Satoshi Takeuchi1, Benjamin B Rothrauff1, Masashi Taguchi1, Ryo Kanto1, Kentaro Onishi1,2, Freddie H Fu3. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Kaufman Medical Building, Suite 1011, 3941 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA. 2. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Kaufman Medical Building, Suite 1011, 3941 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA. ffu@upmc.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Preoperative assessment to determine the sizes of potential autografts is necessary for individualized anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, no study has investigated the prediction of the intraoperative diameter of the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft based upon preoperative imaging. This study investigated the correlation between the intraoperative diameter of a QT autograft and in situ thickness or cross-sectional area (CSA) measured using preoperative MRI. METHODS: Thirty-one knees of 31 patients (mean age 20.9 ± 5.0 years) who underwent individualized anatomic ACLR using all soft tissue QT autograft were included retrospectively. At 15 mm proximal to the superior pole of the patella, the maximum QT thickness was assessed in the sagittal plane and the CSA was assessed at the central 10 mm of the QT in the axial plane. The angle between the axial plane and a line perpendicular to the QT longitudinal axis was used to calculate an adjusted CSA using a cosine function. Intraoperatively, each QT autograft was harvested with 10 mm width and the diameter was measured using a graft sizing device. RESULTS: Intra- and inter-observer reliabilities of all measurements using preoperative MRI were excellent (intra-class correlation coefficient, 0.833-0.970). Significant correlations were observed between the thickness, CSA, or adjusted CSA, and the intraoperative diameter (R = 0.434, 0.607, and 0.540, respectively; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The CSA correlated most strongly with the QT autograft diameter. For individualized anatomic ACLR, measuring in situ CSA can be useful for preoperative planning of appropriate graft choices prior to surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
PURPOSE: Preoperative assessment to determine the sizes of potential autografts is necessary for individualized anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, no study has investigated the prediction of the intraoperative diameter of the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft based upon preoperative imaging. This study investigated the correlation between the intraoperative diameter of a QT autograft and in situ thickness or cross-sectional area (CSA) measured using preoperative MRI. METHODS: Thirty-one knees of 31 patients (mean age 20.9 ± 5.0 years) who underwent individualized anatomic ACLR using all soft tissue QT autograft were included retrospectively. At 15 mm proximal to the superior pole of the patella, the maximum QT thickness was assessed in the sagittal plane and the CSA was assessed at the central 10 mm of the QT in the axial plane. The angle between the axial plane and a line perpendicular to the QT longitudinal axis was used to calculate an adjusted CSA using a cosine function. Intraoperatively, each QT autograft was harvested with 10 mm width and the diameter was measured using a graft sizing device. RESULTS: Intra- and inter-observer reliabilities of all measurements using preoperative MRI were excellent (intra-class correlation coefficient, 0.833-0.970). Significant correlations were observed between the thickness, CSA, or adjusted CSA, and the intraoperative diameter (R = 0.434, 0.607, and 0.540, respectively; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The CSA correlated most strongly with the QT autograft diameter. For individualized anatomic ACLR, measuring in situ CSA can be useful for preoperative planning of appropriate graft choices prior to surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Authors: Craig R Bottoni; Eric L Smith; James Shaha; Steven S Shaha; Sarah G Raybin; John M Tokish; Douglas J Rowles Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2015-08-26 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: John W Belk; Matthew J Kraeutler; Hayden A Marshall; Jesse A Goodrich; Eric C McCarty Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2018-04-05 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Michael R Boniello; Paul M Schwingler; Justin M Bonner; Samuel P Robinson; Andrew Cotter; Kevin F Bonner Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2015-02-19 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Gregory L Cvetanovich; Randy Mascarenhas; Maristella F Saccomanno; Nikhil N Verma; Brian J Cole; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Bernard R Bach Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2014-08-06 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Brent A Bickel; T Ty Fowler; John G Mowbray; Brent Adler; Kevin Klingele; Gary Phillips Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2008-09-13 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Vincent V G An; Corey Scholes; Vikram A Mhaskar; David A Parker; Brett A Fritsch Journal: Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol Date: 2017-02-27
Authors: Volker Musahl; Ian D Engler; Ehab M Nazzal; Jonathan F Dalton; Gian Andrea Lucidi; Jonathan D Hughes; Stefano Zaffagnini; Francesco Della Villa; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu; Jon Karlsson Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2021-12-05 Impact factor: 4.342