Literature DB >> 7255053

Pupillary response to auditory versus visual mental loading: a pilot study using super 8-mm photography.

J S Taylor.   

Abstract

The present investigation was two-fold in purpose: to test the hypothesis that auditory mental loading would require greater mental effort and larger resultant pupillary dilation than visual mental loading, and to provide evidence for the feasibility of super 8-mm photography for pupillometric research. Subjects were 30 college students. Stimuli to be stored in memory and repeated aloud in reverse order were seven-digit number-series. Series were either presented visually from 35-mm slides or auditorily from a taped recording. Pupillary responses were recorded to the nearest centimeter on a projected image. Results did not support the hypothesis, but methodologically strong evidence supported 8-mm photography for pupillometry research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7255053     DOI: 10.2466/pms.1981.52.2.425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Mot Skills        ISSN: 0031-5125


  6 in total

1.  Pupillometry shows the effort of auditory attention switching.

Authors:  Daniel R McCloy; Bonnie K Lau; Eric Larson; Katherine A I Pratt; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory attention switching with listening difficulty: Behavioral and pupillometric measures.

Authors:  Daniel R McCloy; Eric Larson; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Pupillometry as a measure of cognitive effort in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Tepring Piquado; Derek Isaacowitz; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Cortical modulation of pupillary function: systematic review.

Authors:  Costanza Peinkhofer; Daniel Kondziella; Gitte M Knudsen; Rita Moretti
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Are Age Effects in Positivity Influenced by the Valence of Distractors?

Authors:  Maryam Ziaei; William von Hippel; Julie D Henry; Stefanie I Becker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  The Pupil Dilation Response to Auditory Stimuli: Current State of Knowledge.

Authors:  Adriana A Zekveld; Thomas Koelewijn; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.