| Literature DB >> 28446174 |
Deepanwita Banerjee1, Dharmeshkumar Parmar1, Nivedita Bhattacharya1, Avinash D Ghanate1, Venkateswarlu Panchagnula1, Anu Raghunathan2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The leading edge of the global problem of antibiotic resistance necessitates novel therapeutic strategies. This study develops a novel systems biology driven approach for killing antibiotic resistant pathogens using benign metabolites.Entities:
Keywords: Antibiotic resistance; Flux balance analysis; Flux variability analysis; Metabolism; Metabolomic; NAD; NADH; Redox homeostasis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28446174 PMCID: PMC5405553 DOI: 10.1186/s12918-017-0427-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Syst Biol ISSN: 1752-0509
Fig. 1Schematic/work flow of experimental design – From evolution to emergence. a Adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) of antibiotic resistant populations of C. violaceum under sub-lethal concentrations of antibiotic. 5 μl of overnight culture of C. violaceum was evenly spread onto LB agar plates with respective antibiotic (10 μg/ml) and were incubated at 30 °C until colonies appeared on the agar plates. After clonal purification the resistant populations were cultured and showed characteristic violet color pigment, violacein. ChlR shows lower intensity of pigmentation while StrpR showed higher levels as compared to WT. b Primary phenotypic profiling performed to confirm the evolution of resistance against the two antibiotics using minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and violacein estimation (refer Methods for details). c Systems Biology approach used in this study with basic growth profiling, metabolite supplementation experiments, genotypic profiling using whole genome sequencing (WGS), HRMS metabolomics, and in silico structural analysis of variants and flux balance modeling using iDB149 network with constraints derived from in house data. This scalable pipeline allows understanding the genotype-phenotype relationship of the resistant pathogens
Fig. 2The evolved phenotypes of antibiotic resistance: Growth profiling and minimum inhibitory concentration typing across sensitive and resistant populations. a Growth rate on varying concentration of chloramphenicol showing a 17 and 7 fold change relative to wild type at 32 μg/mL for ChlR and StrpR respectively. b Growth rate on varying concentration of streptomycin showed no growth for WT and ChlR at 30 μg/mL and considerable growth rate for StrpR. c MIC using EzyMICTM Strips for 11 antibiotics. d Mueller Hinton agar plates showing primary resistance against chloramphenicol (Chl) and streptomycin (Str) and secondary resistance developed against piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ). ChlR shows no zone of inhibition contrary to an elliptical zone of inhibition in case of WT and StrpR. e Broth dilution method shows high MIC values for the resistant populations against the respective antibiotics that they were evolved on. Legends are Blue for WT, Red for ChlR and Green for StrpR. Means ± S.D. represented in a, b and e (n ≥ 3)
Fig. 3Systematic evaluation of microenvironment metabolite supplemented antibiotic effects on biomass, growth and viability for the three populations. a The heat map represents the exponential growth rates (measured fitness) of the WT, ChlR and StrpR populations on multiple microenvironment metabolites. The predominantly blue-scale of the wild type in presence of antibiotics (first two columns) indicate the bactericidal and bacteriostatic effect of antibiotics. The last two columns show the evolution of resistance as indicated by the increased growth rates. The Inset (d) highlights the four metabolites maleate, succinate, pyruvate and 2oxoadipate on which growth rates are minimal even for the resistant populations. b