Literature DB >> 28464682

Speech recognition in one- and two-talker maskers in school-age children and adults: Development of perceptual masking and glimpsing.

Emily Buss1, Lori J Leibold2, Heather L Porter3, John H Grose1.   

Abstract

Children perform more poorly than adults on a wide range of masked speech perception paradigms, but this effect is particularly pronounced when the masker itself is also composed of speech. The present study evaluated two factors that might contribute to this effect: the ability to perceptually isolate the target from masker speech, and the ability to recognize target speech based on sparse cues (glimpsing). Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were estimated for closed-set, disyllabic word recognition in children (5-16 years) and adults in a one- or two-talker masker. Speech maskers were 60 dB sound pressure level (SPL), and they were either presented alone or in combination with a 50-dB-SPL speech-shaped noise masker. There was an age effect overall, but performance was adult-like at a younger age for the one-talker than the two-talker masker. Noise tended to elevate SRTs, particularly for older children and adults, and when summed with the one-talker masker. Removing time-frequency epochs associated with a poor target-to-masker ratio markedly improved SRTs, with larger effects for younger listeners; the age effect was not eliminated, however. Results were interpreted as indicating that development of speech-in-speech recognition is likely impacted by development of both perceptual masking and the ability recognize speech based on sparse cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28464682      PMCID: PMC5391283          DOI: 10.1121/1.4979936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  43 in total

1.  Spondee recognition in a two-talker masker and a speech-shaped noise masker in adults and children.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; John H Grose; Emily Buss; Madhu B Dev
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Development and preliminary evaluation of a pediatric Spanish-English speech perception task.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Bianca Gomez; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.493

3.  Effect of response context and masker type on word recognition in school-age children and adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Perception of gated, highly familiar spoken monosyllabic nouns by children, teenagers, and older adults.

Authors:  L L Elliott; M A Hammer; K E Evan
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-08

5.  Release from multiple maskers: effects of interaural time disparities.

Authors:  R Carhart; T W Tillman; E S Greetis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1969-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  An algorithm to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel segments of the same noise type.

Authors:  Eric W Healy; Sarah E Yoho; Jitong Chen; Yuxuan Wang; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The development of the perceptual organization of sound by frequency separation in 5-11-year-old children.

Authors:  E Sussman; R Wong; J Horváth; I Winkler; W Wang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-01-20       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Linguistic Masking Release in School-Age Children and Adults.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.493

9.  Development of Open-Set Word Recognition in Children: Speech-Shaped Noise and Two-Talker Speech Maskers.

Authors:  Nicole E Corbin; Angela Yarnell Bonino; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Attention effects on auditory scene analysis in children.

Authors:  Elyse Sussman; Mitchell Steinschneider
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  16 in total

1.  Masking Release for Speech-in-Speech Recognition Due to a Target/Masker Sex Mismatch in Children With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Jenna M Browning; Emily Buss
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Virginia Best; Elin Roverud; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Todd Jennings; Kameron Clayton; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The importance of processing resolution in "ideal time-frequency segregation" of masked speech and the implications for predicting speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Christopher Conroy; Virginia Best; Todd R Jennings; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Cognitive and Linguistic Contributions to Masked Speech Recognition in Children.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Margaret K Miller; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 5.  Speech Perception in Complex Acoustic Environments: Developmental Effects.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Can background noise increase the informational masking in a speech mixture?

Authors:  Virginia Best; Christopher Conroy; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Forward and Backward Masking of Consonants in School-Age Children and Adults.

Authors:  Heather L Porter; Emily R Spitzer; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold; John H Grose
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Speech recognition for school-age children and adults tested in multi-tone vs multi-noise-band maskers.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Developmental Effects in Children's Ability to Benefit From F0 Differences Between Target and Masker Speech.

Authors:  Mary M Flaherty; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  The Clear-Speech Benefit for School-Age Children: Speech-in-Noise and Speech-in-Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Heather L Porter; Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.