Literature DB >> 22988009

Short- and long-term outcomes of coronary stenting in women versus men: results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Centers for Medicare & Medicaid services cohort.

Monique L Anderson1, Eric D Peterson, J Matthew Brennan, Sunil V Rao, David Dai, Kevin J Anstrom, Robert Piana, Andra Popescu, Art Sedrakyan, John C Messenger, Pamela S Douglas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conflicting evidence exists on sex-based outcomes after coronary stenting. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Data on 426 996 patients ≥65 years old (42.3% women) from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry (2004-2008) were linked to Medicare inpatient claims to compare in-hospital outcomes by sex and long-term outcomes by sex and stent type. In-hospital complications were more frequent in women than in men: death (3869 [2.2%] versus 3737 [1.6%]; adjusted odds ratio, 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-1.49), myocardial infarction (2365 [1.3%] versus 2858 [1.2%]; odds ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.11-1.27), bleeding (7860 [4.4%] versus 5627 [2.3%]; odds ratio, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.79-1.93), and vascular complications (2381 [1.3%] versus 1648 [0.7%]; odds ratio, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.73-1.99). At 20.4 months, women had a lower adjusted risk of death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.90-0.94) but similar rates of myocardial infarction, revascularization, and bleeding. Relative to bare metal stent use, drug-eluting stent use was associated with similar improved long-term outcomes in both sexes: death (women: adjusted HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.76-0.81; men: HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.74-0.79), myocardial infarction (women: HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.74-0.84; men: HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.77-0.85), and revascularization (women: HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90-0.97; men: HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.88-0.94). There was no interaction between sex and stent type for long-term outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: In contemporary coronary stenting, women have a slightly higher procedural risk than men but have better long-term survival. In both sexes, use of a drug-eluting stent is associated with lower long-term likelihood for death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22988009     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.111369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  24 in total

1.  Sex Differences in Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention According to Age.

Authors:  Kelly C Epps; Elizabeth M Holper; Faith Selzer; Helen A Vlachos; Sarah K Gualano; J Dawn Abbott; Alice K Jacobs; Oscar C Marroquin; Srihari S Naidu; Peter W Groeneveld; Robert L Wilensky
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2016-02

2.  Sex Differences in 1-Year Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Melissa M Farmer; Maggie A Stanislawski; Mary E Plomondon; Bevanne Bean-Mayberry; Nataria T Joseph; Lauren E Thompson; Jessica L Zuchowski; Stacie L Daugherty; Elizabeth M Yano; P Michael Ho
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Temporal changes in outcomes of women and men undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion: 2005-2013.

Authors:  Aurel Toma; Barbara E Stähli; Michael Gick; Miroslaw Ferenc; Kambis Mashayekhi; Heinz Joachim Buettner; Franz-Josef Neumann; Catherine Gebhard
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  Biopsychosocial health disparities among young women enrolled in cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  Theresa M Beckie; Gerald Fletcher; Maureen W Groer; Kevin E Kip; Ming Ji
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.081

5.  Sex differences in clinical outcomes after rotational atherectomy of calcified coronary stenoses: from multicenter registry.

Authors:  Hisao Otsuki; Kentaro Jujo; Kazuki Tanaka; Iwao Okai; Makoto Nakashima; Tomotaka Dohi; Shinya Okazaki; Ryuta Okabe; Fukuko Nagura; Yugo Nara; Hideyuki Kawashima; Hiroyuki Kyono; Hiroyuki Arashi; Junichi Yamaguchi; Hiroshi Tamura; Takeshi Kurata; Katsumi Miyauchi; Ken Kozuma; Hiroyuki Daida; Nobuhisa Hagiwara
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2021-02-15

Review 6.  Women-specific factors to consider in risk, diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Ronée E Harvey; Kirsten E Coffman; Virginia M Miller
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2015-03

7.  Temporal trends in percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes among older patients in the United States.

Authors:  Sunil V Rao; Connie N Hess; David Dai; Cynthia L Green; Eric D Peterson; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 8.  Disparities in Cardiac Care of Women: Current Data and Possible Solutions.

Authors:  Rosalyn O Adigun; Amber N Boler; Rekha Mankad
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-09-21

Review 9.  Population-level differences in revascularization treatment and outcomes among various United States subpopulations.

Authors:  Garth Graham; Yang-Yu Karen Xiao; Dan Rappoport; Saima Siddiqi
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-26

10.  Sex Differences in Outcomes After Myocardial Infarction in the Community.

Authors:  Rabea Asleh; Sheila M Manemann; Susan A Weston; Suzette J Bielinski; Alanna M Chamberlain; Ruoxiang Jiang; Yariv Gerber; Véronique L Roger
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 4.965

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.