Literature DB >> 26797235

Concept Elicitation Within Patient-Powered Research Networks: A Feasibility Study in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Kelly P McCarrier1, Scott Bull2, Sarah Fleming2, Kristina Simacek3, Paul Wicks3, David Cella4, Renee Pierson2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore the feasibility of using social media-based patient networks to gather qualitative data on patient-reported outcome (PRO) concepts relevant to chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).
METHODS: Between August and November 2013, US-residing members of the PatientsLikeMe online CLL patient community completed open-ended web-based surveys designed to elicit descriptions of CLL symptoms, impacts, and treatment-related perceptions. Qualitative telephone follow-up interviews were conducted with a subsample of respondents. Survey responses and interview transcripts were coded for qualitative analysis using Atlas.ti.
RESULTS: Fifty survey responses were included in the analyses. Participants were age 60.5 ± 6.9 years, 54% female, and 96% white. When surveyed, 20% were receiving current treatment, 16% were in remission, and 64% were treatment-naïve. Among respondents, 369 descriptions of CLL symptoms were coded. Fatigue-related symptoms were expressed most frequently, with 54% reporting "fatigue," "tiredness," or both in their responses. These concepts were followed by night sweats (38%), swollen lymph nodes (32%), and frequent infections (28%). Among impacts of CLL, worry and fear (66% of respondents), depressed feelings (52%), and work limitations (50%) were noted most frequently.
CONCLUSIONS: Survey results identified constitutional symptoms of CLL included in existing PRO instruments and the literature. Although the findings suggest that qualitative data obtained through social media applications can be potentially useful in supporting concept identification for newly developed PRO instruments, they also indicate that online approaches alone may not be sufficient to achieve efficient and exhaustive concept elicitation. Further research is needed to identify whether the results can support content validity in the same way as established qualitative research methods.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  content validity; patient-reported outcomes; qualitative methods; social media

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26797235     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.10.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  10 in total

1.  Beyond study participants: a framework for engaging patients in the selection or development of clinical outcome assessments for evaluating the benefits of treatment in medical product development.

Authors:  Hilary Wilson; Ebony Dashiell-Aje; Milena Anatchkova; Karin Coyne; Asha Hareendran; Nancy Kline Leidy; Colleen A McHorney; Kathy Wyrwich
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Concept domain validation and item generation for the Treatment-Induced Neuropathy Assessment Scale (TNAS).

Authors:  Loretta A Williams; Araceli Garcia-Gonzalez; Tito R Mendoza; Shireen Haq; Charles S Cleeland
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  No tears in heaven: did the media create the pseudo-phenomenon "altitude-adjusted lachrymosity syndrome (AALS)"?

Authors:  Paul Wicks; Lee Lancashire
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Use of Social Media in the Assessment of Relative Effectiveness: Explorative Review With Examples From Oncology.

Authors:  Rachel Rj Kalf; Amr Makady; Renske Mt Ten Ham; Kim Meijboom; Wim G Goettsch
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2018-06-08

5.  Social media as a tool for assessing patient perspectives on quality of life in metastatic melanoma: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Amr Makady; Rachel R J Kalf; Bettina Ryll; Gilliosa Spurrier; Anthonius de Boer; Hans Hillege; Olaf H Klungel; Wim Goettsch
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Patient-Centered Insights on Treatment Decision Making and Living with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Other Hematologic Cancers.

Authors:  Rebecca Crawford; Kate Sully; Rebecca Conroy; Chloe Johnson; Lynda Doward; Timothy Bell; Verna Welch; Francois Peloquin; Adam Gater
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  A Cross-Sectional Concept Elicitation Study to Understand the Impact of Herpes Zoster on Patients' Health-Related Quality of Life.

Authors:  Desirée Van Oorschot; Ashleigh McGirr; Philibert Goulet; Patricia Koochaki; Ramya Pratiwadi; Selam Shah; Desmond Curran
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2022-01-07

8.  Using Self-Reported Patient Experiences to Understand Patient Burden: Learnings from Digital Patient Communities in Ankylosing Spondylitis.

Authors:  Prashanth Sunkureddi; Dawn Gibson; Stephen Doogan; John Heid; Samir Benosman; Yujin Park
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.845

9.  Development of a Conceptual Model of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia to Better Understand the Patient Experience.

Authors:  Daniel Eek; Matthew Blowfield; Calvin Krogh; Helena Chung; Toby A Eyre
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 3.883

10.  Information Patients With Melanoma Spontaneously Report About Health-Related Quality of Life on Web-Based Forums: Case Study.

Authors:  Rachel R J Kalf; Diana M J Delnoij; Bettina Ryll; Marcel L Bouvy; Wim G Goettsch
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 5.428

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.