Literature DB >> 28438091

Analytic Response Curves of Clinical Breast Cancer IHC Tests.

Kodela Vani1, Seshi R Sompuram1, Anika K Schaedle1, Anuradha Balasubramanian1, Steven A Bogen1.   

Abstract

An important limitation in the field of immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the inability to correlate stain intensity with specific analyte concentrations. Clinical immunohistochemical tests are not described in terms of analytic response curves, namely, the analyte concentrations in a tissue sample at which an immunohistochemical stain (1) is first visible, (2) increases in proportion to the analyte concentration, and (3) ultimately approaches a maximum color intensity. Using a new immunostaining tool ( IHControls), we measured the analytic response curves of the major clinical immunohistochemical tests for human epidermal growth factor receptor type II (HER-2), estrogen receptor (ER), and progesterone receptor (PR). The IHControls comprise the analytes HER-2, ER, and PR at approximately log concentration intervals across the range of biological expression, from 100 to 1,000,000 molecules per test microbead. We stained IHControls of various concentrations using instruments, reagents, and protocols from three major IHC vendors. Stain intensity at each analyte concentration was measured, thereby generating an analytic response curve. We learned that for HER-2 and PR, there is significant variability in test results between clinical kits for samples with analyte concentrations of approximately 104 molecules/microbead. We propose that the characterization of immunostains is an important step toward standardization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HER-2; IHControl; analyte; analytic response curve; immunohistochemistry; peptide

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28438091      PMCID: PMC5407532          DOI: 10.1369/0022155417694869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem        ISSN: 0022-1554            Impact factor:   2.479


  24 in total

1.  Synthetic peptides identified from phage-displayed combinatorial libraries as immunodiagnostic assay surrogate quality-control targets.

Authors:  Seshi R Sompuram; Vani Kodela; Halasya Ramanathan; Charles Wescott; Gail Radcliffe; Steven A Bogen
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  A novel quality control slide for quantitative immunohistochemistry testing.

Authors:  Seshi R Sompuram; Vani Kodela; Keming Zhang; Halasya Ramanathan; Gail Radcliffe; Peter Falb; Steven A Bogen
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.479

3.  Selecting antibodies to detect HER2 overexpression by immunohistochemistry in invasive mammary carcinomas.

Authors:  Agostinho Pinto Gouvêa; Fernanda Milanezi; Sandra Jean Olson; Dina Leitao; Fernando Carlos Schmitt; Helenice Gobbi
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2006-03

4.  Standardization of estrogen receptor measurement in breast cancer suggests false-negative results are a function of threshold intensity rather than percentage of positive cells.

Authors:  Allison W Welsh; Christopher B Moeder; Sudha Kumar; Peter Gershkovich; Elaine T Alarid; Malini Harigopal; Bruce G Haffty; David L Rimm
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Development of new rabbit monoclonal antibody to estrogen receptor: immunohistochemical assessment on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections.

Authors:  Zhida Huang; Weimin Zhu; George Szekeres; Haiying Xia
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2005-03

6.  Rabbit monoclonal antibodies: a comparative study between a novel category of immunoreagents and the corresponding mouse monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Sabrina Rossi; Licia Laurino; Alberto Furlanetto; Serena Chinellato; Enrico Orvieto; Fabio Canal; Fabio Facchetti; Angelo P Dei Tos
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 7.  Developing a cell line standard for HER2/neu.

Authors:  Anthony Rhodes
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.388

8.  HER2 evaluation using the novel rabbit monoclonal antibody SP3 and CISH in tissue microarrays of invasive breast carcinomas.

Authors:  Sara Alexandra Vinhas Ricardo; Fernanda Milanezi; Sílvia Teresa Carvalho; Dina Raquel Aguilera Leitão; Fernando Carlos Lander Schmitt
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Evaluation of HER-2/neu immunohistochemical assay sensitivity and scoring on formalin-fixed and paraffin-processed cell lines and breast tumors: a comparative study involving results from laboratories in 21 countries.

Authors:  Anthony Rhodes; Bharat Jasani; Elizabeth Anderson; Andrew R Dodson; André J Balaton
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.493

10.  Quantitative assays for the measurement of HER1-HER2 heterodimerization and phosphorylation in cell lines and breast tumors: applications for diagnostics and targeted drug mechanism of action.

Authors:  Lisa DeFazio-Eli; Kristi Strommen; Trang Dao-Pick; Gordon Parry; Laurie Goodman; John Winslow
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  7 in total

1.  A Root Cause Analysis Into the High Error Rate in Clinical Immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Steven A Bogen
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2019-02-22

2.  Synthetic Antigen Gels as Practical Controls for Standardized and Quantitative Immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Kathy J Hötzel; Charles A Havnar; Hai V Ngu; Sandra Rost; Scot D Liu; Linda K Rangell; Franklin V Peale
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 2.479

3.  The Importance of Epitope Density in Selecting a Sensitive Positive IHC Control.

Authors:  Kodela Vani; Seshi R Sompuram; Anika K Schaedle; Anuradha Balasubramanian; Monika Pilichowska; Stephen Naber; Jeffrey D Goldsmith; Kueikwun G Chang; Farzad Noubary; Steven A Bogen
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.479

4.  Development and Validation of Measurement Traceability for In Situ Immunoassays.

Authors:  Emina E Torlakovic; Seshi R Sompuram; Kodela Vani; Lili Wang; Anika K Schaedle; Paul C DeRose; Steven A Bogen
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  Digital Image Analysis and Quantitative Bead Standards in Root Cause Analysis of Immunohistochemical Staining Variability: A Real-world Example.

Authors:  Rebecca Rojansky; Seshi R Sompuram; Ellen Gomulia; Yasodha Natkunam; Megan L Troxell; Sebastian Fernandez-Pol
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2022-07-13

6.  Standardization of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Sandra Martinez-Morilla; Myrto Moutafi; David L Rimm
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  Quantitative comparison of PD-L1 IHC assays against NIST standard reference material 1934.

Authors:  Seshi R Sompuram; Emina E Torlakovic; Nils A 't Hart; Kodela Vani; Steven A Bogen
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 7.842

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.