Literature DB >> 28471215

Cognitive aging and the distinction between intentional and unintentional mind wandering.

Paul Seli1, David Maillet1, Daniel Smilek2, Jonathan M Oakman2, Daniel L Schacter1.   

Abstract

A growing number of studies have reported age-related reductions in the frequency of mind wandering. Here, at both the trait (Study 1) and state (Study 2) levels, we reexamined this association while distinguishing between intentional (deliberate) and unintentional (spontaneous) mind wandering. Based on research demonstrating age-accompanied deficits in executive functioning, we expected to observe increases in unintentional mind wandering with increasing age. Moreover, because aging is associated with increased task motivation, we reasoned that older adults might be more engaged in their tasks, and hence, show a more pronounced decline in intentional mind wandering relative to young adults. In both studies, we found that older adults did indeed report lower rates of intentional mind wandering compared with young adults. However, contrary to our expectations, we also found that older adults reported lower rates of unintentional mind wandering (Studies 1 and 2). We discuss the implications of these findings for theories of age-related declines in mind wandering. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28471215      PMCID: PMC5459659          DOI: 10.1037/pag0000172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  36 in total

1.  Assessing the associations among trait and state levels of deliberate and spontaneous mind wandering.

Authors:  Paul Seli; Evan F Risko; Daniel Smilek
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2016-02-11

2.  A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card-sorting problem.

Authors:  D A GRANT; E A BERG
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1948-08

3.  Does mind wandering reflect executive function or executive failure? Comment on Smallwood and Schooler (2006) and Watkins (2008).

Authors:  Jennifer C McVay; Michael J Kane
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Task-unrelated-thought frequency as a function of age: a laboratory study.

Authors:  Leonard M Giambra
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1989-06

5.  On the relation of mind wandering and ADHD symptomatology.

Authors:  Paul Seli; Jonathan Smallwood; James Allan Cheyne; Daniel Smilek
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

6.  Intentionality and meta-awareness of mind wandering: Are they one and the same, or distinct dimensions?

Authors:  Paul Seli; Brandon C W Ralph; Evan F Risko; Jonathan W Schooler; Daniel L Schacter; Daniel Smilek
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

7.  Motivation, intentionality, and mind wandering: Implications for assessments of task-unrelated thought.

Authors:  Paul Seli; James Allan Cheyne; Mengran Xu; Christine Purdon; Daniel Smilek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  The influence of aging on spontaneous shifts of attention from external stimuli to the contents of consciousness.

Authors:  L M Giambra
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  1993 Jul-Oct       Impact factor: 4.032

9.  Aging ebbs the flow of thought: adult age differences in mind wandering, executive control, and self-evaluation.

Authors:  Jennifer C McVay; Matthew E Meier; Dayna R Touron; Michael J Kane
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2012-12-20

10.  Enhancing SART Validity by Statistically Controlling Speed-Accuracy Trade-Offs.

Authors:  Paul Seli; Tanya R Jonker; James Allan Cheyne; Daniel Smilek
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-13
View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Reconceptualizing mind wandering from a switching perspective.

Authors:  Yi-Sheng Wong; Adrian R Willoughby; Liana Machado
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-03-29

2.  Individual differences in dimensions of mind wandering: the mediating role of emotional valence and intentionality.

Authors:  Jonathan B Banks; Matthew S Welhaf
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-08-31

Review 3.  Mind-Wandering as a Natural Kind: A Family-Resemblances View.

Authors:  Paul Seli; Michael J Kane; Jonathan Smallwood; Daniel L Schacter; David Maillet; Jonathan W Schooler; Daniel Smilek
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Mind-Wandering Across the Age Gap: Age-Related Differences in Mind-Wandering Are Partially Attributable to Age-Related Differences in Motivation.

Authors:  Paul Seli; Kevin O'Neill; Jonathan S A Carriere; Daniel Smilek; Roger E Beaty; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Dispositional factors account for age differences in self-reported mind-wandering.

Authors:  Jessica Nicosia; David Balota
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2021-06

6.  Testing the construct validity of competing measurement approaches to probed mind-wandering reports.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Bridget A Smeekens; Matt E Meier; Matthew S Welhaf; Natalie E Phillips
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-04-09

7.  Alterations in resting-state network dynamics along the Alzheimer's disease continuum.

Authors:  D Puttaert; N Coquelet; V Wens; P Peigneux; P Fery; A Rovai; N Trotta; N Sadeghi; T Coolen; J-C Bier; S Goldman; X De Tiège
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Spontaneous and deliberate future thinking: a dual process account.

Authors:  Scott Cole; Lia Kvavilashvili
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-12-05

Review 9.  The ironic effect of older adults' increased task motivation: Implications for neurocognitive aging.

Authors:  A Dawn Ryan; Karen L Campbell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-06-25

10.  Changes in electrophysiological static and dynamic human brain functional architecture from childhood to late adulthood.

Authors:  N Coquelet; V Wens; A Mary; M Niesen; D Puttaert; M Ranzini; M Vander Ghinst; M Bourguignon; P Peigneux; S Goldman; M Woolrich; X De Tiège
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.