Literature DB >> 8224044

The influence of aging on spontaneous shifts of attention from external stimuli to the contents of consciousness.

L M Giambra1.   

Abstract

In a series of studies using laboratory procedures and retrospective reports it has been established that with increasing age adults less frequently have unbidden task-unrelated image and thought intrusions (TUITs). TUITs--also referred to as daydreams--have been linked to the "current concerns" and "unfinished business" of the individual, and old adults have been shown to express fewer current concerns than young adults. It has also been hypothesized that selective loss of neurons in old age might interfere with thought production, resulting in fewer unbidden thoughts and spontaneous shifts of attention to them. In this article we examine the extent to which intraindividual change in the frequency of TUITs over 6 to 8 years is consistent with the decrease expected from the prior cross-sectional studies. In particular, we examine the frequency of daydreams based upon retrospective self-reports using the Daydreaming Frequency scale of the Imaginal Processes Inventory. The longitudinal sample consisted of 93 women and 169 men. Significant and equivalent decreases in Daydreaming Frequency scale values occurred at all ages. Longitudinal decreases were consistent with cross-sectional age differences. Thus, spontaneous shifts of attention to the contents of consciousness were seen to decrease over a 6 to 8 year interval within individuals--a result consistent with a within-individual change in conditions leading to spontaneous shifts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8224044     DOI: 10.1016/0531-5565(93)90073-m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Gerontol        ISSN: 0531-5565            Impact factor:   4.032


  25 in total

1.  Drifting from slow to "D'oh!": working memory capacity and mind wandering predict extreme reaction times and executive control errors.

Authors:  Jennifer C McVay; Michael J Kane
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Counting the cost of an absent mind: mind wandering as an underrecognized influence on educational performance.

Authors:  Jonathan Smallwood; Daniel J Fishman; Jonathan W Schooler
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04

3.  Mind-wandering and falls risk in older adults.

Authors:  Lindsay S Nagamatsu; Julia W Y Kam; Teresa Liu-Ambrose; Alison Chan; Todd C Handy
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2013-09

4.  Does mind wandering reflect executive function or executive failure? Comment on Smallwood and Schooler (2006) and Watkins (2008).

Authors:  Jennifer C McVay; Michael J Kane
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Mind-wandering in healthy aging and early stage Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Mate Gyurkovics; David A Balota; Jonathan D Jackson
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Mind-wandering in younger and older adults: converging evidence from the Sustained Attention to Response Task and reading for comprehension.

Authors:  Jonathan D Jackson; David A Balota
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-06-27

7.  Cognitive aging and the distinction between intentional and unintentional mind wandering.

Authors:  Paul Seli; David Maillet; Daniel Smilek; Jonathan M Oakman; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2017-05-04

8.  Mind-wandering and task stimuli: Stimulus-dependent thoughts influence performance on memory tasks and are more often past- versus future-oriented.

Authors:  David Maillet; Paul Seli; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2017-05-02

Review 9.  From mind wandering to involuntary retrieval: Age-related differences in spontaneous cognitive processes.

Authors:  David Maillet; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Neural Responses to Heartbeats in the Default Network Encode the Self in Spontaneous Thoughts.

Authors:  Mariana Babo-Rebelo; Craig G Richter; Catherine Tallon-Baudry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.