| Literature DB >> 30608971 |
Deepanwita Banerjee1, Anu Raghunathan1.
Abstract
In the post genomic era, high throughput data augment stoichiometric flux balance models to compute accurate metabolic flux states, growth and energy phenotypes. Investigating altered metabolism in the context of evolved resistant genotypes potentially provide simple strategies to overcome drug resistance and induce susceptibility to existing antibiotics. A genome-scale metabolic model (GSMM) for Chromobacterium violaceum, an opportunistic human pathogen, was reconstructed using legacy data. Experimental constraints were used to represent antibiotic susceptible and resistant populations. Model predictions were validated using growth and respiration data successfully. Differential flux distribution and metabolic reprogramming were identified as a response to antibiotics, chloramphenicol and streptomycin. Streptomycin resistant populations (StrpR) redirected tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle flux through the glyoxylate shunt. Chloramphenicol resistant populations (ChlR) resorted to overflow metabolism producing acetate and formate. This switch to fermentative metabolism is potentially through excess reducing equivalents and increased NADH/NAD ratios. Reduced proton gradients and changed Proton Motive Force (PMF) induced by antibiotics were also predicted and verified experimentally using flow cytometry based membrane potential measurements. Pareto analysis of NADH and ATP maintenance showed the decoupling of electron transfer and ATP synthesis in StrpR. Redox homeostasis and NAD+ cycling through rewiring metabolic flux was implicated in re-sensitizing antibiotic resistant C. violaceum. These approaches can be used to probe metabolic vulnerabilities of resistant pathogens. On the verge of a post-antibiotic era, we foresee a critical need for systems level understanding of pathogens and host interaction to extend shelf life of antibiotics and strategize novel therapies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30608971 PMCID: PMC6319732 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Model statistics and subsystem wise classification for iDB858.
(A) Table for Model characteristics (B) A dot plot of the stoichiometric matrix for iDB858 with all 1330 reactions represented on X-axis and all 1004 metabolites on Y-axis. Each nonzero value is represented by a dot. (C) to (F) Pie charts representing categorization of reactions, reaction reversibility, gene protein associations (GPR) and metabolites, respectively. (G) Subsystems wise classification of the reactions present in the model.
Physiological characteristics successfully predicted by iDB858.
| Physiological function | Experimental Reference | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lactate utilization | + | Ron Taylor 2009 | |
| Acetonitrile utilization | + | Chapatwale 1988 | |
| Glycerol utilization | In house | ||
| Violacein production | + | Lichstein and Van de Sand 1945 | |
| Cyanide production | Glucose | + | Michaels and Corpe, 1965 |
| Succinate | + | ||
| Glutamate | ++ | ||
Fig 2Reconstruction of genome scale metabolic model.
BIOLOG in silico prediction accuracy by iDB858.
| Total Substrates | 95 | |
| Not in Model | 38 | |
| Present in Model | 57 | |
| True Positive | 37 | |
| True Negative | 12 | |
| False Positive | 2 | |
| False Positive | 4 | |
| False Negative | 2 | |
Experimental evidence exists,
Conflicting literature evidence
Fig 3Robustness analysis.
To understand metabolite limitation on biomass (A) and violacein (B) formation in iDB858 in glucose.
Exogenous metabolites in silico prediction accuracy by iDB858.
| Total Substrates | 30 |
| Not in Model | 1 |
| Present in Model | 29 |
| True Positive | 22 |
| True Negative | 2 |
| False Negative | 5 |
aMannitol, Sorbitol, Tryptophan, Valine and Glutamine
Experimental constraints used to define the three different population of C. violaceum.
| Model | Glucose uptake rate | Violacein | Molar growth yield | ATPM | Biomass | Biomass | Oxygen uptake rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT | 9.99 | 1.49 | 0.0312 | 6.96 | 0.25 | 0.31 | 21.58 |
| ChlR | 10.53 | 0.673 | 0.0314 | 10.67 | 0.68 | 0.33 | 9.91 |
| StrpR | 12.78 | 0.702 | 0.0504 | 6.77 | 0.92 | 0.64 | 17.03 |
aExperimental values.
bConstrain oxygen to lower the biomass predicted to match experimental biomass
Flux variability analysis (FVA) to show the effect of chloramphenicol on WT.
