Literature DB >> 7370963

Evaluation of patients with advanced cancer using the Karnofsky performance status.

J W Yates, B Chalmer, F P McKegney.   

Abstract

The Karnofsky Performance Status Scale (KPS) was designed to measure the level of patient activity and medical care requirements. It is a general measure of patient independence and has been widely used as a general assessment of patient with cancer. Although there is a long history of use of the KPS for judging cancer patients, its reliability and validity have been assumed without formal investigation. The interrater reliability of the KPS was investigated in two ways, both of which gave evidence of moderately high reliability. The patients evaluated in their home were usually assigned a lower KPS score compared with a similar evaluation at the same time done in the outpatient clinic. Costruct validity of the KPS was demonstrated by strong correlation with several variables relating to physical function. On-study KPS score accurately predicted early death, but high initial KPS scores did not necessarily predict long survival. Patient deterioration with subsequent death within a few months could be predicted to a limited extent by a rapidly dropping KPS. These results suggest that the KPS has considerable validity as a global indicator of the functional status of patients with cancer and might be helpful for following other patients with chronic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7370963     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19800415)45:8<2220::aid-cncr2820450835>3.0.co;2-q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  197 in total

1.  Use of different outcome measures in randomised studies of malignant glioma can significantly alter the interpretation of time to progression: reanalysis of the MRC BR2 study.

Authors:  J Chataway; S Stenning; N Bleehen; R Grant
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Quality of life in patients with stable disease after surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy for malignant brain tumour.

Authors:  A R Giovagnoli
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Using the modified Barthel index to estimate survival in cancer patients in hospice: observational study.

Authors:  M Bennett; N Ryall
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-02

4.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: consensus document.

Authors:  S A Khan; B R Davidson; R Goldin; S P Pereira; W M C Rosenberg; S D Taylor-Robinson; A V Thillainayagam; H C Thomas; M R Thursz; H Wasan
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Effectiveness of a clinical intervention to eliminate barriers to pain and fatigue management in oncology.

Authors:  Tami Borneman; Marianna Koczywas; Virginia Sun; Barbara F Piper; Cynthia Smith-Idell; Benjamin Laroya; Gwen Uman; Betty Ferrell
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.947

6.  Hospice referrals and code status: outcomes of inpatient palliative care consultations among Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders with cancer.

Authors:  Christina L Bell; Meiko Kuriya; Daniel Fischberg
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 3.612

7.  Does palliative chemotherapy palliate?

Authors:  Maurie Markman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  Longterm outcome of photodynamic therapy compared with biliary stenting alone in patients with advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Young Koog Cheon; Tae Yoon Lee; Seung Min Lee; Jung Yoon Yoon; Chan Sup Shim
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Geriatric assessment-identified deficits in older cancer patients with normal performance status.

Authors:  Trevor A Jolly; Allison M Deal; Kirsten A Nyrop; Grant R Williams; Mackenzi Pergolotti; William A Wood; Shani M Alston; Brittaney-Belle E Gordon; Samara A Dixon; Susan G Moore; W Chris Taylor; Michael Messino; Hyman B Muss
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-03-12

10.  Proxy-perceived prior health status and hospital outcome among the critically ill: is there any relationship?

Authors:  A Diaz-Prieto; M T Gorriz; X Badia; H Torrado; E Farrero; J Amador; R Abos
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.