Literature DB >> 15687365

Lymph node evaluation in colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study.

Nancy N Baxter1, Dan J Virnig, David A Rothenberger, Arden M Morris, Jose Jessurun, Beth A Virnig.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adequate lymph node evaluation is required for proper staging of colorectal cancer, and the number of lymph nodes examined is associated with survival. According to current guidelines, the recommended minimum number of lymph nodes examined to ensure adequate sampling is 12. We used data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program to determine the proportion of colorectal cancer patients in the United States who receive adequate lymph node evaluation.
METHODS: For 116,995 adults with colorectal adenocarcinoma, diagnosed from 1988 through 2001, who underwent radical surgery and did not receive neoadjuvant radiation, we evaluated the number of lymph nodes, the likelihood of receiving adequate lymph node evaluation (i.e., at least 12 lymph nodes examined), and the influence of tumor and patient factors on lymph node evaluation. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: Among all patients, the median number of lymph nodes examined was nine. Only 37% of all patients received adequate lymph node evaluation. The proportion of patients receiving adequate lymph node evaluation increased from 32% in 1988 to 44% in 2001 (P(trend)<.001, Cochran-Armitage test). Advanced tumor stage was statistically significantly associated with adequate lymph node evaluation (odds ratio [OR] of receiving adequate lymph node evaluation=2.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.18 to 2.35). Older patients (> or =71 years, OR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.44 to 0.47) were less likely to receive adequate lymph node evaluation than younger patients, and those with left-sided (OR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.44 to 0.47) or rectal (OR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.50 to 0.54) cancers were less likely to receive adequate lymph node evaluation than patients with right-sided cancers. In all analyses, geographic location was an important predictor of adequate lymph node evaluation, which ranged from 33% to 53%, depending on geographic location.
CONCLUSIONS: In 2001, the majority of patients with colorectal cancer still received inadequate lymph node evaluation. The association of demographic variables, particularly patient age and geographic location, with adequate lymph node evaluation indicates that local surgical and pathology practice patterns may affect adequacy of lymph node evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15687365     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dji020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  168 in total

1.  Lymph node harvest in colon and rectal cancer: Current considerations.

Authors:  James R McDonald; Andrew G Renehan; Sarah T O'Dwyer; Najib Y Haboubi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-01-27

2.  More is not always better.

Authors:  Luis A Carriquiry
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Ethnicity influences lymph node resection in colon cancer.

Authors:  Molly M Cone; Kelsea M Shoop; Jennifer D Rea; Kim C Lu; Daniel O Herzig
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Assessing outcomes following surgery for colorectal cancer using quality of care indicators.

Authors:  Omar Vergara-Fernandez; Carol J Swallow; J Charles Victor; Brenda I O'Connor; Robert Gryphe; Helen M MacRae; Zane Cohen; Robin S McLeod
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Practice parameters for early colon cancer management: Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Colo-Rettale; SICCR) guidelines.

Authors:  F Bianco; A Arezzo; F Agresta; C Coco; R Faletti; Z Krivocapic; G Rotondano; G A Santoro; N Vettoretto; S De Franciscis; A Belli; G M Romano
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 6.  SEOM clinical guidelines for the adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer 2013.

Authors:  J Maurel; C Grávalos; F Rivera; R Vera; E González Flores
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Recommendations for the reporting of surgically resected specimens of colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Jeremy R Jass; Michael J O'Brien; Robert H Riddell; Dale C Snover
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-11-25       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Total number of lymph nodes harvested is associated with better survival in stages II and III colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Pramodh Chitral Chandrasinghe; Dileepa Senajith Ediriweera; Janaki Hewavisenthi; Sumudu Kumarage; Kemal Ismail Deen
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-19

9.  The pathologist's role in rectal cancer patient assessments.

Authors:  Joseph E Willis
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

10.  Nodal staging score: a tool to assess adequate staging of node-negative colon cancer.

Authors:  Mithat Gönen; Deborah Schrag; Martin R Weiser
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.