Literature DB >> 33521483

Essential statistical principles of clinical trials of pain treatments.

Robert H Dworkin1, Scott R Evans2, Omar Mbowe3, Michael P McDermott4.   

Abstract

This article presents an overview of fundamental statistical principles of clinical trials of pain treatments. Statistical considerations relevant to phase 2 proof of concept and phase 3 confirmatory randomized trials investigating efficacy and safety are discussed, including (1) research design; (2) endpoints and analyses; (3) sample size determination and statistical power; (4) missing data and trial estimands; (5) data monitoring and interim analyses; and (6) interpretation of results. Although clinical trials of pharmacologic treatments are emphasized, the key issues raised by these trials are also directly applicable to clinical trials of other types of treatments, including biologics, devices, nonpharmacologic therapies (eg, physical therapy and cognitive-behavior therapy), and complementary and integrative health interventions.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The International Association for the Study of Pain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute pain; Chronic pain; Clinical trials; Endpoints; Missing data; Outcomes; Research design; Statistical analysis

Year:  2020        PMID: 33521483      PMCID: PMC7837867          DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Rep        ISSN: 2471-2531


  159 in total

1.  Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes.

Authors:  Isabelle Boutron; Susan Dutton; Philippe Ravaud; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Use of the cumulative proportion of responders analysis graph to present pain data over a range of cut-off points: making clinical trial data more understandable.

Authors:  John T Farrar; Robert H Dworkin; Mitchell B Max
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal trial designs of analgesics: focus on methodology.

Authors:  Nathaniel Katz
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.442

4.  Pain intensity rating training: results from an exploratory study of the ACTTION PROTECCT system.

Authors:  Shannon M Smith; Dagmar Amtmann; Robert L Askew; Jennifer S Gewandter; Matthew Hunsinger; Mark P Jensen; Michael P McDermott; Kushang V Patel; Mark Williams; Elizabeth D Bacci; Laurie B Burke; Christine T Chambers; Stephen A Cooper; Penney Cowan; Paul Desjardins; Mila Etropolski; John T Farrar; Ian Gilron; I-zu Huang; Mitchell Katz; Robert D Kerns; Ernest A Kopecky; Bob A Rappaport; Malca Resnick; Vibeke Strand; Geertrui F Vanhove; Christin Veasley; Mark Versavel; Ajay D Wasan; Dennis C Turk; Robert H Dworkin
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  The effect of oxcarbazepine in peripheral neuropathic pain depends on pain phenotype: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phenotype-stratified study.

Authors:  Dyveke T Demant; Karen Lund; Jan Vollert; Christoph Maier; Märtha Segerdahl; Nanna B Finnerup; Troels S Jensen; Søren H Sindrup
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy.

Authors:  Erick H Turner; Annette M Matthews; Eftihia Linardatos; Robert A Tell; Robert Rosenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Identifying important outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: an IMMPACT survey of people with pain.

Authors:  Dennis C Turk; Robert H Dworkin; Dennis Revicki; Gale Harding; Laurie B Burke; David Cella; Charles S Cleeland; Penney Cowan; John T Farrar; Sharon Hertz; Mitchell B Max; Bob A Rappaport
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Estimands and missing data in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments: advances in design and analysis.

Authors:  Xueya Cai; Jennifer S Gewandter; Hua He; Dennis C Turk; Robert H Dworkin; Michael P McDermott
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 7.926

Review 9.  Pain relief that matters to patients: systematic review of empirical studies assessing the minimum clinically important difference in acute pain.

Authors:  Mette Frahm Olsen; Eik Bjerre; Maria Damkjær Hansen; Jørgen Hilden; Nino Emanuel Landler; Britta Tendal; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Duloxetine use in chronic painful conditions--individual patient data responder analysis.

Authors:  R A Moore; N Cai; V Skljarevski; T R Tölle
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.931

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Benefit-risk assessment and reporting in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments: IMMPACT recommendations.

Authors:  Bethea A Kleykamp; Robert H Dworkin; Dennis C Turk; Zubin Bhagwagar; Penney Cowan; Christopher Eccleston; Susan S Ellenberg; Scott R Evans; John T Farrar; Roy L Freeman; Louis P Garrison; Jennifer S Gewandter; Veeraindar Goli; Smriti Iyengar; Alejandro R Jadad; Mark P Jensen; Roderick Junor; Nathaniel P Katz; J Patrick Kesslak; Ernest A Kopecky; Dmitri Lissin; John D Markman; Michael P McDermott; Philip J Mease; Alec B O'Connor; Kushang V Patel; Srinivasa N Raja; Michael C Rowbotham; Cristina Sampaio; Jasvinder A Singh; Ilona Steigerwald; Vibeke Strand; Leslie A Tive; Jeffrey Tobias; Ajay D Wasan; Hilary D Wilson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 7.926

2.  Designing prototype rapid test device at qualitative performance to detect residue of tetracycline in chicken carcass.

Authors:  Mochamad Lazuardi; Eka Pramyrtha Hestianah; Tjuk Imam Restiadi
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2022-04-25

Review 3.  The ACTTION Guide to Clinical Trials of Pain Treatments, part II: mitigating bias, maximizing value.

Authors:  Robert H Dworkin; Robert D Kerns; Michael P McDermott; Dennis C Turk; Christin Veasley
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2021-01-21

4.  Effectiveness of the eVISualisation of physical activity and pain intervention (eVIS) in Swedish Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Programmes: study protocol for a registry-based randomised controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Veronica Sjöberg; Elena Tseli; Andreas Monnier; Jens Westergren; Riccardo LoMartire; Björn O Äng; Maria Hagströmer; Mathilda Björk; Linda Vixner
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.006

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.