Literature DB >> 28421520

Evaluation of passive sampling of gaseous mercury using different sorbing materials.

Huiming Lin1, Wei Zhang2, Chunyan Deng1, Yingdong Tong3, Qianggong Zhang4, Xuejun Wang5.   

Abstract

Atmospheric mercury monitoring is essential because of its potential human health and ecological impacts. Current automated monitoring systems include limitations such as high cost, complicated configuration, and electricity requirements. Passive samplers require no electric power and are more appropriate for screening applications and long-term monitoring. Sampling rate is a major factor to evaluate the performance of a passive sampler. In this study, laboratory experiments were carried out using an exposure chamber to search for high efficiency sorbents for gaseous mercury. Four types of sorbents, including sulfur-impregnated carbon (SIC), chlorine-impregnated carbon (CIC), bromine-impregnated carbon (BIC), and gold-coated sand (GCS) were evaluated under a wide range of meteorological parameters, including temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed. The results showed that the four sorbents all have a high sampling rate above 0.01 m3g-1 day-1, and wind speed has a positive correlation with the sampling rate. Under different temperature and relative humidity, the sampling rate of SIC keeps stable. The sampling rate of CIC and BIC shows a negative correlation with temperature, and GCS is influenced by all the three meteorological factors. Furthermore, long-term experiments were carried out to investigate the uptake capacity of GCS and SIC. Uptake curves show that the mass amount of sorbent in a passive sampler can influence uptake capacity. In the passive sampler, 0.9 g SIC or 0.9 g GCS can achieve stable uptake efficiency for at least 110 days with gaseous mercury concentration at or below 2 ng/m3. For mercury concentration at or below 21 ng/m3, 0.9 g SIC can maintain stable uptake efficiency for 70 days, and 0.9 g GCS can maintain stability for 45 days.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gaseous mercury; Passive sampler; Sampling rate; Sorbing material; Uptake curve

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28421520     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-9018-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  20 in total

1.  Atmospheric mercury monitoring survey in Beijing, China.

Authors:  Shili Liu; Farhad Nadim; Chris Perkins; Robert J Carley; George E Hoag; Yuhan Lin; Letian Chen
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.086

2.  Sorption of elemental mercury by activated carbons.

Authors:  S V Krishnan; B K Gullett; W Jozewicz
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  1994-08-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Pushing the limits of mercury sensors with gold nanorods.

Authors:  Matthew Rex; Florencio E Hernandez; Andres D Campiglia
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-01-15       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 4.  A review of passive sampling systems for ambient air mercury measurements.

Authors:  Jiaoyan Huang; Seth N Lyman; Jelena Stamenkovic Hartman; Mae Sexauer Gustin
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 4.238

5.  Spatial patterns in wet and dry deposition of atmospheric mercury and trace elements in central Illinois, USA.

Authors:  Mary M Lynam; J Timothy Dvonch; Naima L Hall; Masako Morishita; James A Barres
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Polyurethane foam (PUF) disks passive air samplers: wind effect on sampling rates.

Authors:  Ludovic Tuduri; Tom Harner; Hayley Hung
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 7.  A review of studies on atmospheric mercury in China.

Authors:  Xuewu Fu; Xinbin Feng; Jonas Sommar; Shaofeng Wang
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Development of a Cl-impregnated activated carbon for entrained-flow capture of elemental mercury.

Authors:  S Behrooz Ghorishi; Robert M Keeney; Shannon D Serre; Brian K Gullett; Wojciech S Jozewicz
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Passive air sampling using semipermeable membrane devices at different wind-speeds in situ calibrated by performance reference compounds.

Authors:  Hanna S Söderström; Per-Anders Bergqvist
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  An application of passive samplers to understand atmospheric mercury concentration and dry deposition spatial distributions.

Authors:  Jiaoyan Huang; Hyun-Deok Choi; Matthew S Landis; Thomas M Holsen
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2012-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.