Literature DB >> 28491942

A dataset of multi-contrast population-averaged brain MRI atlases of a Parkinson׳s disease cohort.

Yiming Xiao1, Vladimir Fonov2, M Mallar Chakravarty3, Silvain Beriault2, Fahd Al Subaie4, Abbas Sadikot4, G Bruce Pike5, Gilles Bertrand4, D Louis Collins2.   

Abstract

Parkinson׳s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease that primarily affects the motor functions of the patients. Research and surgical treatment of PD (e.g., deep brain stimulation) often require human brain atlases for structural identification or as references for anatomical normalization. However, two pitfalls exist for many current atlases used for PD. First, most atlases do not represent the disease-specific anatomy as they are based on healthy young subjects. Second, subcortical structures, such as the subthalamic nucleus (STN) used in deep brain stimulation procedures, are often not well visualized. The dataset described in this Data in Brief is a population-averaged atlas that was made with 3 T MRI scans of 25 PD patients, and contains 5 image contrasts: T1w (FLASH & MPRAGE), T2*w, T1-T2* fusion, phase, and an R2* map. While the T1w, T2*w, and T1-T2* fusion templates provide excellent anatomical details for both cortical and sub-cortical structures, the phase and R2* map contain bio-chemical features. Probabilistic tissue maps of whiter matter, grey matter, and cerebrospinal fluid are provided for the atlas. We also manually segmented eight subcortical structures: caudate nucleus, putamen, globus pallidus internus and externus (GPi & GPe), thalamus, STN, substantia nigra (SN), and the red nucleus (RN). Lastly, a co-registered histology-derived digitized atlas containing 123 anatomical structures is included. The dataset is made freely available at the MNI data repository accessible through the link http://nist.mni.mcgill.ca/?p=1209.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atlas; Basal ganglia; Brain; Histology; MRI; Multi-contrast; Parkinson׳s disease; Registration; Segmentation; T2*

Year:  2017        PMID: 28491942      PMCID: PMC5413210          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications Table Value of the data Brain atlases of Parkinson׳s disease patients are currently rare. The publically available atlas represents the averaged anatomical and MRI intensity features of Parkinson׳s disease, with 5 different image contrasts. The T1–T2* fusion atlas conveniently visualizes cortical and subcortical structures in one image. Probabilistic brain tissue map, manual segmentation of eight subcortical nuclei, and a co-registered histology-based atlas are included.

Data

The dataset is a collection of six multi-contrast brain MRI atlases, accompanied by the associated probabilistic maps for three main brain tissue types, segmented labels for 8 subcortical nuclei, and a co-registered histology-based atlas. Derived from 3 T MRI scans of a cohort of 25 Parkinson׳s disease patients, the atlases were obtained by nonlinearly co-registering each patient׳s anatomy to a common space. The finished atlases are in MNI ICBM152 stereotactic space, with three image resolutions available: 1×1×1 mm3, 0.5×0.5×0.5 mm3, and 0.3×0.3×0.3 mm3.

Experimental design, materials and methods

Image acquisition

After informed consent, 25 Parkinson׳s disease patients (age=58±7 years, 13 male) were scanned with a T1w MPRAGE protocol and a multi-echo FLASH MRI protocol [1] on a Siemens 3 T Tim Trio MRI scanner. The whole-brain T1w MPRAGE had 176 sagittal slices (echo time (TE)=2.98 ms, repetition time (TR)=2300 ms, Inversion time (TI)=900 ms, flip angle (FA)=9°, BW=238 Hz/px, acquisition matrix=256×256, and resolution=1×1×1 mm3). The multi-contrast FLASH MRI contains 176 sagittal slices (TE={1.6, 4.1, 6.6, 9.1, 13.0, 16.0, 18.5, 21.0, 23.5, 26.0} ms, TR=30 ms, FA=23°, BW=±450 Hz/pix, acquisition matrix=256×256, resolution=0.95×0.95×0.95 mm3, 3/4 partial Fourier in the phase and slice encoding directions, and GRAPPA=2). From the multi-echo FLASH data acquired, four image contrasts were generated: T1w image, T2*w image, phase image, and R2* (i.e., 1/T2*) map. More specifically, the T1w and T2*w images are produced by averaging the magnitude images of the first four and last five echoes, respectively. The phase image is obtained via averaging the unwrapped phase images of the last five echoes using a homodyne filter, and the R2* map is computed by fitting all magnitude data to an exponential curve. As these contrasts are acquired simultaneously in one session, these processed images are inherently co-registered.

