Literature DB >> 22554783

Controlled movement processing: evidence for a common inhibitory control of finger, wrist, and arm movements.

E Brunamonti1, S Ferraina, M Paré.   

Abstract

We used the behavioral task and theoretical construct of the countermanding paradigm to test whether there is any difference between the inhibitory control of the finger, wrist, and arm. Participants were instructed (primary task) to respond to a directional go signal presented at the fovea by pressing a button with either their index or middle fingers, moving a joystick with their wrists, or reaching to a stimulus on a touch screen with their arms. They were also instructed (secondary task) to withhold their responses when a stop signal was presented on 25% of trials. The participants' ability to inhibit each of the commanded movements was captured by their inhibition probability function, which describes how withholding is increasingly difficult as the delay between the go and stop signals increased. By modeling each participant's inhibition function, we estimated that the time needed to inhibit a commanded movement was about 240 ms, a variable that did not differ significantly between the three limb segments. Moreover, we found that the best-fit model of each segment's inhibition function could fit equally well the inhibition functions obtained with the other two segments. These results provide evidence that the upper limb segments share a common inhibitory control, which may facilitate the regulation of neuronal activity within the distributed motor cortical representations and thus simplify the voluntary control of multi-segmental movements.
Copyright © 2012 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22554783     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.04.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  10 in total

1.  Corticocortical Systems Underlying High-Order Motor Control.

Authors:  Alexandra Battaglia-Mayer; Roberto Caminiti
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Atrophic degeneration of cerebellum impairs both the reactive and the proactive control of movement in the stop signal paradigm.

Authors:  Giusy Olivito; Emiliano Brunamonti; Silvia Clausi; Pierpaolo Pani; Francesca R Chiricozzi; Margherita Giamundo; Marco Molinari; Maria Leggio; Stefano Ferraina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual salience of the stop-signal affects movement suppression process.

Authors:  Roberto Montanari; Margherita Giamundo; Emiliano Brunamonti; Stefano Ferraina; Pierpaolo Pani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Inhibitory mechanisms in motor imagery: disentangling different forms of inhibition using action mode switching.

Authors:  Victoria K E Bart; Iring Koch; Martina Rieger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-05-04

5.  Inhibitory control in mind and brain 2.0: blocked-input models of saccadic countermanding.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan; Motonori Yamaguchi; Jeffrey D Schall; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Active Braking of Whole-Arm Reaching Movements Provides Single-Trial Neuromuscular Measures of Movement Cancellation.

Authors:  Jeroen Atsma; Femke Maij; Chao Gu; W Pieter Medendorp; Brian D Corneil
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Both the COMT Val158Met single-nucleotide polymorphism and sex-dependent differences influence response inhibition.

Authors:  Valentina Mione; Sonia Canterini; Emiliano Brunamonti; Pierpaolo Pani; Federica Donno; Maria Teresa Fiorenza; Stefano Ferraina
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Cerebellar damage impairs executive control and monitoring of movement generation.

Authors:  Emiliano Brunamonti; Francesca R Chiricozzi; Silvia Clausi; Giusy Olivito; Maria Assunta Giusti; Marco Molinari; Stefano Ferraina; Maria Leggio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Differences between motor execution and motor imagery of grasping movements in the motor cortical excitatory circuit.

Authors:  Hai-Jiang Meng; Yan-Ling Pi; Ke Liu; Na Cao; Yan-Qiu Wang; Yin Wu; Jian Zhang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Visual salience of the stop signal affects the neuronal dynamics of controlled inhibition.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Pani; Franco Giarrocco; Margherita Giamundo; Roberto Montanari; Emiliano Brunamonti; Stefano Ferraina
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.