Literature DB >> 28425002

Beyond study participants: a framework for engaging patients in the selection or development of clinical outcome assessments for evaluating the benefits of treatment in medical product development.

Hilary Wilson1,2, Ebony Dashiell-Aje3, Milena Anatchkova3, Karin Coyne3, Asha Hareendran3, Nancy Kline Leidy3, Colleen A McHorney3, Kathy Wyrwich3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients are participating more actively in health care decision-making with regard to their health, as well as in the broader realm of assessing the value of medical products and influencing decisions about their registration and reimbursement. There is an increasing trend to include patients' perspectives throughout the stages of medical product development by broadening the traditional study-participant role to that of an active partner throughout the process. Including patients in the selection and development of clinical outcome assessments (COAs) to evaluate the benefit of treatment is particularly important. Still, despite widespread enthusiasm, there is substantial uncertainty regarding how and when to engage patients in this process.
PURPOSE: This manuscript proposes a methodological framework for engaging patients at varying levels in the selection and development of COAs for medical product development. FRAMEWORK: The framework builds on the Food and Drug Administration's roadmap for patient-focused COA. Methods for engaging patients across each stage in this roadmap are summarized by levels of engagement. Opportunities and examples of patient engagement (PE) in the selection and/or development of COAs are summarized, together with best practices and practical considerations.
CONCLUSION: This paper offers a framework for understanding, planning, and implementing methods to advance PE in the selection and/or development of COAs for evaluating the benefit of medical products. The intent is to further this important discussion and enhance the process and outcome of PE in this context.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical outcome assessment; Drug development; Medical product development; Patient centered; Patient engagement; Patient focused

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28425002     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-017-1577-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  15 in total

1.  A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research.

Authors:  Thomas W Concannon; Paul Meissner; Jo Anne Grunbaum; Newell McElwee; Jeanne-Marie Guise; John Santa; Patrick H Conway; Denise Daudelin; Elaine H Morrato; Laurel K Leslie
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies.

Authors:  Kristin L Carman; Pam Dardess; Maureen Maurer; Shoshanna Sofaer; Karen Adams; Christine Bechtel; Jennifer Sweeney
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Concept Elicitation Within Patient-Powered Research Networks: A Feasibility Study in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Authors:  Kelly P McCarrier; Scott Bull; Sarah Fleming; Kristina Simacek; Paul Wicks; David Cella; Renee Pierson
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 5.725

4.  Evaluating functional outcomes in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: development and initial testing of a self-report instrument.

Authors:  Asha Hareendran; Juliana Setyawan; Robin Pokrzywinski; Anna Steenrod; Manisha Madhoo; M Haim Erder
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute.

Authors:  Lori Frank; Laura Forsythe; Lauren Ellis; Suzanne Schrandt; Sue Sheridan; Jason Gerson; Kristen Konopka; Sarah Daugherty
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  Patient engagement in research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Juan Pablo Domecq; Gabriela Prutsky; Tarig Elraiyah; Zhen Wang; Mohammed Nabhan; Nathan Shippee; Juan Pablo Brito; Kasey Boehmer; Rim Hasan; Belal Firwana; Patricia Erwin; David Eton; Jeff Sloan; Victor Montori; Noor Asi; Abd Moain Abu Dabrh; Mohammad Hassan Murad
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Culture and Process Change as a Priority for Patient Engagement in Medicines Development.

Authors:  Marc Boutin; Lode Dewulf; Anton Hoos; Jan Geissler; Veronica Todaro; Roslyn F Schneider; Vincenzo Garzya; Andrew Garvey; Paul Robinson; Tonya Saffer; Sarah Krug; Ify Sargeant
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 1.778

8.  Patient participation as an integral part of patient-reported outcomes development ensures the representation of the patient voice: a case study from the field of rheumatology.

Authors:  M P T de Wit; T K Kvien; L Gossec
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2015-08-05

9.  The partnership of patient advocacy groups and clinical investigators in the rare diseases clinical research network.

Authors:  Peter A Merkel; Michele Manion; Rashmi Gopal-Srivastava; Stephen Groft; H A Jinnah; David Robertson; Jeffrey P Krischer
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.123

10.  Patient-reported Symptom Experiences in Patients With Carcinoid Syndrome After Participation in a Study of Telotristat Etiprate: A Qualitative Interview Approach.

Authors:  Heather L Gelhorn; Matthew H Kulke; Thomas O'Dorisio; Qi M Yang; Jessica Jackson; Shanna Jackson; Kristi A Boehm; Linda Law; Jacqueline Kostelec; Priscilla Auguste; Pablo Lapuerta
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.393

View more
  4 in total

1.  Introduction to special section: measuring what matters.

Authors:  Steven I Blum; Sara Ahmed; Emuella Flood; Frans J Oort; Carolyn E Schwartz
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes in Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases: Considerations and Future Directions.

Authors:  Christina K Zigler; Rachel L Randell; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 2.032

3.  Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: Systematic review and co-design pilot.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Lisa Hinton; Teresa Finlay; Alastair Macfarlane; Nick Fahy; Ben Clyde; Alan Chant
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 4.  Including the patient voice in the development and implementation of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Bonnie Addario; Jan Geissler; Marcia K Horn; Linda U Krebs; Deborah Maskens; Kathy Oliver; Ananda Plate; Erin Schwartz; Nicole Willmarth
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.377

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.