Image processing and atlasing

For each patient, the T1w MPRAGE MRI was rigidly registered to the multi-contrast FLASH dataset, and brain masks were generated using FSL brain extraction tool (BET) [2] based on the T1w MPRAGE MRIs. To facilitate inter-subject nonlinear registration, a T1–T2* fusion MRI was constructed for each individual using a spatially varying weighted combination of FLASH T1w and T2*w scans (full details in [3]). After non-local means denoising [4], non-uniformity correction [5], and intensity normalization, all T1–T2* fusion MRIs were first aligned to the MNI ICBM152 space [6] with full affine registration, and then all subject׳s data were co-registered together with an unbiased group-wise registration scheme [6]. Finally, the averaged result is the population-average T1–T2* fusion atlas, which combines cortical and subcortical details in one image, avoiding susceptibility artifacts in typical T2*w scans. Then, with the estimated deformation fields, atlases of other image contrasts (T1w (FLASH & MPRAGE), T2*w, phase, and R2* map) were created. For T1w (FLASH and MPRAGE) and T2*w contrasts, data were preprocessed in the same manner as the T1–T2* fusion images before atlas construction; for the phase image and R2* map, the data were used directly since their values do not require intensity standardization and should not be altered to truthfully reflect the biochemical properties of the tissue. As the appearances between the FLASH and MPRAGE T1w MRIs differ particularly for the cortex, due to different MRI acquisition methods, both contrasts were included in the dataset. Finally, three different image resolutions are provided for the atlases: 1×1×1 mm3, 0.5×0.5×0.5 mm3, and 0.3×0.3×0.3 mm3. While the first two resolutions cover the whole brain, the 0.3×0.3×0.3 mm3 resolution templates contain only the region for the subcortical nuclei. The atlases at 1×1×1 mm3 resolution are shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Multi-contrast population-averaged Parkinson׳s disease (1×1×1 mm3 resolution) atlases (columns from left to right: MPRAGE T1w, T1–T2* fusion, T2*w, FLASH T1w, R2* map, phase). The atlases are demonstrated with three slices: axial (Row 1), coronal (Row 2), and sagittal (Row 3). Note that these atlases include the population left-right asymmetry.

Probabilistic tissue maps and anatomical annotations

Three sets of tissue segmentations are provided: probabilistic tissue maps for white matter (WM), grey matter (GM) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), segmented labels for subcortical nuclei at 1×1×1 mm3 resolution, and segmented labels for midbrain nuclei at 0.3×0.3×0.3 mm3 resolution. First, fuzzy segmentations of WM, GM and CSF were obtained using a minimum distance classifier [7] for each patient, and the classification results are in the range of [0,1] roughly representing partial volume effects for each tissue class. The probabilistic tissue maps were generated by averaging the deformed individual fuzzy tissue segmentations in the population template space with the deformation fields previously generated. The results are shown in Fig. 2. Second, eight subcortical nuclei were manually segmented bilaterally in 3D at 1×1×1 mm3 resolution using ITK-SNAP (http://www.itksnap.org). More specifically, the caudate nucleus, the putamen, and the thalamus were segmented using T1w MPRAGE atlas. The globus pallidus internus and externus (GPi & GPe) were segmented based on the T1w MPRAGE and T2*w atlas, and the subthalamic nucleus (STN), the substantia nigra (SN), and the red nucleus (RN) were segmented with the T2*w atlas. The segmentation results are shown in Fig. 3. Lastly, to provide better delineation for nuclei with smaller volumes, the STN, SN and RN were manually re-segmented based on the T2*w atlas at 0.3×0.3×0.3 mm3 resolution (see Fig. 4). The label numbers and the associated structures for both sets of segmentations are detailed in Table 1. In addition, the Gilles-Mallar atlas [8] derived from histological data was nonlinearly registered to the population-averaged template (Please refer to [3] for more details). The atlas contains 123 structures, and the co-registered atlas at the resolution of 0.3×0.3×0.3 mm3 and 1×1×1 mm3 (see Fig. 5) are provided within the dataset. The label numbers with the corresponding anatomical structures defined in Schaltenbrand and Wahren [9], Gloor [10], and Hirai and Jones atlases [11] are listed in Table 2. Please note that we do not recommend using the basal ganglia-thalamic atlas, as is, as a clinical tool. Rather, we strongly recommend that each user undertake their own validation and diligence prior to use of the atlas for any research or clinical purpose in human.
Fig. 2

