Literature DB >> 28498792

Sex Differences in 1-Year Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Veterans Health Administration.

Melissa M Farmer1, Maggie A Stanislawski2, Mary E Plomondon2, Bevanne Bean-Mayberry1,3, Nataria T Joseph4, Lauren E Thompson5,6, Jessica L Zuchowski1, Stacie L Daugherty5,6, Elizabeth M Yano1,7, P Michael Ho2,5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advancements in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for treating obstructive coronary artery disease have reduced major adverse events, including mortality. Yet, evidence as to whether women and men experience similar outcomes is mixed. The objective was to examine sex differences in 1-year major adverse cardiac outcomes for the national population of patients undergoing PCI at Veterans Health Administration (VA) cardiac catheterization laboratories.
METHODS: All Veterans undergoing PCI at VA hospitals between October 1, 2007 and September 30, 2013 (N = 64,757; Women = 1,040) were included. Cox proportional hazards models compared 1-year postprocedural outcomes [rehospitalization for myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)] by sex.
RESULTS: Women Veterans undergoing PCI were more likely to be younger, black, obese, and have chronic depression and less likely to have common cardiovascular risk factors and to have had prior cardiac events than Veteran men. One-year rates for women versus men were 2.1% and 2.5% for rehospitalization (p-value = 0.57); 3.5% and 4.9% for mortality (p-value = 0.14), and 5.4% and 6.9% for MACE (p-value = 0.18). There were no significant sex differences in any of the outcomes in Cox proportional hazards models.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite differences in clinical risk factors at the time of PCI, women and men Veterans treated at VA cardiac catheterization laboratories experienced comparable 1-year rehospitalization for MI, mortality, and MACE post-PCI. These results demonstrated similar 1-year post-PCI outcomes for men and women in a national population of patients who have more comorbidities and mental health issues than the general population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiovascular disease; gender differences; percutaneous coronary intervention; veterans; women

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28498792      PMCID: PMC5651967          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2016.6057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  40 in total

1.  Contemporary outcomes in women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Ali H Al-Fiadh; Nick Andrianopoulos; Omar Farouque; Bryan P Yan; Stephen J Duffy; Kerrie Charter; Surat Tongyoo; Gishel New; Thomas Yip; Angela Brennan; George Proimos; Christopher M Reid; Andrew E Ajani; David J Clark
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Risk-adjusted mortality as an indicator of outcomes: comparison of the Medicare Advantage Program with the Veterans' Health Administration.

Authors:  Alfredo J Selim; Lewis E Kazis; William Rogers; Shirley Qian; James A Rothendler; Austin Lee; Xinhua S Ren; Samuel C Haffer; Russ Mardon; Donald Miller; Avron Spiro; Bernardo J Selim; Benjamin G Fincke
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Gender differences in adverse outcomes after contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention: an analysis from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) percutaneous coronary intervention registry.

Authors:  Claire S Duvernoy; Dean E Smith; Prerana Manohar; Ann Schaefer; Eva Kline-Rogers; David Share; Richard McNamara; Hitinder S Gurm; Mauro Moscucci
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Patient access and 1-year outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention facilities with and without on-site cardiothoracic surgery: insights from the Veterans Affairs (VA) Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (CART) program.

Authors:  Thomas M Maddox; Maggie A Stanislawski; Colin O'Donnell; Mary E Plomondon; Steven M Bradley; P Michael Ho; Thomas T Tsai; Adhir R Shroff; Bernadette Speiser; Robert J Jesse; John S Rumsfeld
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Gender disparities in evidence-based statin therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Salim S Virani; LeChauncy D Woodard; David J Ramsey; Tracy H Urech; Julia M Akeroyd; Tina Shah; Anita Deswal; Biykem Bozkurt; Christie M Ballantyne; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Gender differences in the management and clinical outcome of stable angina.

Authors:  Caroline Daly; Felicity Clemens; Jose L Lopez Sendon; Luigi Tavazzi; Eric Boersma; Nicholas Danchin; Francois Delahaye; Anselm Gitt; Desmond Julian; David Mulcahy; Witold Ruzyllo; Kristian Thygesen; Freek Verheugt; Kim M Fox
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Improved outcomes for women undergoing contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic registry.

Authors:  Alice K Jacobs; Janet M Johnston; Amelia Haviland; Maria Mori Brooks; Sheryl F Kelsey; David R Holmes; David P Faxon; David O Williams; Katherine M Detre
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Short- and long-term outcomes of coronary stenting in women versus men: results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Centers for Medicare & Medicaid services cohort.

Authors:  Monique L Anderson; Eric D Peterson; J Matthew Brennan; Sunil V Rao; David Dai; Kevin J Anstrom; Robert Piana; Andra Popescu; Art Sedrakyan; John C Messenger; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Mortality differences between men and women after percutaneous coronary interventions. A 25-year, single-center experience.

Authors:  Mandeep Singh; Charanjit S Rihal; Bernard J Gersh; Veronique L Roger; Malcolm R Bell; Ryan J Lennon; Amir Lerman; David R Holmes
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Treatment, outcomes, costs, and quality of life of women and men with acute coronary syndromes who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the antiplatelet therapy observational registry.

Authors:  Ameet Bakhai; Jean Ferrières; Stefan James; Andres Iñiguez; Attila Mohácsi; Gregory Pavlides; Mark Belger; Krisi Norrbacka; Magali Sartral
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.840

View more
  3 in total

1.  The implications of cocaine use and associated behaviors on adverse cardiovascular outcomes among veterans: Insights from the VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (CART) Program.

Authors:  Ateka Gunja; Maggie A Stanislawski; Anna E Barón; Thomas M Maddox; Steven M Bradley; Mladen I Vidovich
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-09       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  Effects of Gender-Specific Differences, Inflammatory Response, and Genetic Variation on the Associations Among Depressive Symptoms and the Risk of Major Adverse Coronary Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Jennifer Sanner; Megan L Grove; Erica Yu; F Gerard Moeller; Stanley G Cron; Eric Boerwinkle; Alanna C Morrison; Lorraine Frazier
Journal:  Biol Res Nurs       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.522

Review 3.  Gender difference in clinical outcomes of the patients with coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yaya Guo; Fahui Yin; Chunlei Fan; Zhilu Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.