cigarette demand, or relative value, can be assessed via analysis of performance on a hypothetical behavioral economic cigarette purchase task (CPT). Substance purchase tasks are highly amenable to manipulation, namely, external stimuli, instructional changes, or acute stressors. In this regard, the current secondary analysis evaluates the role a novel, computerized stress induction paradigm, the Contextual-Frustration Intolerance Typing Task (C-FiTT), plays in eliciting varying levels of stress and resulting demand. METHOD: Daily smokers (n = 484) completed the C-FiTT wherein they were randomly assigned to one of five distress conditions: combination of task difficulty (low or high difficulty) with neutral or withdrawal cues, and a neutral control group. Tobacco demand was assessed immediately following the distress task using the hypothetical CPT. RESULTS: The C-FiTT distress-induction task significantly increased key cigarette demand indices, including price at maximum expenditure (Pmax) and first price where consumption was suppressed to zero (breakpoint). Moreover, demand increased with severity of C-FiTT condition, with the high-difficulty condition resulting in significantly higher breakpoint and Pmax, compared to other conditions. C-FiTT condition was not related to a significant increase in Omax, intensity, or elasticity. DISCUSSION: The novel C-FiTT paradigm produced comparable effects on tobacco demand relative to in vivo withdrawal induction, indicating that the C-FiTT is a viable procedure by which to influence demand. Reduction of internal and external stressors may be effective in lowering motivation for tobacco. These results highlight the importance of state distress in tobacco demand, and offer a potential avenue for intervention.
INTRODUCTION: Cigarette demand, or relative value, can be assessed via analysis of performance on a hypothetical behavioral economic cigarette purchase task (CPT). Substance purchase tasks are highly amenable to manipulation, namely, external stimuli, instructional changes, or acute stressors. In this regard, the current secondary analysis evaluates the role a novel, computerized stress induction paradigm, the Contextual-Frustration Intolerance Typing Task (C-FiTT), plays in eliciting varying levels of stress and resulting demand. METHOD: Daily smokers (n = 484) completed the C-FiTT wherein they were randomly assigned to one of five distress conditions: combination of task difficulty (low or high difficulty) with neutral or withdrawal cues, and a neutral control group. Tobacco demand was assessed immediately following the distress task using the hypothetical CPT. RESULTS: The C-FiTT distress-induction task significantly increased key cigarette demand indices, including price at maximum expenditure (Pmax) and first price where consumption was suppressed to zero (breakpoint). Moreover, demand increased with severity of C-FiTT condition, with the high-difficulty condition resulting in significantly higher breakpoint and Pmax, compared to other conditions. C-FiTT condition was not related to a significant increase in Omax, intensity, or elasticity. DISCUSSION: The novel C-FiTT paradigm produced comparable effects on tobacco demand relative to in vivo withdrawal induction, indicating that the C-FiTT is a viable procedure by which to influence demand. Reduction of internal and external stressors may be effective in lowering motivation for tobacco. These results highlight the importance of state distress in tobacco demand, and offer a potential avenue for intervention.
Authors: Carla J Berg; Pamela M Ling; Rashelle B Hayes; Erin Berg; Nikki Nollen; Eric Nehl; Won S Choi; Jasjit S Ahluwalia Journal: Health Educ Res Date: 2011-12-07
Authors: James MacKillop; Courtney L Brown; Monika K Stojek; Cara M Murphy; Lawrence Sweet; Ray S Niaura Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2012-03-13 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Jeffrey S Stein; Mikhail N Koffarnus; Sarah E Snider; Amanda J Quisenberry; Warren K Bickel Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2015-07-06 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Ivori Zvorsky; Tyler D Nighbor; Allison N Kurti; Michael DeSarno; Gideon Naudé; Derek D Reed; Stephen T Higgins Journal: Prev Med Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Samantha G Farris; Elizabeth R Aston; Michael J Zvolensky; Ana M Abrantes; Jane Metrik Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2017-05-23 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Alba González-Roz; Roberto Secades-Villa; Gema Aonso-Diego; Sara Weidberg; José R Fernández-Hermida Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 4.530