| Subsystem | Reaction ID | Reaction Formula | WT | WT+chl |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glycolysis | PYK | adp_c + pep_c -> atp_c + pyr_c | 0.0005 | 0.76 |
| TCA Cycle | FRD7 | succ_c + q8_c < = > fum_c + q8h2_c | 5.13 | -0.00039 to 0.00019 |
| Oxidative phosphorylation | cytochrome oxidase bo3 ubiquinol-8 | 2.5 h_c + 0.5 o2_c + q8h2_c -> h2o_c + 2.5 h_e + q8_c | 31.22 | 2.61 |
| Pyruvate metabolism | PFL | accoa_c + for_c < = > coa_c + pyr_c | -10.84 to 0.23 | -0.45 |
| PTAr | h_c + accoa_c + pi_c -> actp_c + coa_c | 0.0001 | 1.53 | |
| ACKr | actp_c + adp_c -> h_c + atp_c + ac_c | 0.0001 | 1.53 | |
| EX_for | for_e < = > | 0.0001 | 0.45 | |
| EX_ac | ac_e < = > | 0.0001 | 1.53 |
For reaction details and color code for the FVA category refer to S1 Table.
Flux variability analysis (FVA) to show the effect of streptomycin on WT.
| Subsystem | Reaction ID | Reaction Formula | WT | WT+strep |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCA Cycle | AKGDH | coa_c + nad_c + akg_c -> co2_c + nadh_c + succoa_c | 0.05 | 1.10 |
| FUM | mal__L_c < = > fum_c + h2o_c | -5.31 | -3.14 | |
| MDH | nad_c + mal__L_c < = > h_c + nadh_c + oaa_c | 5.72 | 2.04 | |
| Oxidative phosphorylation | cytochrome oxidase bo3 ubiquinol-8 | 2.5 h_c + 0.5 o2_c + q8h2_c -> h2o_c + 2.5 h_e + q8_c | 31.22 | 10.03 |
| Pyruvate metabolism | PFL | accoa_c + for_c < = > coa_c + pyr_c | -10.84 to 0.23 | -1.88 to 1.1 |
| PPS | atp_c + h2o_c + pyr_c -> h_c + pi_c + pep_c + amp_c | 0.0002 | 0.15 | |
| Purine metabolism | ATP carbamate phosphotransferase | atp_c + co2_c + nh4_c < = > h_c + adp_c + cbp_c | 0.17 | 1.10 |
| Folate biosynthesis | MTHFD | nadp_c + mlthf_c < = > nadph_c + methf_c | 0.41 | 1.10 |
| FTHFD | h2o_c + 10fthf_c -> h_c + for_c + thf_c | 0.22 | 1.10 | |
| Glutamate metabolism | ASPTA | asp__L_c + akg_c < = > oaa_c + glu__L_c | -0.63 | -1.10 |
| Glycine, Serine and Threonine metabolism | PSERT | akg_c + pser__L_c < = > glu__L_c + 3php_c | -3.54 | -1.10 |
| GHMT | gly_c + h2o_c + mlthf_c < = > ser__L_c + thf_c | -0.46 | -1.10 | |
| Arginine and proline metabolism | PRO1x | h_c + nadh_c + 1pyr5c_c -> nad_c + pro__L_c | 0.35 | 0.002 |
| SOTA | akg_c + sucorn_c < = > sucgsa_c + glu__L_c | 4e-5 | 1.10 | |
| SGSAD | h2o_c + nad_c + sucgsa_c -> 2 h_c + nadh_c + sucglu_c | 4e-5 | 1.10 | |
| SGDS | h2o_c + sucglu_c < = > succ_c + glu__L_c | 4e-5 | 1.10 | |
| AST | arg__L_c + succoa_c -> h_c + coa_c + sucarg_c | 4e-5 | 1.10 | |
| Urea cycle and metabolism of amino groups | ARGSL | argsuc_c -> fum_c + arg__L_c | 0.07 | 1.10 |
| ARGSS_1 | atp_c + asp__L_c + citr__L_c -> ppi_c + argsuc_c + amp_c | 0.07 | 1.10 | |
| AGGPR | nadph_c + acg5p_c -> pi_c + nadp_c + acg5sa_c | 0.08 | 1.10 | |
| OCBT | cbp_c + orn_c -> 2 h_c + pi_c + citr__L_c | 0.07 | 1.10 | |
| ORNTAC | glu__L_c + acorn_c < = > orn_c + acglu_c | 0.08 | 1.10 | |
| ACGK | h_c + atp_c + acglu_c -> adp_c + acg5p_c | 0.08 | 1.10 | |
| ACOTA | glu__L_c + acg5sa_c -> akg_c + acorn_c | 0.08 | 1.10 | |
| Cyanoamino Metabolism | glycine:acceptor oxidoreductase | gly_c + 2 nadph_c -> co2_c + 2 nadp_c + hcn_c | 0.28 | 1.10 |
| cyn_rxn6 | hcn_c -> acybut_c | 0.28 | 1.10 | |
| NH4+ Exchange | nh4_e < = > | -6.28 | 1.09 |
For reaction details and color code for the FVA category refer to S1 Table.
