Literature DB >> 12879174

Inhibitory control of eye movements during oculomotor countermanding in adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

I T Armstrong1, D P Munoz.   

Abstract

Children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are impulsive, and that impulsiveness can be measured using a countermanding task. Although the overt behaviors of ADHD attenuate with age, it is not clear how well impulsiveness is controlled in adults with ADHD. We tested ADHD adults with an oculomotor countermanding task. The task included two conditions: on 75% of the trials, participants viewed a central fixation marker and then looked to an eccentric target that appeared simultaneous with the disappearance of the fixation marker; on 25% of the trials, a signal was presented at variable delays after target appearance. The signal instructed subjects to stop, or countermand, an eye movement to the target. A correct movement in this case would be to hold gaze at the central fixation location. We expected ADHD participants to be impulsive in their countermanding performance. Additionally, we expected that a visual stop signal at the central fixation location would assist oculomotor countermanding because the signal is presented in the "stop" location, at fixation. To test whether a central stop signal positively biased countermanding, we used a three types of stop signal to instruct the stop: a central visual marker, a peripheral visual signal, and a non-localized sound. All subjects performed best with the central visual stop signal. Subjects with ADHD were less able to countermand eye movements and were influenced more negatively by the non-central signals. Oculomotor countermanding may be useful for quantifying impulsive dysfunction in adults with ADHD especially if a non-central stop signal is applied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12879174     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1569-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  39 in total

Review 1.  Adult clinical neuropsychology: lessons from studies of the frontal lobes.

Authors:  Donald T Stuss; Brian Levine
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Control of saccade initiation in a countermanding task using visual and auditory stop signals.

Authors:  D W Cabel; I T Armstrong; E Reingold; D P Munoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The ADHD response-inhibition deficit as measured by the stop task: replication with DSM-IV combined type, extension, and qualification.

Authors:  J T Nigg
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  1999-10

4.  Fixation cells in monkey superior colliculus. I. Characteristics of cell discharge.

Authors:  D P Munoz; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Countermanding saccades in humans.

Authors:  D P Hanes; R H Carpenter
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Temporal allocation of visual attention in adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  D E Hollingsworth; S P McAuliffe; B J Knowlton
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Hypofrontality in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder during higher-order motor control: a study with functional MRI.

Authors:  K Rubia; S Overmeyer; E Taylor; M Brammer; S C Williams; A Simmons; E T Bullmore
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 18.112

8.  Contextual abnormalities of saccadic inhibition in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  S Cairney; P Maruff; A Vance; R Barnett; E Luk; J Currie
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Selective effects of methylphenidate in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a functional magnetic resonance study.

Authors:  C J Vaidya; G Austin; G Kirkorian; H W Ridlehuber; J E Desmond; G H Glover; J D Gabrieli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Fixation cells in monkey superior colliculus. II. Reversible activation and deactivation.

Authors:  D P Munoz; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  28 in total

1.  Fore-period effect and stop-signal reaction time.

Authors:  Chiang-Shan Ray Li; John H Krystal; Daniel H Mathalon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Fixation offset and stop signal intensity effects on saccadic countermanding: a crossmodal investigation.

Authors:  Sharon Morein-Zamir; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Influence of history on saccade countermanding performance in humans and macaque monkeys.

Authors:  Erik E Emeric; Joshua W Brown; Leanne Boucher; Roger H S Carpenter; Doug P Hanes; Robin Harris; Gordon D Logan; Reena N Mashru; Martin Paré; Pierre Pouget; Veit Stuphorn; Tracy L Taylor; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Inhibitory control and emotional stress regulation: neuroimaging evidence for frontal-limbic dysfunction in psycho-stimulant addiction.

Authors:  Chiang-shan Ray Li; Rajita Sinha
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  The point of no return in planar hand movements: an indication of the existence of high level motion primitives.

Authors:  Ronen Sosnik; Moshe Shemesh; Moshe Abeles
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  The presence of visual gap affects the duration of stopping process.

Authors:  Giovanni Mirabella; Pierpaolo Pani; Stefano Ferraina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Functional distinction between visuomovement and movement neurons in macaque frontal eye field during saccade countermanding.

Authors:  Supriya Ray; Pierre Pouget; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Proactive inhibitory control and attractor dynamics in countermanding action: a spiking neural circuit model.

Authors:  Chung-Chuan Lo; Leanne Boucher; Martin Paré; Jeffrey D Schall; Xiao-Jing Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The countermanding task revisited: fast stimulus detection is a key determinant of psychophysical performance.

Authors:  Emilio Salinas; Terrence R Stanford
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.