Literature DB >> 21343556

Randomized, double-blind study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced cancer (excluding breast and prostate cancer) or multiple myeloma.

David H Henry1, Luis Costa, Francois Goldwasser, Vera Hirsh, Vania Hungria, Jana Prausova, Giorgio Vittorio Scagliotti, Harm Sleeboom, Andrew Spencer, Saroj Vadhan-Raj, Roger von Moos, Wolfgang Willenbacher, Penella J Woll, Jianming Wang, Qi Jiang, Susie Jun, Roger Dansey, Howard Yeh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study compared denosumab, a fully human monoclonal anti-receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand antibody, with zoledronic acid (ZA) for delaying or preventing skeletal-related events (SRE) in patients with advanced cancer and bone metastases (excluding breast and prostate) or myeloma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind, double-dummy design to receive monthly subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg (n = 886) or intravenous ZA 4 mg (dose adjusted for renal impairment; n = 890). Daily supplemental calcium and vitamin D were strongly recommended. The primary end point was time to first on-study SRE (pathologic fracture, radiation or surgery to bone, or spinal cord compression).
RESULTS: Denosumab was noninferior to ZA in delaying time to first on-study SRE (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.98; P = .0007). Although directionally favorable, denosumab was not statistically superior to ZA in delaying time to first on-study SRE (P = .03 unadjusted; P = .06 adjusted for multiplicity) or time to first-and-subsequent (multiple) SRE (rate ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.04; P = .14). Overall survival and disease progression were similar between groups. Hypocalcemia occurred more frequently with denosumab. Osteonecrosis of the jaw occurred at similarly low rates in both groups. Acute-phase reactions after the first dose occurred more frequently with ZA, as did renal adverse events and elevations in serum creatinine based on National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events grading.
CONCLUSION: Denosumab was noninferior (trending to superiority) to ZA in preventing or delaying first on-study SRE in patients with advanced cancer metastatic to bone or myeloma. Denosumab represents a potential novel treatment option with the convenience of subcutaneous administration and no requirement for renal monitoring or dose adjustment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21343556     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.3304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  335 in total

Review 1.  Bone cancer in 2011: Prevention and treatment of bone metastases.

Authors:  Robert E Coleman
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Significant addition to treatment options for bone metastasis in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Emily D Richardson; Douglas K Price; William D Figg
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 4.742

3.  RANK ligand inhibition in bone metastatic cancer and risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ): non bis in idem?

Authors:  Tim Van den Wyngaert; Kristien Wouters; Manon T Huizing; Jan B Vermorken
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Denosumab for the treatment of bone metastases in breast cancer: evidence and opinion.

Authors:  Guenther G Steger; Rupert Bartsch
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 8.168

5.  SEOM guidelines for the treatment of bone metastases from solid tumours.

Authors:  Javier Cassinello Espinosa; Aránzazu González Del Alba Baamonde; Fernando Rivera Herrero; Esther Holgado Martín
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Targeting bone as a therapy for myeloma.

Authors:  Ping Wu; Gareth J Morgan
Journal:  Cancer Microenviron       Date:  2011-08-11

7.  From Bench to Bedside: Targeted Therapy, Denosumab, and 21st Century Orthopaedics: Targets Abound, But Where Are The Therapies?

Authors:  Benjamin K Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Clinical outcome of posterior fixation surgery in patients with vertebral metastasis of lung cancer.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Igarashi; Keigo Okamoto; Koji Teramoto; Ryosuke Kaku; Keiko Ishida; Keiko Ueda; Yo Kawaguchi; Tetsuo Hori; Masayuki Hashimoto; Shoji Kitamura; Noriaki Tezuka; Jun Hanaoka
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-17

Review 9.  Myeloma and Bone Disease.

Authors:  Cristina Panaroni; Andrew J Yee; Noopur S Raje
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 10.  Mitigating osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) through preventive dental care and understanding of risk factors.

Authors:  Jason T Wan; Douglas M Sheeley; Martha J Somerman; Janice S Lee
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 13.567

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.