Probabilistic tissue maps for WM, GM and CSF with the corresponding view from the population-averaged MPRAGE T1w atlas. Note that due to partial volume effects, the boundary between CSF and WM appear bright in the GM map.

Fig. 3

Segmented labels for the subcortical nuclei at 1×1×1 mm3 resolution. The labels are shown on the axial and coronal views of the population-averaged MPRAGE T1w atlas. A 3D rendering of the labels is also shown with annotations for each structure. To provide better visualization, the thalamus is rendered as semi-transparent.

Fig. 4

Segmented labels for the midbrain nuclei (SN, STN, and RN) at 0.3×0.3×0.3 mm3 resolution overlaid on the T1–T2* fusion atlas. The left and right STNs are shown as magenta and cyan labels, the left and right RNs are shown as green and red labels, and the left and right SNs are shown as yellow and blue labels.

Table 1

Label numbers for the subcortical nuclei segmentations with the corresponding structures. Note that the label numbers are consistent between the segmentations at 1×1×1 mm3 and 0.3×0.3×0.3 mm3.

Label numberNucleiLabel numberNuclei
1Left red nucleus2Right red nucleus
3Left substantia nigra4Right Substantia nigra
5Left subthalamic nucleus6Right subthalamic nucleus
7Left caudate8Right caudate
9Left putamen10Right putamen
11Left globus pallidus externa12Right globus pallidus externa
13Left globus pallidus interna14Right globus pallidus interna
15Left thalamus16Right thalamus
Fig. 5

Co-registration of voxelized histological atlas [8] to the PD atlas at 0.3×0.3×0.3 mm3 resolution and 1×1×1 mm3 resolution.

Table 2

Label numbers and anatomical structures in the co-registered histological atlas.

