Literature DB >> 20538357

Contemporary outcomes in women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes.

Ali H Al-Fiadh1, Nick Andrianopoulos, Omar Farouque, Bryan P Yan, Stephen J Duffy, Kerrie Charter, Surat Tongyoo, Gishel New, Thomas Yip, Angela Brennan, George Proimos, Christopher M Reid, Andrew E Ajani, David J Clark.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Uncertainty remains as to whether females benefit as much as males from percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the setting of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
METHODS: We compared 802 women with 2151 men presenting with ACS, undergoing PCI from April 2004 to October 2006 from the Melbourne Interventional Group registry. Clinical characteristics, in-hospital, 30-day and 1-year outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: Women were older (69.6 ± 11.6 vs. 62.17 ± 12.3 years, p<0.001), and had more diabetes (27.1% vs. 19.6%, p<0.001) and hypertension (70.3% vs. 53.9%, p<0.001) than men. Women were less likely to present with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (30.5% vs. 37.9%, p<0.001). Bleeding (3.6% vs. 0.8%, p<0.001) was higher among women. Thirty-day mortality (4.7 vs. 2.4%, p<0.001) and MACE (10.1 vs. 6.4%, p<0.001) were higher in women. Gender was an independent predictor of overall MACE at 30 days (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.04-2.02, p=0.03) but not death. At 12 months, there were no significant differences in mortality (6.4% vs. 4.8%, p=0.09), myocardial infarction (5.5% vs. 5.0%, p=0.64), target vessel revascularization (7.9% vs. 7.0%, p=0.42) and MACE (16.3% vs. 14%, p=0.13) between women and men.
CONCLUSIONS: There is an early hazard amongst women undergoing PCI for ACS, but not at 12 months. These data suggest that gender should not affect the decision to offer PCI but further gender specific studies are warranted.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20538357     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  7 in total

1.  Sex Differences in 1-Year Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Melissa M Farmer; Maggie A Stanislawski; Mary E Plomondon; Bevanne Bean-Mayberry; Nataria T Joseph; Lauren E Thompson; Jessica L Zuchowski; Stacie L Daugherty; Elizabeth M Yano; P Michael Ho
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Sex differences in the treatment and outcome of patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a population-based study.

Authors:  Chen-Fang Lin; Li-Jiuan Shen; Fei-Yuan Hsiao; Churn-Shiouh Gau; Fe-Lin Lin Wu
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Comparison of primary coronary percutaneous coronary intervention between Diabetic Men and Women with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Heng-Liang Liu; Yang Liu; Zhen-Xuan Hao; Guo-Ying Geng; Zhi-Fang Zhang; Song-Bin Jing; Ning Ba; Wei Guo
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

4.  Influence of sex on outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients over 75 years of age with coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Yuqi Liu; Xin Hu; Qiao Xue; Yusheng Zhao; Yu Wang; Lei Gao
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 5.  Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Women: Are There Differences When Compared with Men?

Authors:  Usha Rao; G Louise Buchanan; Angela Hoye
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-05-21

6.  Novel insights into clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in Vietnam.

Authors:  Hoa T T Vu; Hung M Pham; Hoai T T Nguyen; Quang N Nguyen; Loi D Do; Ngoc M Pham; Richard Norman; Rachel R Huxley; Crystal M Y Lee; Christopher M Reid
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2020-09-04

Review 7.  Gender difference in clinical outcomes of the patients with coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yaya Guo; Fahui Yin; Chunlei Fan; Zhilu Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.