The heat map represents the maximum amount of biomass after 30 h (as cell dry weight) that is produced by the WT, ChlR and StrpR populations on multiple microenvironment metabolites. The Inset (e) highlights the four metabolites maleate, succinate, pyruvate and 2oxoadipate on which biomass was minimal. The effect of initial colony forming units was assessed by adding at the start of the culture (t0) and 6 h after growth (t6). c The heat map represents viability (as log 10 values of colony forming units/ml) after 48 h in the absence of antibiotics on rich LB media plates. The inset (f) once again confirms the effect of the four metabolites maleate, succinate, pyruvate and oxoadipate on which viability is null
Fig. 4In silico protein structure and function alterations due to altered genotypes confirmed by sanger sequencing. a- d Ab-initio models for wild type (WT) and mutant (MUT) proteins for AcrR, KdpD and PabC using ROBETTA and homology model for RpsL. e 3DLigandSite representation of the ligand binding residues (blue) including Ser238 among others, lost in the mutated variant of pabC gene as shown in (d)
Constraints used in this study for simulation of growth for the three different populations of C. violaceum using iDB149
| Model | Glucose uptake rate | Violacein secretion rate | Molar growth yield | ATPM | Biomass |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT | 9.99 | 1.49 | 0.0312 | 6.24 | 0.23 |
| ChlR | 10.532 | 0.673 | 0.0314 | 9.74 | 0.327 |
| StrpR | 12.777 | 0.702 | 0.0504 | 5.69 | 0.644 |
Units for Glucose uptake rate and Violacein secretion rate are mmol/gDW/hr whereas hr−1 for Biomass and gDW/mmol of glucose for Molar growth yield
Fig. 6Constraints-based Modeling predicts disruption of redox homeostasis and rewiring of metabolic network for compensation. a Core network representation of C. violaceum metabolism (iDB149) with tryptophan, violacein pathway (using Escher; https://escher.github.io/) and tailored biomass composition. b Reconstruction statistics and subsystem classification. c - e NADH and NAD experimental values attained for the three different strains using three different substrates – Glucose, Pyruvate and Succinate. Mean ± S.D. for triplicate samples represented
Fitness costs of antibiotic resistance on multiple substrates
| Growth Rates (hr−1) | Time Lag (hr) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metabolites | WT + chl | WT + str | WT | ChlR | StrpR | WT + chl | WT + str | WT | ChlR | StrpR |
| Glucose |
|
| 0.71 | 0.21 | 1.80 | 3 | 9.5 | 2 | ||
| Glucose-6-phosphate | 0.09 | 0.01 | 1.08 | 0.77 | 2.23 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3.5 | 2 |
| Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Fructose 1,6-bisphosphate |
| 0.01 | 1.14 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 3 | 1.5 | 6 | 10 | |
| Fumarate |
| 0.06 | 1.55 | 0.21 | 0.27 | 3 | 1.5 | 12 | 13.5 | |
| Maleic acid |
|
| 0.60 |
|
| 1 | ||||
| D-Malic acid | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.67 | 1.89 |
| 2.5 | 15.5 | 1.5 | 0 | |
| Succinate |
|
| 1.00 |
|
| 2.5 | ||||
| Oxalic acid |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Oxoadipic acid | 0.04 |
| 0.62 |
|
| 0 | 0 | |||
| Malonic acid | 0.11 | 0.03 | 1.08 | 0.45 | 0.17 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 2 | 18 |
| Pyruvate | 0.41 |
| 0.58 |
|
| 4 | 2.5 | |||
| Citric acid |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Isocitric Acid | 0.46 |
| 1.31 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 10 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 12.5 | |
| L-Lactic acid | 0.29 |
| 0.99 | 1.05 | 0.16 | 3 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 18 | |
| Ketoglutaric acid | 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.19 | 0.24 | 0.04 | 0 | 0 | 3.5 | 0 | 21 |
| L-Arabinose |
|
| 0.88 | 0.54 | 0.29 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 13.5 | ||