LabelSchaltenbrand and WahrenGloorHirai and JonesNotesLabelSchaltenbrand and WahrenGloorHirai and JonesNotes
1Striatum2Cortex
3Claustrum4Internal capsule
5Globus Pallidus (Pm)6Nucleus amygdala profundus lateralis (A. p. l.)Lateral nucleus (L)Amygdala
7Optic Tract (II)8Nucleus amygdala profundus intermedius (A. p. l.)Basal nucleus (B)Amygdala
9Anterior commissure (Cm.a.)10Lateral medullary lamina (la.p.l)
11Globus Pallidus Internal (Pm.I)12Globus Pallidus external (Pm.e)
13Anterior Perforated substance (B)14Nucleus amygdalae profundus lateralis (A.p.m)Accessory Basal Nucleus (AB)Amygdala
15Ventro-oralis internus (V.o.i.)Thalamus16Stratum septi pellucidi (Str.sep)
17Pro-thalamicus principalis centralis (Pth. Pr. Ce.)Bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST)Hypothalamus19Nucleus facialis (VII)
20Nucleus amygdalae profundus ventralis (A.p.v)Para Laminar nucleus (PL)amygdala21Medial medullary lamina (la.p.m)
22Stria medullaris thalami (st. m)23Nucleus paraventricularis hypothalamic (Pv)
24Nucleus Reticulatus Polaris (Rt.po.)25Zona incerta (Z.i.)
26Nucleus lateropolaris thalami (Lpo)Ventral Anterior Nucleus(VA)Thalamus: see lables 36,89,9027Nucleus fasciculosus thalami (Fa)Medioventral Nucleus (MV)Thalamus
28Nucleus Anterior Principalis (Apr)Antero-ventral nucleusthalamus29Mamillary body (M.m)
35Fornix (Fx)36Dorso-oralis externus (D.o.e)Ventral Anterior Nucleus (VA)Thalamus: see labels 26,89,90 for HJ thalamus
37Nucleus Medialis (M)Mediodorsal Nucleus (MD)Thalamus39Subthalamic nucleus (Sth)
40Lamella medialis thalami (La. M.)Thalamus41Campus Forellii (pars H2)Thalamus
47Pars compacta (Ni.c)/pars reticula (Ni.r)Substantia nigra48Ruber (Ru)Red nucleus
49Nucleus Centralis (Ce.)Central Median Nucleus (CM)Thalamus51Nucleus Parafasiculairs (Pf.)Thalamus
52WM in red nucleus and travelling towards the thalamus53Nucleus Dorsalis superficialis (D.sf.)Lateral dorsal nucleus (LD)Thalamus
60Fasciculus gracillis Goll (G)61Paegeniculatum (prG)
63Penduncle64Nucleus peripendicularis (Ppd.)Thalamus
66Ganglion habenulae medialis (H.m)Forms Hb with 6767Ganglion habenulae internus (H.i)Forms Hb with66
68Corpus geniculatum mediale (G.m/G.Md)70Nucleus Limitans (Li)Nucleus Limitans (Li)Thalamus
71Ventro-caudalis parvocell (V.c.pc)Basal nucleus Medial nucleus/Ventral posterior inferior nucleus (VMb/VPI)Thalamus73Lemniscus medialis (L.m)
74Brachium colliculi inferioris (B.co.i)75Nucleus Vestibularis (VIII)
76Area trangularis Wernicke (A.tr.W)81Ventro-oralis medialis (V.o.m.)Ventral Medial Nucleus (VM)Thalamus
86Ventro-oralis internus (V.o.i.)Ventral lateral posterior nucleus (VLp)Thalamus: see labels 86,91,92,93,94,104,111,112,114,120 for HJ87Ventro-oralis anterior (V.o.a.)Ventral lateral anterior nucleus (VLa)Thalamus: see labels 87,88,91,123 for HJ
88Ventro-oralis posterior (V.o.p.)Ventral lateral anterior nucleus (VLa)Thalamus: see labels 87,88,91,123 for HJ89Dorso-oralis internus (D.o.i)Ventral anterior nucleus (VA)Thalamus: see labels 26,36,90 for HJ
90Zentro-lateralis oralis (Z.o.)Ventral lateral anterior nucleus (VLa)Thalamus: see labels 87,88,91,123 for HJ91Ventro-intermedius internus (V.im.i)Ventral lateral posterior nucleus (VLp)Thalamus: see labels 86,91,92,93,94,104,111,112,114,120 for HJ
92Zentro-lateralis externus (Z.im.e)Ventral lateral posterior nucleus (VLp)Thalamus: see labels 86,91,92,93,94,104,111,112,114,120 for HJ93Zentro-intermedius internus (Z.im.i)Ventral lateral posterior nucleus (VLp)Thalamus: see labels 86,91,92,93,94,104,111,112,114,120 for HJ