Fig 4Proton motive force (PMF) analysis using flow cytometry based membrane potential measurements for different metabolites including glucose, succinate, pyruvate, maleate and 2oxoadipate.
More than three replicates were used with a standard deviation between 0.075 (glucose) to 0.35 (2 oxoadipate).
Flux variability analysis (FVA) to show compensation in case of ChlR.
| Subsystem | Reaction ID | Reaction Formula | WT | ChlR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glycolysis | PYK | adp_c + pep_c -> atp_c + pyr_c | 0.001 | 1.44 |
| TCA | SUCOAS | atp_c + coa_c + succ_c -> adp_c + pi_c + succoa_c | 4e-5 | 0.07 |
| MDH | nad_c + mal__L_c < = > h_c + nadh_c + oaa_c | 5.72 | 0.22 | |
| ICDHyrb | nadp_c + icit_c < = > h_c + mDB_oxasucc_c + nadph_c | 0.00005 | 0.0038 | |
| Oxidative phosphorylation | cytochrome oxidase bo3 | 2.5 h_c + 0.5 o2_c + q8h2_c -> h2o_c + 2.5 h_e + q8_c | 31.22 | 14.42 |
| Pyruvate metabolism | PTAr | h_c + accoa_c + pi_c -> actp_c + coa_c | 0.0001 | 11.78 |
| ACKr | actp_c + adp_c -> h_c + atp_c + ac_c | 0.0001 | 11.78 | |
| PFL | accoa_c + for_c < = > coa_c + pyr_c | -10.84 to 0.23 | -9.58 | |
| PPC | co2_c + h2o_c + pep_c -> 2 h_c + pi_c + oaa_c | 0.0001 | 0.60 | |
| Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism | ICL | icit_c < = > succ_c + glx_c | 5.09 | -0.004 |
| Purine metabolism | ADK2 | h_c + amp_c + pppi_c -> ppi_c + adp_c | 0.0007 | 0.001 |
| Pyrimidine metabolism | CYTK1 | atp_c + cmp_c -> adp_c + cdp_c | 0.06 | 0.08 |
| Porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism | FeII oxygen oxidoreductase | 4 h_c + o2_c + 4 fe2_c < = > 2 h2o_c + 4 fe3_c | 0.00005 | -0.0007 |
| Extracellular Transport | EX_ac_e | ac_e < = > | 0.0001 | 11.82 |
| EX_for_e | for_e < = > | 0.0001 | 9.80 |
For reaction details and color code for the FVA category refer to S1 Table.
Flux variability analysis (FVA) to show compensation in case of StrpR.
