Literature DB >> 18691351

Lagtimes in diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer: determinants and association with cancer stage and survival.

J Wattacheril1, J R Kramer, P Richardson, B D Havemann, L K Green, A Le, H B El-Serag.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lagtimes to diagnostic colonoscopy have been used as practice performance measures. AIM: To evaluate the duration, determinants and outcomes of lagtimes between referral for endoscopic evaluation and colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis.
METHODS: We examined the medical records of 289 patients with CRC and evaluated lagtimes, their potential determinants and their association with CRC stage at diagnosis as well as overall survival.
RESULTS: Median lag between referral and CRC diagnosis was 41 days (41.5% > 60 days, 30.1% > 90 days). The only significant predictor of lagtime was the initiating event for referral: abnormal symptom, laboratory test or imaging study was associated with shortest and presence of family history was associated with longest lagtimes respectively. Longer lagtimes were associated with lower mortality risk, but this was completely explained by earlier CRC stage. An analysis restricted to 100 patients referred for abnormal CRC screening tests found no association between duration of lag and CRC stage or mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: There seems to be no meaningful association between mortality in patients with CRC and lagtimes between referral for colonoscopy and CRC diagnosis for periods up to 2-3 months. On the contrary, longer lagtimes were inversely associated with CRC stage at the time of diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18691351      PMCID: PMC2596579          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03826.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0269-2813            Impact factor:   8.171


  17 in total

1.  Progression rates of colorectal cancer by Dukes' stage in a high-risk group: analysis of selective colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Jau-Min Wong; Ming-Fang Yen; Mei-Shu Lai; Stephen W Duffy; Robert A Smith; Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

2.  Factors associated with speed of diagnosis, referral, and treatment in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C MacArthur; A Smith
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Delay in treatment in carcinoma of colon and rectum.

Authors:  D C Rowejones; S O Aylett
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1965-11-13       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  The use of screening colonoscopy for patients cared for by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Authors:  Hashem B El-Serag; Laura Petersen; Howard Hampel; Peter Richardson; Gregory Cooper
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-11-13

5.  Relationship of symptom duration and survival in patients with carcinoma of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  M Khubchandani
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Delay in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M J Turunen; P Peltokallio
Journal:  Ann Chir Gynaecol       Date:  1982

7.  Delay in diagnosis and treatment of symptomatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  H W Holliday; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-02-10       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Prognosis in relation to symptom duration in colon cancer.

Authors:  F T McDermott; E S Hughes; E Pihl; B J Milne; A B Price
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Duration of symptoms and prognosis of carcinoma of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  T T Irvin; M G Greaney
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1977-06

10.  Patient's and doctor's delay in carcinoma of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  H Graffner; S A Olsson
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.454

View more
  18 in total

1.  Reducing referral delays in colorectal cancer diagnosis: is it about how you ask?

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Laura A Petersen; Kuang Daci; Clyde Collins; Myrna Khan; Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2010-06-27

2.  The impact of diabetes process and outcome quality measures on overall survival in patients with co-morbid colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth Y Chiao; Preethi V Nambi; Aanand D Naik
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 3.  Guideline for referral of patients with suspected colorectal cancer by family physicians and other primary care providers.

Authors:  M Elisabeth Del Giudice; Emily T Vella; Amanda Hey; Marko Simunovic; William Harris; Cheryl Levitt
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Diagnosis Setting and Colorectal Cancer Outcomes: The Impact of Cancer Diagnosis in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  David Weithorn; Vanessa Arientyl; Ian Solsky; Goyal Umadat; Rebecca Levine; Bruce Rapkin; Jason Leider; Haejin In
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Determinants of medical system delay in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer within the Veteran Affairs Health System.

Authors:  Deborah A Fisher; Leah L Zullig; Steven C Grambow; David H Abbott; Robert S Sandler; Robert H Fletcher; Hashem B El-Serag; Dawn Provenzale
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Using a multifaceted approach to improve the follow-up of positive fecal occult blood test results.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Himabindu Kadiyala; Gayathri Bhagwath; Anila Shethia; Hashem El-Serag; Annette Walder; Maria E Velez; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Wait times for diagnostic colonoscopy among outpatients with colorectal cancer: a comparison with Canadian Association of Gastroenterology targets.

Authors:  Michael Sai Lai Sey; Jamie Gregor; Paul Adams; Nitin Khanna; Chris Vinden; David Driman; Nilesh Chande
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.522

8.  Do diagnostic and treatment delays for colorectal cancer increase risk of death?

Authors:  Sandi L Pruitt; Amy Jo Harzke; Nicholas O Davidson; Mario Schootman
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Consequences of Increasing Time to Colonoscopy Examination After Positive Result From Fecal Colorectal Cancer Screening Test.

Authors:  Reinier G S Meester; Ann G Zauber; Chyke A Doubeni; Christopher D Jensen; Virginia P Quinn; Mark Helfand; Jason A Dominitz; Theodore R Levin; Douglas A Corley; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  Time to Follow-up After Colorectal Cancer Screening by Health Insurance Type.

Authors:  Nancy Breen; Celette Sugg Skinner; Yingye Zheng; Stephen Inrig; Douglas A Corley; Elisabeth F Beaber; Mike Garcia; Jessica Chubak; Chyke Doubeni; Virginia P Quinn; Jennifer S Haas; Christopher I Li; Karen J Wernli; Carrie N Klabunde
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.