Literature DB >> 19461921

Lymph node counts and survival rates after resection for colon and rectal cancer.

Sandra L Wong1.   

Abstract

It may be important that a sufficient number of lymph nodes are removed and examined at the time of resection for colon and rectal cancers. More extensive nodal resection has been associated with lower rates of cancer recurrence; allows for more accurate cancer staging and thus, more appropriate use of adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive patients; and has been associated with improved survival following resection for colon and rectal cancers. Many factors affect the number of lymph nodes examined, including extent of surgical resection, patient age, tumor location, and pathology techniques. A 12-node minimum has been endorsed as a consensus standard for hospital-based performance with colectomy for colon cancer. However, using the number of lymph nodes examined on a hospital level may not significantly influence staging, use of adjuvant chemotherapy, or patient survival. For rectal cancer, the increasing emphasis on adequate circumferential radial margins and use of preoperative radiotherapy for intermediateand high-risk tumors may complicate assessment of the relationship between number of lymph nodes examined and patient outcomes; data suggest that the number of lymph nodes (total and number positive) in a rectal specimen is significantly lower following administration of preoperative radiotherapy. While there remains little controversy about the prognostic importance of higher lymph node counts for individual patients, it is not clear that node counts are useful indicators of hospital quality.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 19461921      PMCID: PMC2684729     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res        ISSN: 1934-7820


  23 in total

1.  Pathology practice patterns affect lymph node evaluation and outcome of colon cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  V E Lemmens; I van Lijnschoten; M L Janssen-Heijnen; H J Rutten; C D Verheij; J-W W Coebergh
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Effector memory T cells, early metastasis, and survival in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Franck Pagès; Anne Berger; Matthieu Camus; Fatima Sanchez-Cabo; Anne Costes; Robert Molidor; Bernhard Mlecnik; Amos Kirilovsky; Malin Nilsson; Diane Damotte; Tchao Meatchi; Patrick Bruneval; Paul-Henri Cugnenc; Zlatko Trajanoski; Wolf-Herman Fridman; Jérôme Galon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Lymph node evaluation as a colon cancer quality measure: a national hospital report card.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; David J Bentrem; Andrew K Stewart; Mark S Talamonti; David P Winchester; Thomas R Russell; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review.

Authors:  George J Chang; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; John M Skibber; Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Impact of preoperative radiation for rectal cancer on subsequent lymph node evaluation: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Arden M Morris; David A Rothenberger; Joel E Tepper
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Impact of number of nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  J E Tepper; M J O'Connell; D Niedzwiecki; D Hollis; C Compton; A B Benson; B Cummings; L Gunderson; J S Macdonald; R J Mayer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999.

Authors:  C C Compton; L P Fielding; L J Burgart; B Conley; H S Cooper; S R Hamilton; M E Hammond; D E Henson; R V Hutter; R B Nagle; M L Nielsen; D J Sargent; C R Taylor; M Welton; C Willett
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.534

8.  For patients with Dukes' B (TNM Stage II) colorectal carcinoma, examination of six or fewer lymph nodes is related to poor prognosis.

Authors:  S Caplin; J P Cerottini; F T Bosman; M T Constanda; J C Givel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Factors affecting the number of lymph nodes retrieved in colorectal cancer specimens.

Authors:  Michelle A Ostadi; Julie L Harnish; Stacey Stegienko; David R Urbach
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  23 in total

1.  Ethnicity influences lymph node resection in colon cancer.

Authors:  Molly M Cone; Kelsea M Shoop; Jennifer D Rea; Kim C Lu; Daniel O Herzig
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Abdomino-Perineal Recto- Sigmoidectomy with Pelvic and Para-Aortic Lymph Node Dissection for Synchronous Anal and Rectal Tumor.

Authors:  Nicolae Bacalbasa; Irina Balescu; Vladislav Brasoveanu
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2015-09

3.  Impact of tumor location on lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Erman Aytac; Emre Gorgun; Meagan M Costedio; Luca Stocchi; Feza H Remzi; Hermann Kessler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  The Role of Adjuvant Therapy in Patients With Margin-Positive (R1) Esophagectomy: A National Analysis.

Authors:  Vignesh Raman; Oliver K Jawitz; Soraya L Voigt; Chi-Fu J Yang; Thomas A D'Amico; David H Harpole
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Disparity of Colon Cancer Outcomes in Rural America: Making the Case to Travel the Extra Mile.

Authors:  Vignesh Raman; Mohamed A Adam; Megan C Turner; Harvey G Moore; Christopher R Mantyh; John Migaly
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Metastatic lymph node ratio can further stratify prognosis in rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative radiotherapy: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Qing-guo Li; Da-wei Li; Chang-hua Zhuo; Guo-xiang Cai; San-jun Cai
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-03-27

7.  Establishing quality indicators for neck dissection: Correlating the number of lymph nodes with oncologic outcomes (NRG Oncology RTOG 9501 and RTOG 0234).

Authors:  Vasu Divi; Jonathan Harris; Paul M Harari; Jay S Cooper; Jonathan McHugh; Diana Bell; Erich M Sturgis; Anthony J Cmelak; Mohan Suntharalingam; David Raben; Harold Kim; Sharon A Spencer; George E Laramore; Andy Trotti; Robert L Foote; Christopher Schultz; Wade L Thorstad; Qiang Ed Zhang; Quynh Thu Le; F Christopher Holsinger
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Lymph node assessment in colorectal cancer surgery: laparoscopic versus open techniques.

Authors:  G Balducci; M G Sederino; R Laforgia; G Carbotta; M Minafra; A Delvecchio; S Fedele; A Tromba; F Carbone; N Palasciano
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb

9.  Adequacy of lymph node examination in colorectal surgery: contribution of the hospital versus the surgeon.

Authors:  Kim F Rhoads; Leland K Ackerson; Justine V Ngo; Florette K Gray-Hazard; S V Subramanian; R Adams Dudley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Prognostic influences of lymph node ratio in major cancers of Taiwan: a longitudinal study from a single cancer center.

Authors:  Yen-Lin Chen; Cheng-Yi Wang; Chin-Chia Wu; Moon-Sing Lee; Shih-Kai Hung; Wei-Chou Chen; Chih-Yao Hsu; Chia-Wen Hsu; Chih-Yuan Huang; Yu-Chieh Su; Ching-Chih Lee
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.