94Ventro-intermedius externus (V.im.e)Ventral lateral posterior nucleus (VLp)Thalamus: see labels 86,91,92,93,94,104,111,112,114,120 for HJ95Ventro-caudalis internus (V.c.i)Ventral posterior medial nucleus (VPM)Thalamus: see labels 95,113
96Ventro-caudalis anterior internus (V.c.a.e)Ventral posterior lateral nucleus (VPLa)Thalamus: see labels 96,97,98 for HJ97Zentro caudalis externis (Z.c.e)Ventral posterior lateral nucleus (VPLa)Thalamus: see labels 96,97,98 for HJ
98Zentro caudalis internis (Z.c.i)Ventral posterior lateral nucleus (VPLa)Thalamus: see labels 96,97,98 for HJ99Dorso-caudalis (D.c.)Lateral posterior nucleus (LP)Thalamus: see labels 99,100,101
100Nucleus pulvinaris orolateralis (Pu.o.l)Lateral posterior nucleus (LP)Thalamus: see labels 99,100,101101Nucleus pulvinaris oromedialis (Pu.o.m.)Lateral posterior nucleus (LP)Thalamus: see labels 99,100,101
102Ventro-caualis portae (V.c.por)Anterior pulvinal nucleus (Pla)Thalamus: see labels 102,103103Nucleus pulvinaris oroventralis (Pu.o.v)Anterior pulvinal nucleus (Pla)Thalamus: see labels 102,103
104Nucleus ventroimtermedius internus (V.im.i)Posterior Nucleus (VLp)Thalamus: see labels 86,91,92,93,94,104,111,112,114,120 for HJ105Nucleus pulvinaris intereniculatus (Pu.ig)Inferior pulvinar nucleus (Pli)Thalamus
106Nucleus pulvinaris (Pu.m)Medial pulvinar nucleus (Plm)Thalamus107Pulvinar laterale (Pu.l)Lateral pulvinar nucleus (Pll)Thalamus
108Corpus collsum109Cerebro-spinal fluid
110General white matter111Dorso-intermedius internus (D.im.i)Ventral lateral posterior nucleus (VLp)Thalamus: see labels 86,91,92,93,94,104,111,112,114,120 for HJ
112Dorso-intermedius externus (D.im.e)Ventral lateral posterior nucleus (VLp)Thalamus: see labels 86,91,92,93,94,104,111,112,114,120 for HJ113Ventro-caudalis anterior internus (V.c.a.i)Ventral posterior medial nucleus (VPM)Thalamus: see label 95,113
114Zentro-lateralis intermedius (Z.im)Ventral lateral posterior nucleus (VLp)Thalamus115Ventro-caudalis externus (v.c.e)Ventral posterior lateral nucleus (VPLa)Thalamus: see labels 115,118
116Nucleus pulvinaris superficialis (Pu.sf)Thalamus117Ventro-caudalis parvocell externus (V.c.pc.e)Ventral posterior inferior nucleus (VPI)Thalamus
118Ventro-caudalis posterior externus (V.c.p.e)Ventral posterior lateral nucleus (VPLa)Thalamus119Pulvinar mediale (Pu.m)Medial pulvinar nucleus (Plm)Thalamus
120Ventro-oralis posterior (V.o.p)Ventral lateral posterior nucleus (VLp)Thalamus: see labels 86,104,120 for HJ121Zentro-intermedius externus (Z.im.e)Ventral lateral anterior nucleus (VLa)Thalamus
122Ventro-intermedius externus (V.im.e)Ventral lateral anterior nucleus (VLa)Thalamus123Dorso-oralis internus (D.o.i)Ventral lateral anterior nucleus (VLa)Thalamus: see labels 87,88,91,123 for HJ
Subject areaNeuroanatomy
More specific subject areaBrain MRI atlas
Type of dataPopulation-averaged brain MRI atlas & brain tissue segmentation
How data was acquired3 T Magnetic resonance imaging
Data formatMINC1, MINC2 & NIFTI
Experimental factors25 Parkinson׳s disease patients were scanned with a 10-echo multi-contrast FLASH and a T1w MPRAGE MRI sequence.
Experimental featuresT1–T2* fusion MRI was created for each patient, and used to drive group-wise registration to create a population-averaged multi-contrast atlas in the MNI ICBM152 space. Probabilistic tissue maps, manual segmentations of 8 subcortical nuclei, and a histology-derived digitized atlas of 123 anatomical structures are provided for the atlas.
Data source locationMontreal, Canada
Data accessibilityThe dataset is made available in public repository:http://nist.mni.mcgill.ca/?p=1209
  9 in total

