Literature DB >> 28459159

A Comparison of Time Delay in Three Continuous Glucose Monitors for Adolescents and Adults.

Manasi Sinha1, Katherine M McKeon2, Savan Parker1, Laura G Goergen1, Hui Zheng1, Firas H El-Khatib3, Steven J Russell1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The physiologic delay in glucose diffusion from the blood to the interstitial fluid and instrumental factors contribute to the delay between changes in plasma glucose (PG) and measurements made by continuous glucose monitors (CGMs). This study compared the duration of this delay for three CGMs.
METHODS: A total of 24 healthy adolescent and adult subjects with type 1 diabetes wore three CGM devices simultaneously for 48 hours: Dexcom G4 Platinum, Abbott Navigator, and Medtronic Enlite. The time delay between PG and CGM-estimated plasma glucose (CGMG) was estimated by comparing time-shifted CGMG with reference PG taken every 15 minutes.
RESULTS: The delay estimated by our approach was larger for the Navigator than for the G4 Platinum in adolescents (7.7 ± 1.1 versus 5.6 ± 0.9 min, P = .0396) and adults (10.9 ± 1.1 versus 8.1 ± 0.7 min, P = .0107). The delay was nominally longer for the Navigator than for the Enlite in both the adolescent (7.7 ± 1.1 versus 4.3 ± 1.0 min, P = .0728) and adult (10.9 ± 1.1 versus 8.3 ± 0.9 min, P = .111) populations, but these differences were not statistically significant. There was no difference in the delay between G4 Platinum and Enlite. Adolescents had shorter delays than adults for all three devices. There was a significant correlation between longer delay and increasing age for the G4 Platinum and Navigator.
CONCLUSIONS: There are differences in the estimated PG to CGMG time delays between CGM devices in the same subjects. The delay between PG and CGMG is smaller for adolescents than for adults. The PG-to-CGMG time delay is influenced by both instrument and host factors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CGM; continuous glucose monitoring; interstitial fluid; physiologic delay

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28459159      PMCID: PMC5951038          DOI: 10.1177/1932296817704443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  15 in total

1.  Assessment of transcapillary glucose exchange in human skeletal muscle and adipose tissue.

Authors:  Werner Regittnig; Martin Ellmerer; Günter Fauler; Gerald Sendlhofer; Zlatko Trajanoski; Hans-Jörg Leis; Lukas Schaupp; Paul Wach; Thomas R Pieber
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2003-04-08       Impact factor: 4.310

2.  Graphical and numerical evaluation of continuous glucose sensing time lag.

Authors:  Boris P Kovatchev; Devin Shields; Marc Breton
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Analysis of time lags and other sources of error of the DexCom SEVEN continuous glucose monitor.

Authors:  Apurv Kamath; Aarthi Mahalingam; James Brauker
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 4.  Delays in minimally invasive continuous glucose monitoring devices: a review of current technology.

Authors:  D Barry Keenan; John J Mastrototaro; Gayane Voskanyan; Garry M Steil
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-09-01

5.  Time lag of glucose from intravascular to interstitial compartment in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Ananda Basu; Simmi Dube; Sona Veettil; Michael Slama; Yogish C Kudva; Thomas Peyser; Rickey E Carter; Claudio Cobelli; Rita Basu
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-10-10

6.  Time lag characterization of two continuous glucose monitoring systems.

Authors:  Satish K Garg; Mary Voelmle; Peter A Gottlieb
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.602

7.  The nuts and bolts of achieving end points with real-time continuous glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Howard A Wolpert
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Interstitial Fluid Glucose Is Not Just a Shifted-in-Time but a Distorted Mirror of Blood Glucose: Insight from an In Silico Study.

Authors:  Claudio Cobelli; Michele Schiavon; Chiara Dalla Man; Ananda Basu; Rita Basu
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 6.118

9.  A comparative effectiveness analysis of three continuous glucose monitors.

Authors:  Edward R Damiano; Firas H El-Khatib; Hui Zheng; David M Nathan; Steven J Russell
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Time lag of glucose from intravascular to interstitial compartment in humans.

Authors:  Ananda Basu; Simmi Dube; Michael Slama; Isabel Errazuriz; Jose Carlos Amezcua; Yogish C Kudva; Thomas Peyser; Rickey E Carter; Claudio Cobelli; Rita Basu
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 9.461

View more
  13 in total

1.  Analysis of "Simple Post-Processing of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Measurements Improves Endpoints in Clinical Trials".

Authors:  Günther Schmelzeisen-Redeker
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-06-13

2.  In a Free-Living Setting, Obesity Is Associated with Greater Food Intake in Response to a Similar Pre-Meal Glucose Nadir.

Authors:  Janice Kim; Wai Lam; Qinxin Wang; Lisa Parikh; Ahmed Elshafie; Elizabeth Sanchez-Rangel; Christian Schmidt; Fangyong Li; Janice Hwang; Renata Belfort-DeAguiar
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Simple Post-Processing of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Measurements Improves Endpoints in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Morten Hasselstrøm Jensen; Claus Dethlefsen; Ole Hejlesen; Peter Vestergaard
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-05-16

4.  Realizing a Closed-Loop (Artificial Pancreas) System for the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Rayhan A Lal; Laya Ekhlaspour; Korey Hood; Bruce Buckingham
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 19.871

5.  Lag Time Remains with Newer Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology During Aerobic Exercise in Adults Living with Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Dessi P Zaharieva; Kamuran Turksoy; Sarah M McGaugh; Rubin Pooni; Todd Vienneau; Trang Ly; Michael C Riddell
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 6.  The challenges of achieving postprandial glucose control using closed-loop systems in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Véronique Gingras; Nadine Taleb; Amélie Roy-Fleming; Laurent Legault; Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 6.577

Review 7.  Monitoring of Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Brynn E Marks; Joseph I Wolfsdorf
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 8.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Brief Review for Primary Care Practitioners.

Authors:  Ramzi Ajjan; David Slattery; Eugene Wright
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 3.845

9.  Noninvasive Monitoring of Glucose Using Near-Infrared Reflection Spectroscopy of Skin-Constraints and Effective Novel Strategy in Multivariate Calibration.

Authors:  H Michael Heise; Sven Delbeck; Ralf Marbach
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-27

Review 10.  Products for Monitoring Glucose Levels in the Human Body With Noninvasive Optical, Noninvasive Fluid Sampling, or Minimally Invasive Technologies.

Authors:  Trisha Shang; Jennifer Y Zhang; Andreas Thomas; Mark A Arnold; Beatrice N Vetter; Lutz Heinemann; David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-06-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.