Literature DB >> 28469043

Prospective Evaluation of the Relationship Between Mechanical Stability and Response to Palliative Radiotherapy for Symptomatic Spinal Metastases.

Joanne M van der Velden1, Anne L Versteeg2, Helena M Verkooijen1,3, Charles G Fisher4,5, Edward Chow6, F Cumhur Oner7, Marco van Vulpen1, Lorna Weir8,9, Jorrit-Jan Verlaan7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A substantial number of patients with spinal metastases experience no treatment effect from palliative radiotherapy. Mechanical spinal instability, due to metastatic disease, could be associated with failed pain control following radiotherapy. This study investigates the relationship between the degree of spinal instability, as defined by the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS), and response to radiotherapy in patients with symptomatic spinal metastases in a multi-institutional cohort. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The SINS of 155 patients with painful thoracic, lumbar, or lumbosacral metastases from two tertiary hospitals was calculated using images from radiotherapy planning CT scans. Patient-reported pain response, available for 124 patients, was prospectively assessed. Pain response was categorized, according to international guidelines, as complete, partial, indeterminate, or progression of pain. The association between SINS and pain response was estimated by multivariable logistic regression analysis, correcting for predetermined clinical variables.
RESULTS: Of the 124 patients, 16 patients experienced a complete response and 65 patients experienced a partial response. Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score was associated with a complete pain response (adjusted odds-radio [ORadj] 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-0.98), but not with an overall pain response (ORadj 0.94; 95% CI 0.81-1.10).
CONCLUSIONS: A lower SINS, indicating spinal stability, is associated with a complete pain response to radiotherapy. This supports the hypothesis that pain resulting from mechanical spinal instability responds less well to radiotherapy compared with pain from local tumor activity. No association could be determined between SINS and an overall pain response, which might indicate that this referral tool is not yet optimal for prediction of treatment outcome. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Patients with stable painful spinal metastases, as indicated by a Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) of 6 or lower, can effectively be treated with palliative external beam radiotherapy. The majority of patients with (impending) spinal instability, as indicated by a SINS score of 7 or higher, will achieve a (partial) response after palliative radiotherapy; however, some patients might require surgical intervention. Therefore, it is recommended to refer patients with a SINS score of 7 or higher to a spine surgeon to evaluate the need for surgical intervention. © AlphaMed Press 2017.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pain response; Palliative radiotherapy; Spinal instability; Spinal metastases; Spinal neoplastic instability score

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28469043      PMCID: PMC5553957          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  24 in total

1.  International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011).

Authors:  Steven C Kirshblum; Stephen P Burns; Fin Biering-Sorensen; William Donovan; Daniel E Graves; Amitabh Jha; Mark Johansen; Linda Jones; Andrei Krassioukov; M J Mulcahey; Mary Schmidt-Read; William Waring
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Update of the international consensus on palliative radiotherapy endpoints for future clinical trials in bone metastases.

Authors:  Edward Chow; Peter Hoskin; Gunita Mitera; Liang Zeng; Stephen Lutz; Daniel Roos; Carol Hahn; Yvette van der Linden; William Hartsell; Eshwar Kumar
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Randomized, double-blind study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced cancer (excluding breast and prostate cancer) or multiple myeloma.

Authors:  David H Henry; Luis Costa; Francois Goldwasser; Vera Hirsh; Vania Hungria; Jana Prausova; Giorgio Vittorio Scagliotti; Harm Sleeboom; Andrew Spencer; Saroj Vadhan-Raj; Roger von Moos; Wolfgang Willenbacher; Penella J Woll; Jianming Wang; Qi Jiang; Susie Jun; Roger Dansey; Howard Yeh
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  A novel classification system for spinal instability in neoplastic disease: an evidence-based approach and expert consensus from the Spine Oncology Study Group.

Authors:  Charles G Fisher; Christian P DiPaola; Timothy C Ryken; Mark H Bilsky; Christopher I Shaffrey; Sigurd H Berven; James S Harrop; Michael G Fehlings; Stefano Boriani; Dean Chou; Meic H Schmidt; David W Polly; Roberto Biagini; Shane Burch; Mark B Dekutoski; Aruna Ganju; Peter C Gerszten; Ziya L Gokaslan; Michael W Groff; Norbert J Liebsch; Ehud Mendel; Scott H Okuno; Shreyaskumar Patel; Laurence D Rhines; Peter S Rose; Daniel M Sciubba; Narayan Sundaresan; Katsuro Tomita; Peter P Varga; Luiz R Vialle; Frank D Vrionis; Yoshiya Yamada; Daryl R Fourney
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Surgical management of metastatic spinal tumors.