| Manose 6-Phosphate | 0.18 |
| 1.08 | 0.98 | 1.68 | 3 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 2.5 | |
| Ribose 5-phosphate | 0.28 |
| 0.86 | 0.33 | 0.18 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 6 | 6 | |
| 3-phosphoglyceric acid | 0.29 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.40 | 0.18 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| L-Tryptophan |
|
| 0.53 | 0.23 | 1.92 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| L-Alanine | 0.21 |
| 0.96 | 0.28 | 0.36 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 6 | 3.5 | |
| L-Valine | 0.28 |
| 0.74 | 0.33 | 0.14 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 6 | |
| L-Aspartate | 0.27 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.41 | 0.18 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 0 | 6 | 10 |
| L-Glutamine |
|
| 0.83 | 1.15 | 0.26 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 13 | ||
| L-Glutamate | 0.52 | 0.16 | 1.28 | 1.12 | 0.23 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 12.5 |
| Mannitol | 0.24 |
| 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.20 | 3 | 2 | 3.5 | 8.5 | |
| D-Sorbitol | 0.24 |
| 0.58 | 0.40 | 0.25 | 12.5 | 2.5 | 6 | 9.5 | |
| Glycerol |
|
| 0.78 | 0.28 | 1.99 | 2.5 | 9.5 | 2.5 | ||
| L-Ascorbic acid |
| 0.18 | 0.81 | 0.23 | 0.27 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 12 | |
| Luria bertani |
|
| 0.47 | 0.37 | 1.69 | 3 | 3 | 1.5 | 3 | 3 |
Altered kinetic parameters represented as Growth Rates and Time lag for the three populations of C. violaceum (WT, ChlR and StrpR) on multiple micro-environment metabolites. Zero growth rates are represented in bold
at6 initial till 180 min
bt0 initial till 180 min
ct0 first 60 min
d3 to 18 h growth
egrowth after 24 h
Summary of variants confirmed using Sanger sequencing post whole genome sequencing
| S.N. | Gene locus | Gene name | Nucleotide change | Type | Amino acid change | GENE STRETCH | Gene detail |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CV_0436 |
| G179Ta | SNP | R60L | 456,438 - > 457,085, 648 bp/215 AA | Transcription repressor of multidrug efflux pump |
| G375GATa | INS | Premature termination, 141 AA | acrAB operon, TetR (AcrR) family | ||||
| 2 | CV_4365 |
| C4648G | SNP | No Change | 708,719 - > 4,709,366 | multiple drug resistance protein |
| 3 | CV_4191 |
| G117Tb | SNP | R86S | 4,519,516 < − 4,519,887, 372 bp/123 AA | 30S ribosomal protein S12 |
| 4 | CV_3410 |
| A147deletionb | DEL | Premature termination, 226 AA | 3,703,561 < − 3,704,373, 813 bp/270 AA | 4-amino-4-deoxychorismate lyase |
| 5 | CV_1596 |
| G167deletionb | DEL | Premature termination, 682 AA | 1,719,330 < − 1,722,017, 2688 bp/895 AA | 2 component regulatory protein sensor kinase. Osmosensitive K+ channel histidine kinase KdpD (EC 2.7.3.) |
| 6 | CV_0066 | CV_0066 | G655Cc | SNP | P219A | 75,121 < − 76,422, 1302 bp/433 AA | Hypothetical protein |
| 7 | Nt CDS | nt cds | 1263524c | SNP | between CV_1197 and tRNA Ser | Cv_1197 - polysaccharide/polyol phosphate ABC transporter ATPase | |
| 8 | CV_0464 | CV_0464 | A4273Cc
| SNP | Synonymous | 478,148 - > 483,712, 5565 bp/1854 AA | Hypothetical protein, Homologous to Fibronectin type III domain protein |
Out of 57 genes and 25 non coding (Nt CDS) obtained after whole genome sequencing using Ion Torrent platform only eight of them were confirmed using capillary electrophoresis of which some were unique or common to the resistant populations
avariant confirmed in ChlR
bvariant confirmed in StrpR
cvariant confirmed in both the strains
