Literature DB >> 12387423

Development of a Cl-impregnated activated carbon for entrained-flow capture of elemental mercury.

S Behrooz Ghorishi, Robert M Keeney, Shannon D Serre, Brian K Gullett, Wojciech S Jozewicz.   

Abstract

Efforts to discern the role of an activated carbon's surface functional groups on the adsorption of elemental mercury (Hg0) and mercuric chloride demonstrated that chlorine (Cl) impregnation of a virgin activated carbon using dilute solutions of hydrogen chloride leads to increases (by a factor of 2-3) in fixed-bed capture of these mercury species. A commercially available activated carbon (DARCO FGD, NORITAmericas Inc. [FGD])was Cl-impregnated (Cl-FGD) [5 lb (2.3 kg) per batch] and tested for entrained-flow, short-time-scale capture of Hg0. In an entrained flow reactor, the Cl-FGD was introduced in Hg0-laden flue gases (86 ppb of Hg0) of varied compositions with gas/solid contact times of about 3-4 s, resulting in significant Hg0 removal (80-90%), compared to virgin FGD (10-15%). These levels of Hg0 removal were observed across a wide range of very low carbon-to-mercury weight ratios (1000-5000). Variation of the natural gas combustion flue gas composition, by doping with nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide, and the flow reactor temperature (100-200 degrees C) had minimal effects on Hg0 removal bythe Cl-FGD in these carbon-to-mercury weight ratios. These results demonstrate significant enhancement of activated carbon reactivity with minimal treatment and are applicable to combustion facilities equipped with downstream particulate matter removal such as an electrostatic precipitator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12387423     DOI: 10.1021/es0255608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  6 in total

1.  Chemistry of Trace Inorganic Elements in Coal Combustion Systems: A Century of Discovery.

Authors:  Constance Senior; Evan Granite; William Linak; Wayne Seames
Journal:  Energy Fuels       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.605

2.  Evaluation of passive sampling of gaseous mercury using different sorbing materials.

Authors:  Huiming Lin; Wei Zhang; Chunyan Deng; Yingdong Tong; Qianggong Zhang; Xuejun Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Mercury capture by native fly ash carbons in coal-fired power plants.

Authors:  James C Hower; Constance L Senior; Eric M Suuberg; Robert H Hurt; Jennifer L Wilcox; Edwin S Olson
Journal:  Prog Energy Combust Sci       Date:  2010-08-01

4.  Numerical study of the simultaneous oxidation of NO and SO2 by ozone.

Authors:  Bo Li; Jinyang Zhao; Junfu Lu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  A Magnetically Recoverable Fe3O4-NH2-Pd Sorbent for Capture of Mercury from Coal Derived Fuel Gas.

Authors:  Lina Han; Qinglian Li; Shuai Chen; Wei Xie; Weiren Bao; Liping Chang; Jiancheng Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Mercury vapor release from broken compact fluorescent lamps and in situ capture by new nanomaterial sorbents.

Authors:  Natalie C Johnson; Shawn Manchester; Love Sarin; Yuming Gao; Indrek Kulaots; Robert H Hurt
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 9.028

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.