Literature DB >> 11197252

Factors that influence the decision to do an adequate evaluation of a patient with a positive stool for occult blood.

H M Shields1, M S Weiner, D R Henry, J A Lloyd, B J Ransil, D A Lamphier, D W Gallagher, D A Antonioli, B A Rosner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The factors that influence the decision to do an adequate evaluation for a positive test for fecal occult blood in a middle-aged or elderly patient are largely unknown. Our study was undertaken to determine whether factors such as the number of positive Hemoccult II card windows, age, gender, family history of colon cancer, the patient's concern that he or she might have colon cancer, or history of rectal bleeding influence the evaluation performed.
METHOD: A mass screening program for colon cancer was performed using unrehydrated Hemoccult II cards in the Boston area.
RESULTS: Among the 23,593 Hemoccult II cards returned to Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, cards from 1,112 patients (4.7%) were found to be positive for one or more of the six possible card windows. Ninety percent, or 940 patients, over 40 yr of age had follow-up information available. As the number of positive windows increased from one to four, there was a significant trend (p < 0.001) for the adequacy of the evaluation to increase. Family history (p = 0.044) and a patient's worry that he or she might have colon cancer (p = 0.003) significantly improved a patient's chance for an adequate evaluation.
CONCLUSIONS: Hemoccult testing is not followed by an adequate evaluation in a significant proportion of patients. Our study points out for the first time that the number of positive Hemoccult windows significantly influences the decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11197252     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03475.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  21 in total

1.  Effectiveness of complete diagnostic examination in clinical practice settings.

Authors:  Masahito Jimbo; Birgit Meyer; Terry Hyslop; James Cocroft; Barbara J Turner; David S Weinberg; Ronald E Myers
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  2006-11-17

2.  Effectiveness of a provider reminder on fecal occult blood test follow-up.

Authors:  Meaghan F Larson; Cynthia W Ko; Jason A Dominitz
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Direct reporting of laboratory test results to patients by mail to enhance patient safety.

Authors:  Sharon Sung; Valerie Forman-Hoffman; Mark C Wilson; Peter Cram
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Long-term outcomes following positive fecal occult blood test results in older adults: benefits and burdens.

Authors:  Christine E Kistler; Katharine A Kirby; Delia Lee; Michele A Casadei; Louise C Walter
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-05-09

5.  Lack of follow-up after fecal occult blood testing in older adults: inappropriate screening or failure to follow up?

Authors:  Charlotte M Carlson; Katharine A Kirby; Michele A Casadei; Melissa R Partin; Christine E Kistler; Louise C Walter
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-10-11

6.  Patient and physician reminders to promote colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas D Sequist; Alan M Zaslavsky; Richard Marshall; Robert H Fletcher; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-02-23

7.  Using a multifaceted approach to improve the follow-up of positive fecal occult blood test results.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Himabindu Kadiyala; Gayathri Bhagwath; Anila Shethia; Hashem El-Serag; Annette Walder; Maria E Velez; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Reasons patients with a positive fecal occult blood test result do not undergo complete diagnostic evaluation.

Authors:  Masahito Jimbo; Ronald E Myers; Birgit Meyer; Terry Hyslop; James Cocroft; Barbara J Turner; David S Weinberg
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  Challenges in the management of positive fecal occult blood tests.

Authors:  Sandhya K Rao; Thad F Schilling; Thomas D Sequist
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Disparities in evaluation of patients with rectal bleeding 40 years and older.

Authors:  Helen M Shields; Elena M Stoffel; Daniel C Chung; Thomas D Sequist; Justin W Li; Stephen R Pelletier; Justin Spencer; Jean M Silk; Bonita L Austin; Susan Diguette; Jean E Furbish; Ruth Lederman; Saul N Weingart
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 11.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.