Literature DB >> 26874591

Assessing the associations among trait and state levels of deliberate and spontaneous mind wandering.

Paul Seli1, Evan F Risko2, Daniel Smilek2.   

Abstract

Recent research has demonstrated that mind wandering can be subdivided into spontaneous and deliberate types, and this distinction has been found to hold at both the trait and state levels. However, to date, no attempts have been made to link trait-level spontaneous and deliberate mind wandering with state-level assessments of these two subtypes of mind wandering. Here we evaluated whether trait-level deliberate and spontaneous mind wandering map onto state levels of these subtypes of mind wandering. Results showed correspondence between trait-level reports of spontaneous and deliberate mind wandering and their state-level counterparts, indicating that people's reports on the intentionality of their mind wandering in the laboratory correspond to their reports of the intentionality of mind wandering in everyday life. Thus, the trait- and state-level scales of mind wandering were found to validate each other: Whereas the state-level measures provided some construct validity for the trait-level measures, the trait-level measures indicated that the state-level measures may be generalizable to everyday situations.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deliberate; Mind wandering; Spontaneous; State level; Trait level

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26874591     DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  8 in total

1.  Deep, effortless concentration: re-examining the flow concept and exploring relations with inattention, absorption, and personality.

Authors:  Jeremy Marty-Dugas; Daniel Smilek
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-06-14

2.  Intentionality and meta-awareness of mind wandering: Are they one and the same, or distinct dimensions?

Authors:  Paul Seli; Brandon C W Ralph; Evan F Risko; Jonathan W Schooler; Daniel L Schacter; Daniel Smilek
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

3.  Cognitive aging and the distinction between intentional and unintentional mind wandering.

Authors:  Paul Seli; David Maillet; Daniel Smilek; Jonathan M Oakman; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2017-05-04

Review 4.  The relationship between mind wandering and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Paola Bonifacci; Cinzia Viroli; Chiara Vassura; Elisa Colombini; Lorenzo Desideri
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-07-15

Review 5.  Mind-Wandering as a Natural Kind: A Family-Resemblances View.

Authors:  Paul Seli; Michael J Kane; Jonathan Smallwood; Daniel L Schacter; David Maillet; Jonathan W Schooler; Daniel Smilek
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 6.  Mind-Wandering With and Without Intention.

Authors:  Paul Seli; Evan F Risko; Daniel Smilek; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Testing the construct validity of competing measurement approaches to probed mind-wandering reports.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Bridget A Smeekens; Matt E Meier; Matthew S Welhaf; Natalie E Phillips
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-04-09

8.  Executive failure hypothesis explains the trait-level association between motivation and mind wandering.

Authors:  Toshikazu Kawagoe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 4.996

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.