| Subsystem | Reaction ID | Reaction Formula | WT | StrpR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis | PYK | adp_c + pep_c -> atp_c + pyr_c | 0.001 | 1.61 |
| TCA Cycle | AKGDH | coa_c + nad_c + akg_c -> co2_c + nadh_c + succoa_c | 0.05 | 0.14 |
| MDH | nad_c + mal__L_c < = > h_c + nadh_c + oaa_c | 5.72 | 1.58 | |
| Oxidative phosphorylation | cytochrome oxidase bo3 ubiquinol-8 | 2.5 h_c + 0.5 o2_c + q8h2_c -> h2o_c + 2.5 h_e + q8_c | 31.22 | 28.42 |
| Pyruvate metabolism | PTAr | h_c + accoa_c + pi_c -> actp_c + coa_c | 0.0001 | 11.76 |
| ACKr | actp_c + adp_c -> h_c + atp_c + ac_c | 0.0001 | 11.76 | |
| ACALD | acald_c + coa_c + nad_c < = > h_c + accoa_c + nadh_c | 0.0007 | 0.002 | |
| PFL | accoa_c + for_c < = > coa_c + pyr_c | -10.84 to 0.23 | -14.53 to 0.59 | |
| MALS | accoa_c + h2o_c + glx_c -> h_c + coa_c + mal__L_c | 5.10 | 0.51 | |
| ME2 | nadp_c + mal__L_c -> co2_c + nadph_c + pyr_c | 4.69 | 0.00004 | |
| PPC | co2_c + h2o_c + pep_c -> 2 h_c + pi_c + oaa_c | 0.0001 | 0.54 | |
| Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism | ICL | icit_c < = > succ_c + glx_c | 5.09 | 0.50 |
| Pyrimidine metabolism | CYTK1 | atp_c + cmp_c -> adp_c + cdp_c | 0.06 | 0.16 |
| Porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism | FeII oxygen oxidoreductase | 4 h_c + o2_c + 4 fe2_c < = > 2 h2o_c + 4 fe3_c | 0.00005 | -0.001 |
| Extracellular Transport | EX_ac_e | ac_e < = > | 0.0001 | 11.85 |
For reaction details and color code for the FVA category refer to S1 Table.
Constraints used for NADH oxidase (NOX) simulations for ChlR and StrpR.
| Model | Glucose uptake rate | Violacein secretion rate | ATPM | Biomass | Oxygen uptake rate | NOX | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ||||||
| ChlR | 10.53 | 0.673 | 10.67 | 0.68 | 0.33 | 9.91 | 0 |
| 0.68 | 0.33 | 26.53 | 13.2 | ||||
| StrpR | 12.78 | 0.702 | 6.77 | 0.92 | 0.64 | 17.03 | 0 |
| 0.92 | 0.64 | 31.7 | 10.31 | ||||
Flux variability analysis (FVA) category changes post NADH oxidase (NOX) addition to ChlR and StrpR models of C. violaceum.
| Subsystem | Reaction ID | WT | ChlR | StrpR | ChlR | StrpR | ChlRN | StrpR | ChlR | StrpR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCA Cycle | MDH | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| CS | 1 | 7d | 1 | 7d | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| SUCOAS | 7d | 1 | 7d | 1 | 7d | 7d | 7d | 7d | 7d | |
| FRD7 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| AKGDH | 3 | 7d | 3 | 7d | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Pyruvate metabolism | ME2 | 3 | 7d | 7d | 7d | 7d | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| PPC | 7d | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7d | 7d | 7d | 7d | |
| OAADC | 3 | 7d | 7d | 7d | 7d | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| PFL | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| MALS | 1 | 7d | 1 | 7d | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Glyoxylate & dicarboxylate metabolism | ICL | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Glutathione metabolism | AMPTASECG | 7b | 5 | 4 | 7b | 4 | 4 | 4 | 7b | 4 |
| glutathione hydralase | 7b | 5 | 4 | 7b | 4 | 4 | 4 | 7b | 4 | |
| Extracellular Transport | Ex_for_e | 7d | 1 | 7d | 2 | 7d | 7d | 7d | 7d | 7d |
For FVA category color code refer to S1 Table.
aReactions common to both resistant population
Reactions unique to ChlR
Reactions unique to ChlR when WT ATPM was used
dFVA using their respective ATPM values
eFVA using the WT ATPM value
Fig 5Gene deletion analysis.
(A) Heat map for single gene deletion (SGD) analysis for biomass precursors. (B) Heat map and table (C) for SGD analysis for 5 candidate metabolites along with glucose. (D) Heat map for double gene deletion (DGD) analysis on glucose under aerobic condition. (E and F) Unique genes involved in synthetic lethal pair interaction during DGD analysis. (G) Synthetic lethal pair interactions for two or more connectivity, highest connectivity observed in case of upper glycolysis and Entner Duordoff pathway.
Single gene deletion analysis of iDB858 on glucose under aerobic condition.
| Category | GR Ratio | Genes |
|---|---|---|
| Attenuated | 0.36 to 0.98 | 23 |
| Virulent genes | 0 | 191 |
| Avirulent genes | 0.99 to 1 | 644 |