Literature DB >> 23261422

Aging ebbs the flow of thought: adult age differences in mind wandering, executive control, and self-evaluation.

Jennifer C McVay1, Matthew E Meier, Dayna R Touron, Michael J Kane.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined the relations among adult aging, mind wandering, and executive-task performance, following from surprising laboratory findings that older adults report fewer task-unrelated thoughts (TUTs) than do younger adults (e.g., Giambra, 1989; Jackson & Balota, 2012). Because older adults may experience more ability- and performance-related worry during cognitive tasks in the laboratory, and because these evaluative thoughts (known as task-related interference, "TRI") might be sometimes misclassified by subjects as task-related, we asked subjects to distinguish task-related thoughts from TRI and TUTs when probed during ongoing tasks. In Experiment 1, younger and older adults completed either a go/no-go or a vigilance version of a sustained attention to response task (SART). Older adults reported more TRI and fewer TUTs than did younger adults while also performing more accurately. In Experiment 2, subjects completed either a 1- or a 2-back version of the n-back task. Older adults again reported more TRI and fewer TUTs than younger adults in both versions, while performing better than younger adults in the 1-back and worse in the 2-back. Across experiments, older adults' reduced TUT rates were independent of performance relative to younger adults. And, although older adults consistently reported more TRI and less mind wandering than did younger adults, overall they reported more on-task thoughts. TRI cannot, therefore, account completely for prior reports of decreasing TUTs with aging. We discuss the implications of these results for various theoretical approaches to mind-wandering.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23261422      PMCID: PMC3545047          DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  54 in total

1.  Characteristics of self-reported memory compensation in older adults.

Authors:  R A Dixon; C M de Frias; L Bäckman
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.475

2.  Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information.

Authors:  W K KIRCHNER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1958-04

3.  Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer's type.

Authors:  D H Spieler; D A Balota; M E Faust
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Age and the availability of inferences.

Authors:  V P Hamm; L Hasher
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1992-03

5.  For whom the mind wanders, and when: an experience-sampling study of working memory and executive control in daily life.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Leslie H Brown; Jennifer C McVay; Paul J Silvia; Inez Myin-Germeys; Thomas R Kwapil
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-07

6.  Aging and working memory inside and outside the focus of attention: dissociations of availability and accessibility.

Authors:  Leslie Vaughan; Chandramallika Basak; Marilyn Hartman; Paul Verhaeghen
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2008-05-16

7.  Aging and suppression: memory for previously relevant information.

Authors:  M Hartman; L Hasher
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1991-12

8.  Task-unrelated-thought frequency as a function of age: a laboratory study.

Authors:  Leonard M Giambra
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1989-06

9.  Stimulus-independent thought depends on central executive resources.

Authors:  J D Teasdale; B H Dritschel; M J Taylor; L Proctor; C A Lloyd; I Nimmo-Smith; A D Baddeley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-09
View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  How often are thoughts metacognitive? Findings from research on self-regulated learning, think-aloud protocols, and mind-wandering.

Authors:  Megan L Jordano; Dayna R Touron
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

2.  Mind-wandering in healthy aging and early stage Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Mate Gyurkovics; David A Balota; Jonathan D Jackson
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Inhibition in aging: What is preserved? What declines? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alodie Rey-Mermet; Miriam Gade
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

4.  Task-related thought and metacognitive ability in mind wandering reports: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Toshikazu Kawagoe; Takayoshi Kase
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-04-22

5.  Cognitive aging and the distinction between intentional and unintentional mind wandering.

Authors:  Paul Seli; David Maillet; Daniel Smilek; Jonathan M Oakman; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2017-05-04

Review 6.  From mind wandering to involuntary retrieval: Age-related differences in spontaneous cognitive processes.

Authors:  David Maillet; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Individual differences in the executive control of attention, memory, and thought, and their associations with schizotypy.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Matt E Meier; Bridget A Smeekens; Georgina M Gross; Charlotte A Chun; Paul J Silvia; Thomas R Kwapil
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-06-16

8.  When the mind wanders: Distinguishing stimulus-dependent from stimulus-independent thoughts during incidental encoding in young and older adults.

Authors:  David Maillet; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2016-06

9.  Testing the differential effects of symptom management interventions in cancer.

Authors:  Alla Sikorskii; Charles W Given; Azfar-E-Alam Siddiqi; Victoria Champion; Ruth McCorkle; Sandra L Spoelstra; Barbara A Given
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 10.  A cognitive framework for understanding and improving interference resolution in the brain.

Authors:  Jyoti Mishra; Joaquin A Anguera; David A Ziegler; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.453

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.