Literature DB >> 16563580

Polyurethane foam (PUF) disks passive air samplers: wind effect on sampling rates.

Ludovic Tuduri1, Tom Harner, Hayley Hung.   

Abstract

Different passive sampler housings were evaluated for their wind dampening ability and how this might translate to variability in sampler uptake rates. Polyurethane foam (PUF) disk samplers were used as the sampling medium and were exposed to a PCB-contaminated atmosphere in a wind tunnel. The effect of outside wind speed on PUF disk sampling rates was evaluated by exposing polyurethane foam (PUF) disks to a PCB-contaminated air stream in a wind tunnel over air velocities in the range 0 to 1.75 m s-1. PUF disk sampling rates increased gradually over the range 0-0.9 m s-1 at approximately 4.5-14.6 m3 d-1 and then increased sharply to approximately 42 m3 d-1 at approximately 1.75 m s-1 (sum of PCBs). The results indicate that for most field deployments the conventional 'flying saucer' housing adequately dampens the wind effect and will yield approximately time-weighted air concentrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16563580     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.12.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  14 in total

1.  Passive sampling of polybrominated diphenyl ethers in indoor and outdoor air in Shanghai, China: seasonal variations, sources, and inhalation exposure.

Authors:  Wenliang Han; Tao Fan; Binhua Xu; Jialiang Feng; Gan Zhang; Minghong Wu; Yingxin Yu; Jiamo Fu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Simulating and explaining passive air sampling rates for semivolatile compounds on polyurethane foam passive samplers.

Authors:  Nicholas T Petrich; Scott N Spak; Gregory R Carmichael; Dingfei Hu; Andres Martinez; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 3.  The use of vegetation, bees, and snails as important tools for the biomonitoring of atmospheric pollution-a review.

Authors:  Josephine Al-Alam; Asma Chbani; Ziad Faljoun; Maurice Millet
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Evaluation of passive sampling of gaseous mercury using different sorbing materials.

Authors:  Huiming Lin; Wei Zhang; Chunyan Deng; Yingdong Tong; Qianggong Zhang; Xuejun Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Sources and potential health risk of gas phase PAHs in Hexi Corridor, Northwest China.

Authors:  Xiaoxuan Mao; Zhousuo Yu; Zhongyuan Ding; Tao Huang; Jianmin Ma; Gan Zhang; Jun Li; Hong Gao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Effect based monitoring of seasonal ambient air exposures in Australia sampled by PUF passive air samplers.

Authors:  Karen Kennedy; Miroslava Macova; Michael E Bartkow; Darryl W Hawker; Bin Zhao; Michael S Denison; Jochen F Mueller
Journal:  Atmos Pollut Res       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 4.352

7.  Calibration and evaluation of PUF-PAS sampling rates across the Global Atmospheric Passive Sampling (GAPS) network.

Authors:  Nicholas J Herkert; Scott N Spak; Austen Smith; Jasmin K Schuster; Tom Harner; Andres Martinez; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.238

8.  Organochlorine pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls in air and soil across Azerbaijan.

Authors:  Gulchohra Aliyeva; Romana Kurkova; Ivana Hovorkova; Jana Klánová; Crispin Halsall
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Effects of room airflow on accurate determination of PUF-PAS sampling rates in the indoor environment.

Authors:  Nicholas J Herkert; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 4.238

10.  Calculation of passive sampling rates from both native PCBs and depuration compounds in indoor and outdoor environments.

Authors:  Carolyn Persoon; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 7.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.