Literature DB >> 17031239

Colorectal cancer screening, comorbidity, and follow-up in elderly patients.

Katherine S Garman1, Amy Jeffreys, Cynthia Coffman, Deborah A Fisher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We examined the relationship between comorbid disease and performance of complete colon examination by colonoscopy or double contrast barium enema (DCBE) after positive screening fecal occult blood test (FOBT) in patients 70 years of age or older.
BACKGROUND: FOBT is an accepted form of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Factors that influence follow-up of positive FOBT have been largely unknown.
METHODS: Patients aged 70 years and older with positive FOBT between March 1, 2000 and Feb 28, 2001 were included in this retrospective medical record review performed at a single center. Comorbidity was measured by the Charlson Comorbidity Scale.
RESULTS: : In our sample of 266 subjects, 193 (73%) were referred for evaluation of positive FOBT and 109 (41%) underwent a colonoscopy or DCBE within 12 months. Using the Charlson score for comorbidity, 27% of our sample scored 0, 24% scored 1, and 23% scored 2 while 26% had a Charlson score of 3 or higher. There was no association between Charlson score (0, 1, 2, and > or =3) and referral for evaluation (chi test, P = 0.28) or performance of a complete colon examination (chi test, P = 0.38).
CONCLUSIONS: In this sample, only 41% of patients with positive FOBT underwent a full colon examination within 12 months of a positive FOBT. Although comorbidity burden was considerable, there was no association between comorbidity score and referral for or performance of a full colon examination. These results suggest that inappropriate patients receive CRC screening, which may contribute to delays for screening appropriate patients and diagnostic delays for others with positive screening test findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17031239     DOI: 10.1097/00000441-200610000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Sci        ISSN: 0002-9629            Impact factor:   2.378


  15 in total

1.  Evaluation of the use of electronic health data to classify four-year mortality risk for older adults undergoing screening colonoscopies.

Authors:  Marie B Synnestvedt; Mark G Weiner
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

2.  Barriers and facilitators to colorectal cancer screening in Vietnamese Americans: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Amanda Kimura; Mo-Kyung Sin; Clarence Spigner; Anh Tran; Shin-Ping Tu
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 3.  Bringing an organizational perspective to the optimal number of colorectal cancer screening options debate.

Authors:  Melissa R Partin; Adam A Powell; Diana J Burgess; Timothy J Wilt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Contribution of patient, physician, and environmental factors to demographic and health variation in colonoscopy follow-up for abnormal colorectal cancer screening test results.

Authors:  Melissa R Partin; Amy A Gravely; James F Burgess; David A Haggstrom; Sarah E Lillie; David B Nelson; Sean M Nugent; Aasma Shaukat; Shahnaz Sultan; Louise C Walter; Diana J Burgess
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Long-term outcomes following positive fecal occult blood test results in older adults: benefits and burdens.

Authors:  Christine E Kistler; Katharine A Kirby; Delia Lee; Michele A Casadei; Louise C Walter
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-05-09

6.  Lack of follow-up after fecal occult blood testing in older adults: inappropriate screening or failure to follow up?

Authors:  Charlotte M Carlson; Katharine A Kirby; Michele A Casadei; Melissa R Partin; Christine E Kistler; Louise C Walter
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-10-11

7.  Influence of Age and Comorbidity on Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Elderly.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Yingye Zheng; Virginia P Quinn; Elisabeth F Beaber; Carolyn M Rutter; Ethan A Halm; Jessica Chubak; Chyke A Doubeni; Jennifer S Haas; Aruna Kamineni; Marilyn M Schapira; Pamela M Vacek; Michael P Garcia; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Follow-Up of Abnormal Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening by Race/Ethnicity.

Authors:  Anne Marie McCarthy; Jane J Kim; Elisabeth F Beaber; Yingye Zheng; Andrea Burnett-Hartman; Jessica Chubak; Nirupa R Ghai; Dale McLerran; Nancy Breen; Emily F Conant; Berta M Geller; Beverly B Green; Carrie N Klabunde; Stephen Inrig; Celette Sugg Skinner; Virginia P Quinn; Jennifer S Haas; Mitchell Schnall; Carolyn M Rutter; William E Barlow; Douglas A Corley; Katrina Armstrong; Chyke A Doubeni
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Reasons patients with a positive fecal occult blood test result do not undergo complete diagnostic evaluation.

Authors:  Masahito Jimbo; Ronald E Myers; Birgit Meyer; Terry Hyslop; James Cocroft; Barbara J Turner; David S Weinberg
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

10.  Comorbidity, age, race and stage at diagnosis in colorectal cancer: a retrospective, parallel analysis of two health systems.

Authors:  S Yousuf Zafar; Amy P Abernethy; David H Abbott; Steven C Grambow; Jennifer E Marcello; James E Herndon; Krista L Rowe; Jane T Kolimaga; Leah L Zullig; Meenal B Patwardhan; Dawn T Provenzale
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.