Literature DB >> 28460199

Lymph node assessment in colorectal cancer surgery: laparoscopic versus open techniques.

G Balducci, M G Sederino, R Laforgia, G Carbotta, M Minafra, A Delvecchio, S Fedele, A Tromba, F Carbone, N Palasciano.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of our study is to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic resection (LR) and open resection (OR) for colorectal cancer surgery evaluating lymph node assessment. It may be important to remove and examine an adequate number of lymph nodes because a more extensive nodal resection has been associated to higher survival rate and lower recurrences. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 150 patients (74 females and 76 males) with colorectal cancer were enrolled and analyzed from January 2006 to March 2010 in our Unit. 100 procedures were performed with traditional laparotomy and 50 procedures laparoscopically. A strict follow-up was scheduled every 1-3-6 months after surgery and, therefore, every year.
RESULTS: Laparoscopic techniques require a longer operating time. 2484 total lymph nodes examined with a mean of 16,56 removed per resection in all procedures. 1632 lymph nodes were removed during open procedures and 852 removed during laparoscopy. The scheduled follow-up demonstrated that local recurrence and distant metastasis presented with no significant differences between two groups and overall survival and disease-free survival were assessed over 5 year in 80% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: According to our experience, laparoscopic colorectal surgery is safe and feasible, with better short-term outcomes and oncological adequacy comparable to open approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28460199      PMCID: PMC5730395          DOI: 10.11138/gchir/2017.38.1.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  G Chir        ISSN: 0391-9005


  10 in total

1.  Adoption of laparoscopy for elective colorectal resection: a report from the Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program.

Authors:  Steve Kwon; Richard Billingham; Ellen Farrokhi; Michael Florence; Daniel Herzig; Karen Horvath; Terry Rogers; Scott Steele; Rebecca Symons; Richard Thirlby; Mark Whiteford; David R Flum
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Long-term outcomes after laparoscopic colectomy.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Nicolò Pecorelli; Matteo Frasson; Andrea Vignali; Walter Zuliani; Valerio Di Carlo
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2011-03-15

3.  Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  H Jacob Bonjer; Wim C J Hop; Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; Antonio M Lacy; Antoni Castells; Pierre J Guillou; Helen Thorpe; Julia Brown; Salvadora Delgado; Esther Kuhrij; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2007-03

4.  Lymph node evaluation in colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Dan J Virnig; David A Rothenberger; Arden M Morris; Jose Jessurun; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  Personalizing colon cancer adjuvant therapy: selecting optimal treatments for individual patients.

Authors:  Rodrigo Dienstmann; Ramon Salazar; Josep Tabernero
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Cancer statistics, 2013.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Deepa Naishadham; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 7.  Assessment of lymph node involvement in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mark L H Ong; John B Schofield
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-03-27

8.  Lymph node counts and survival rates after resection for colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Sandra L Wong
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2009-03

9.  Major postoperative complications and survival for colon cancer elderly patients.

Authors:  Giuseppe Grosso; Antonio Biondi; Stefano Marventano; Antonio Mistretta; Giorgio Calabrese; Francesco Basile
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Comparison of the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kai Chen; Zhuqing Zhang; Yunfei Zuo; Shuangyi Ren
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 2.967

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Carbon nanoparticle suspension could help get a more accurate nodal staging for patient with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Wei Ge; Qiang Li; Wen-Jia Liu; Xiao-Qi Zhang; Xiang-Shan Fan; Li-Hua Shao; Liang Tao; Wen-Xian Guan; Gang Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Non-Metastatic Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Kanittha Sakolprakaikij; Kamthorn Yolsuriyanwong; Piyanun Wangkulangkul; Praisuda Bwaloy; Siripong Cheewatanakornkul
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-12-01

3.  Lymphadenectomy with venation is preferred compared to skeletonization for patients with rectal and sigmoid colon cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Wei Ge; Hai-Yan Gong; Li-Hua Shao; Gang Chen; Yu-Dong Qiu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-08

4.  Intracorporeal versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis for Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: Short-Term Outcomes.

Authors:  Antonio Biondi; Gianluca Di Mauro; Riccardo Morici; Giuseppe Sangiorgio; Marco Vacante; Francesco Basile
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-19       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.