1.  The creation of a brain atlas for image guided neurosurgery using serial histological data.

Authors:  M Mallar Chakravarty; Gilles Bertrand; Charles P Hodge; Abbas F Sadikot; D Louis Collins
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-01-09       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  A new improved version of the realistic digital brain phantom.

Authors:  Berengere Aubert-Broche; Alan C Evans; Louis Collins
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  An optimized blockwise nonlocal means denoising filter for 3-D magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  P Coupe; P Yger; S Prima; P Hellier; C Kervrann; C Barillot
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data.

Authors:  J G Sled; A P Zijdenbos; A C Evans
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Multi-contrast unbiased MRI atlas of a Parkinson's disease population.

Authors:  Yiming Xiao; Vladimir Fonov; Silvain Bériault; Fahd Al Subaie; M Mallar Chakravarty; Abbas F Sadikot; G Bruce Pike; D Louis Collins
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Multicontrast multiecho FLASH MRI for targeting the subthalamic nucleus.

Authors:  Yiming Xiao; Silvain Beriault; G Bruce Pike; D Louis Collins
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Unbiased average age-appropriate atlases for pediatric studies.

Authors:  Vladimir Fonov; Alan C Evans; Kelly Botteron; C Robert Almli; Robert C McKinstry; D Louis Collins
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  A new parcellation of the human thalamus on the basis of histochemical staining.

Authors:  T Hirai; E G Jones
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  1989 Jan-Mar

Review 9.  Fast robust automated brain extraction.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.038

  9 in total
  31 in total

1.  A framework for evaluating correspondence between brain images using anatomical fiducials.

Authors:  Jonathan C Lau; Andrew G Parrent; John Demarco; Geetika Gupta; Jason Kai; Olivia W Stanley; Tristan Kuehn; Patrick J Park; Kayla Ferko; Ali R Khan; Terry M Peters
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Akinetic rigid symptoms are associated with decline in a cortical motor network in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Sarah J Kann; Chiapei Chang; Peter Manza; Hoi-Chung Leung
Journal:  NPJ Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2020-08-24

3.  Is impaired dopaminergic function associated with mobility capacity in older adults?

Authors:  Simon Moskowitz; David W Russ; Leatha A Clark; Nathan P Wages; Dustin R Grooms; Adam J Woods; Julie Suhr; Janet E Simon; Andrew O'Shea; Cody R Criss; Paolo Fadda; Brian C Clark
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 7.713

4.  Lead-DBS v2: Towards a comprehensive pipeline for deep brain stimulation imaging.

Authors:  Andreas Horn; Ningfei Li; Till A Dembek; Ari Kappel; Chadwick Boulay; Siobhan Ewert; Anna Tietze; Andreas Husch; Thushara Perera; Wolf-Julian Neumann; Marco Reisert; Hang Si; Robert Oostenveld; Christopher Rorden; Fang-Cheng Yeh; Qianqian Fang; Todd M Herrington; Johannes Vorwerk; Andrea A Kühn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Subthalamic-Cortical Network Reorganization during Parkinson's Tremor.

Authors:  Peter M Lauro; Shane Lee; Umer Akbar; Wael F Asaad
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 6.709

6.  Automatic localization of the subthalamic nucleus on patient-specific clinical MRI by incorporating 7 T MRI and machine learning: Application in deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Jinyoung Kim; Yuval Duchin; Reuben R Shamir; Remi Patriat; Jerrold Vitek; Noam Harel; Guillermo Sapiro
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Edge-enhancing gradient echo with multi-image co-registration and averaging (EDGE-MICRA) for targeting thalamic centromedian and parafascicular nuclei.

Authors:  Erik H Middlebrooks; Lela Okromelidze; Chen Lin; Ayushi Jain; Erin Westerhold; Anthony Ritaccio; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa; Vivek Gupta; Sanjeet S Grewal
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2021-06-13

8.  Deep-learning based fully automatic segmentation of the globus pallidus interna and externa using ultra-high 7 Tesla MRI.

Authors:  Oren Solomon; Tara Palnitkar; Re'mi Patriat; Henry Braun; Joshua Aman; Michael C Park; Jerrold Vitek; Guillermo Sapiro; Noam Harel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Rapid motor fluctuations reveal short-timescale neurophysiological biomarkers of Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Minkyu Ahn; Shane Lee; Peter M Lauro; Erin L Schaeffer; Umer Akbar; Wael F Asaad
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Value encoding in the globus pallidus: fMRI reveals an interaction effect between reward and dopamine drive.

Authors:  Vincenzo G Fiore; Tobias Nolte; Francesco Rigoli; Peter Smittenaar; Xiaosi Gu; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.