Literature DB >> 33585916

Development and Validation of Measurement Traceability for In Situ Immunoassays.

Emina E Torlakovic1,2,3, Seshi R Sompuram4, Kodela Vani4, Lili Wang5, Anika K Schaedle4, Paul C DeRose5, Steven A Bogen4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immunoassays for protein analytes measured in situ support a $2 billion laboratory testing industry that suffers from significant interlaboratory disparities, affecting patient treatment. The root cause is that immunohistochemical testing lacks the generally accepted tools for analytic standardization, including reference standards and traceable units of measure. Until now, the creation of these tools has represented an insoluble technical hurdle.
METHODS: We address the need with a new concept in metrology-that is, linked traceability. Rather than calculating analyte concentration directly, which has proven too variable, we calculate concentration by measuring an attached fluorescein, traceable to NIST Standard Reference Material 1934, a fluorescein standard.
RESULTS: For validation, newly developed estrogen receptor (ER) calibrators were deployed in tandem with an array of 80 breast cancer tissue sections in a national external quality assessment program. Laboratory performance was assessed using both the ER standards and the tissue array. Similar to previous studies, the tissue array revealed substantial discrepancies in ER test results among the participating laboratories. The new ER calibrators revealed a broad range of analytic sensitivity, with the lower limits of detection ranging from 7310 to 74 790 molecules of ER. The data demonstrate, for the first time, that the variable test results correlate with analytic sensitivity, which can now be measured quantitatively.
CONCLUSIONS: The reference standard enables precise interlaboratory alignment of immunohistochemistry test sensitivity for measuring cellular proteins in situ. The introduction of a reference standard and traceable units of measure for protein expression marks an important milestone. © American Association for Clinical Chemistry 2021. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fluorescein; immunohistochemistry; in situ; microbead; reference standard

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33585916      PMCID: PMC8085580          DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvab008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  16 in total

1.  Synthetic peptides identified from phage-displayed combinatorial libraries as immunodiagnostic assay surrogate quality-control targets.

Authors:  Seshi R Sompuram; Vani Kodela; Halasya Ramanathan; Charles Wescott; Gail Radcliffe; Steven A Bogen
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Antibodies immunoreactive with formalin-fixed tissue antigens recognize linear protein epitopes.

Authors:  Seshi R Sompuram; Kodela Vani; Laurie J Hafer; Steven A Bogen
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  The Importance of Epitope Density in Selecting a Sensitive Positive IHC Control.

Authors:  Kodela Vani; Seshi R Sompuram; Anika K Schaedle; Anuradha Balasubramanian; Monika Pilichowska; Stephen Naber; Jeffrey D Goldsmith; Kueikwun G Chang; Farzad Noubary; Steven A Bogen
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.479

4.  Levey-Jennings Analysis Uncovers Unsuspected Causes of Immunohistochemistry Stain Variability.

Authors:  Kodela Vani; Seshi R Sompuram; Stephen P Naber; Jeffrey D Goldsmith; Regan Fulton; Steven A Bogen
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec

5.  Quantitative Assessment of Immunohistochemistry Laboratory Performance by Measuring Analytic Response Curves and Limits of Detection.

Authors:  Seshi R Sompuram; Kodela Vani; Anika K Schaedle; Anuradha Balasubramanian; Steven A Bogen
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 5.534

6.  Biospecimen reporting for improved study quality (BRISQ).

Authors:  Helen M Moore; Andrea B Kelly; Scott D Jewell; Lisa M McShane; Douglas P Clark; Renata Greenspan; Daniel F Hayes; Pierre Hainaut; Paula Kim; Elizabeth A Mansfield; Olga Potapova; Peter Riegman; Yaffa Rubinstein; Edward Seijo; Stella Somiari; Peter Watson; Heinz-Ulrich Weier; Claire Zhu; Jim Vaught
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Use of a monoclonal anti-estrogen receptor antibody in the immunohistochemical evaluation of human tumors.

Authors:  K S McCarty; E Szabo; J L Flowers; E B Cox; G S Leight; L Miller; J Konrath; J T Soper; D A Budwit; W T Creasman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Standard reference material for Her2 testing: report of a National Institute of Standards and Technology-sponsored Consensus Workshop.

Authors:  M Elizabeth H Hammond; Peter Barker; Sheila Taube; Steven Gutman
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2003-06

9.  The NIST High Accuracy Scale for Absolute Spectral Response from 406 nm to 920 nm.

Authors:  T C Larason; S S Bruce; C L Cromer
Journal:  J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr

Review 10.  Getting controls under control: the time is now for immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Emina Emilia Torlakovic; Søren Nielsen; Mogens Vyberg; Clive R Taylor
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  3 in total

1.  Digital Image Analysis and Quantitative Bead Standards in Root Cause Analysis of Immunohistochemical Staining Variability: A Real-world Example.

Authors:  Rebecca Rojansky; Seshi R Sompuram; Ellen Gomulia; Yasodha Natkunam; Megan L Troxell; Sebastian Fernandez-Pol
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2022-07-13

2.  Standardization of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Sandra Martinez-Morilla; Myrto Moutafi; David L Rimm
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Quantitative comparison of PD-L1 IHC assays against NIST standard reference material 1934.

Authors:  Seshi R Sompuram; Emina E Torlakovic; Nils A 't Hart; Kodela Vani; Steven A Bogen
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 7.842

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.