Authors:  I Laufer; D M Sciubba; M Madera; A Bydon; T J Witham; Z L Gokaslan; J-P Wolinsky
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.302

7.  Comparison of pain response and functional interference outcomes between spinal and non-spinal bone metastases treated with palliative radiotherapy.

Authors:  Liang Zeng; Edward Chow; Liying Zhang; Shaelyn Culleton; Lori Holden; Florencia Jon; Luluel Khan; May Tsao; Elizabeth Barnes; Cyril Danjoux; Arjun Sahgal
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Evaluation of patients with advanced cancer using the Karnofsky performance status.

Authors:  J W Yates; B Chalmer; F P McKegney
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1980-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Is response to radiotherapy in patients related to the severity of pretreatment pain?

Authors:  Andrea Kirou-Mauro; Amanda Hird; Jennifer Wong; Emily Sinclair; Elizabeth A Barnes; May Tsao; Cyril Danjoux; Edward Chow
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  The Effect of Introducing the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score in Routine Clinical Practice for Patients With Spinal Metastases.

Authors:  Anne L Versteeg; Joanne M van der Velden; Helena M Verkooijen; Marco van Vulpen; F Cumhur Oner; Charles G Fisher; Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-12-14
View more
  8 in total

1.  Population description and clinical response assessment for spinal metastases: part 2 of the SPIne response assessment in Neuro-Oncology (SPINO) group report.

Authors:  Ilya Laufer; Simon S Lo; Eric L Chang; Jason Sheehan; Matthias Guckenberger; Moon-Jun Sohn; Samuel Ryu; Matthew Foote; Alexander Muacevic; Scott G Soltys; Samuel Chao; Sten Myrehaug; Peter C Gerszten; Eric Lis; Pejman Maralani; Mark Bilsky; Charles Fisher; Laurence Rhines; Jorrit-Jan Verlaan; David Schiff; Michael G Fehlings; Lijun Ma; Susan Chang; Wendy R Parulekar; Michael A Vogelbaum; Arjun Sahgal
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 2.  Classifications in Brief: The Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score.

Authors:  Hamza Murtaza; Connor W Sullivan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Impact of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score on Surgical Referral Patterns and Outcomes.

Authors:  M Dosani; S Lucas; J Wong; L Weir; S Lomas; C Cumayas; C Fisher; S Tyldesley
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Essential Concepts for the Management of Metastatic Spine Disease: What the Surgeon Should Know and Practice.

Authors:  Ori Barzilai; Stefano Boriani; Charles G Fisher; Arjun Sahgal; Jorrit Jan Verlaan; Ziya L Gokaslan; Aron Lazary; Chetan Bettegowda; Laurence D Rhines; Ilya Laufer
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-05-08

Review 5.  Ten Years After SINS: Role of Surgery and Radiotherapy in the Management of Patients With Vertebral Metastases.

Authors:  Nicolas Serratrice; Joe Faddoul; Bilal Tarabay; Christian Attieh; Moussa A Chalah; Samar S Ayache; Georges N Abi Lahoud
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 6.  The Palliative Care in the Metastatic Spinal Tumors. A Systematic Review on the Radiotherapy and Surgical Perspective.

Authors:  Giuseppe Roberto Giammalva; Gianluca Ferini; Fabio Torregrossa; Lara Brunasso; Sofia Musso; Umberto Emanuele Benigno; Rosa Maria Gerardi; Lapo Bonosi; Roberta Costanzo; Federica Paolini; Paolo Palmisciano; Giuseppe Emmanuele Umana; Rina Di Bonaventura; Carmelo Lucio Sturiale; Domenico Gerardo Iacopino; Rosario Maugeri
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-12

7.  Treatment Outcomes in Spinal Metastatic Disease With Indeterminate Stability.

Authors:  Brian L Dial; Anthony A Catanzano; Valentine Esposito; John Steele; Amanda Fletcher; Sean P Ryan; John P Kirkpatrick; C Rory Goodwin; Jordon Torok; Thomas Hopkins; Sergio Mendoza-Lattes
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-09-25

Review 8.  Single- Versus Multiple-Fraction Radiation Therapy for Painful Bone Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Nonrandomized Studies.

Authors:  Tetsuo Saito; Kohsei Yamaguchi; Ryo Toya; Natsuo Oya
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-06-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.