Literature DB >> 23001454

An application of passive samplers to understand atmospheric mercury concentration and dry deposition spatial distributions.

Jiaoyan Huang1, Hyun-Deok Choi, Matthew S Landis, Thomas M Holsen.   

Abstract

Two modified passive samplers were evaluated at multiple field locations. The sampling rate (SR) of the modified polyurethane foam (PUF)-disk passive sampler for total gaseous mercury (TGM) using gold-coated quartz fiber filters (GcQFF) and gaseous oxidized mercury (GOM) using ion-exchange membranes (IEM) were 6.4 ± 1.4 and 15.3 ± 0.3 m(3) day(-1), respectively. The relative percent difference between TGM and GOM concentrations measured by a Tekran system and the passive samplers averaged 19 ± 14 and 13 ± 12% and ranged between 4-44 and 1.5-41%, respectively. The GcQFF and IEM substrates were also evaluated as collection media for surrogate surface dry deposition measurements. Mercury (Hg) concentration and dry deposition gradients were observed using these samplers at an urban/industrial site and compared to a rural/remote site. The Hg dry deposition rates measured by the surrogate surfaces were always higher than those calculated by a widely used inferential modeling method (1.3-50 fold). The Hg dry deposition measured at urban and suburban sites were comparable to those calculated from model. However, they were very different at a rural site, probably due to the low concentrations. Both methods are relatively low cost and will aid in understanding spatial distributions of Hg ambient air concentrations and dry deposition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23001454     DOI: 10.1039/c2em30514c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Monit        ISSN: 1464-0325


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of passive sampling of gaseous mercury using different sorbing materials.

Authors:  Huiming Lin; Wei Zhang; Chunyan Deng; Yingdong Tong; Qianggong Zhang; Xuejun Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Chemically and size-resolved particulate matter dry deposition on stone and surrogate surfaces inside and outside the low emission zone of Milan: application of a newly developed "Deposition Box".

Authors:  Luca Ferrero; Marco Casati; Lara Nobili; Luca D'Angelo; Grazia Rovelli; Giorgia Sangiorgi; Cristiana Rizzi; Maria Grazia Perrone; Antonio Sansonetti; Claudia Conti; Ezio Bolzacchini; Elena Bernardi; Ivano Vassura
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Gaseous Oxidized Mercury Dry Deposition Measurements in the Four Corners Area, U.S.A., after Large Power Plant Mercury Emission Reductions.

Authors:  Mark E Sather; Shaibal Mukerjee; Luther Smith; Johnson Mathew; Clarence Jackson; Michael Flournoy
Journal:  Atmos Pollut Res       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.352

4.  Gaseous oxidized mercury dry deposition measurements in the southwestern USA: a comparison between Texas, eastern Oklahoma, and the Four Corners area.

Authors:  Mark E Sather; Shaibal Mukerjee; Kara L Allen; Luther Smith; Johnson Mathew; Clarence Jackson; Ryan Callison; Larry Scrapper; April Hathcoat; Jacque Adam; Danielle Keese; Philip Ketcher; Robert Brunette; Jason Karlstrom; Gerard Van der Jagt
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-04-06

5.  Modeling and mapping of atmospheric mercury deposition in adirondack park, new york.

Authors:  Xue Yu; Charles T Driscoll; Jiaoyan Huang; Thomas M Holsen; Bradley D Blackwell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Passive Sampling of Gaseous Elemental Mercury Based on a Composite TiO₂NP/AuNP Layer.

Authors:  Antonella Macagnano; Paolo Papa; Joshua Avossa; Viviana Perri; Marcello Marelli; Francesca Sprovieri; Emiliano Zampetti; Fabrizio De Cesare; Andrea Bearzotti; Nicola Pirrone
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-07       Impact factor: 5.076

7.  Use of Gold Nanoparticles as Substrate for Diffusive Monitoring of Gaseous Mercury.

Authors:  Paolo Papa; Ilaria Fratoddi; Iole Venditti; Francesca Vichi; Antonella Macagnano; Emiliano Zampetti; Andrea Bearzotti
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-28       Impact factor: 3.623

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.