Fig. 5The metabolic basis of antibiotic resistance through dynamic metabolomic profiling shows metabolic reprogramming. a Violacein with its differential abundances as compared to wild type in the StrpR (50% increase) and ChlR populations (50% reduction). b Prodeoxyviolacein measured only in ChlR population. c Fold change with reference to wild type population across resistant populations in their average intracellular relative abundance (log 10 values). d Temporal variation of metabolite abundances across sensitive and resistant populations (log 10 values). e The oscillatory or linear behavior with varying amplitude, period and phase lag during growth on glucose across sensitive and resistant populations. The Central Carbon Metabolism Network is drawn for quick correlation. Solid blue squares show all amino acids, Fructose-1,6-biphosphate (1,6-FDP), D-ribose-5-phosphate (R5P), D-erythrose-4-phosphate (E4P), glycerate-3P (3PG), phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), pyruvate (PYR). Yellow rounded rectangles show nucleotides. Various metabolite time profiles for the three strains are shown. All the values were normalized to the internal standard (Refer Methods for details). Graph legends: Blue – WT, Red – ChlR, Green – StrpR. Means ± S.D. represented in (a,b and e) (n ≥ 2)
Sensitivity parameters assessed using FBA - Scaled shadow prices, Logarithmic sensitivity and Maximum reduced costs
| Metabolite | Maximum Precursor Yield (M/Glc) | Shadow price in BOF (dX/dM) | Coefficient in BOF (dM) | Scaled shadow price (SSP) | Logarithmic sensitivity (LS) | |
| WT | NADPH | 0.004 | −0.0079 | 13.028 | −1.36E-04 | −0.1024 |
| NADH | 0.0061 | −0.003 | −3.547 | −7.95E-05 | 0.0107 | |
| ATP | 0.0056 | −0.0097 | 59.81 | −2.37E-04 | −0.5784 | |
| ChlR | NADPH | 0.0034 | −0.0054 | 13.028 | −5.56E-05 | −0.07 |
| NADH | 0.0101 | 2.09E-18 | −3.547 | 6.48E-20 | −7.40E-18 | |
| ATP | 0.0034 | −0.0108 | 59.81 | −1.11E-04 | −0.643 | |
| StrpR | NADPH | 0.0009 | −0.008 | 13.028 | −1.11E-05 | −0.1043 |
| NADH | 0.0017 | −0.0031 | −3.547 | −8.04E-06 | 0.0109 | |
| ATP | 0.0013 | −0.0099 | 59.81 | −1.93E-05 | −0.5895 | |
| Reaction ID | Reaction Name | WT | CHLR | STRPR | ||
| Maximum Scaled Reduced Cost | AKGDH | 2-Oxoglutarate dehydrogenase | 0 | −8.11E-07 | 0 | |
| EX_o2(e) | Oxygen Exchange | 0 | 1.106 | 0.683 | ||
| ICL | Isocitrate lyase | 0 | 0 | −4.86E-07 | ||
| PGL | 6 - Phosphogluconolactonase | 0 | −8.11E-07 | −4.86E-07 | ||
| SUCCt3 | Succinate transporter | 0 | −8.11E-07 | −4.86E-07 | ||
| PPNDH | Prephenate dehydratase | 0 | −8.11E-07 | 0 | ||
| GLCt2 | Glucose Transporter | 0 | −8.11E-07 | −4.86E-07 | ||
| Rxnvio8 | Reaction 8 of Violacein Synthesis | 0 | −6.56E-08 | −2.81E-08 | ||
FVA results showing category change in resistant strains as a function of antibiotic that involve redox cofactor balancing
| Reaction ID | Reaction formula | WT | ChlR | StrpR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEX1 | atp[c] + glc-D[c] - > adp[c] + g6p[c] + h[c] | 1 | 7 | 7 |
| PYK | adp[c] + h[c] + pep[c] - > atp[c] + pyr[c] | 7 | 1 | 1 |
| AKGDH | akg[c] + coa[c] + nad[c] - > co2[c] + nadh[c] + succoa[c] | 1 | 7 | 1a |
| MDH | mal-L[c] + nad[c] < = > h[c] + nadh[c] + oaa[c] | 1 | 7 | 1a |
| FUM | fum[c] + h2o[c] < = > mal-L[c] | 1 | 7 | 1a |
| SUCOAS | atp[c] + coa[c] + succ[c] < = > adp[c] + pi[c] + succoa[c] | 4 | 7 | 4a |
| ACKr | ac[c] + atp[c] < = > actp[c] + adp[c] | 7 | 4 | 4 |
| PFL | coa[c] + pyr[c] - > accoa[c] + for[c] | 7 | 1 | 7b |
| PTAr | accoa[c] + pi[c] < = > actp[c] + coa[c] | 7 | 1 | 1 |
| GLCt2 | glc-D[e] + h[e] - > h[c] + glc-D[c] | 1 | 7 | 7 |
| ACt2r | ac[e] + h[e] < = > ac[c] + h[c] | 7 | 4 | 4 |
| FORti | for[c] - > for[e] | 7 | 1 | 7b |
| EX_ac(e) | ac[e] < => | 7 | 1 | 1 |
| EX_for(e) | for[e] < => | 7 | 1 | 7b |
Increased TCA cycle/Oxidation Phosphorylation in the StrpR population and increased overflow metabolism population diverting from TCA cycle in the ChlR population. Of use here are Category definitions – 1 and 4 representing forced and fixed flux in either direction. 7 defined by negligible variable flux
aStrpR/WT flux fold is 0.52
bStrpR/WT flux fold is 0.32