James A Holdnack1, David S Tulsky2, Brian L Brooks3,4,5, Jerry Slotkin1, Richard Gershon6,7, Allen W Heinemann8, Grant L Iverson9,10,11,12. 1. Center on Assessment Research and Translation, University of Delaware, USA. 2. Center on Assessment Research and Translation & and Departments of Physical Therapy, Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, USA. 3. Neurosciences Program (Brain Injury and Rehabilitation), Alberta Children's Hospital, Alberta, Canada. 4. Departments of Paediatrics, Clinical Neurosciences, and Psychology, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 5. Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 6. Department of Medical Social Sciences. 7. Division of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, USA. 8. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, USA. 9. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, USA. 10. Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, USA. 11. MassGeneral Hospital for Children™ Sports Concussion Program, USA. 12. Home Base, A Red Sox Foundation and Massachusetts General Hospital Program, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The National Institutes of Health Toolbox for Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function Cognition Battery is comprised of seven cognitive tests, including two tests measuring crystallized cognitive ability (i.e., vocabulary and reading) and five tests measuring fluid cognitive functioning (i.e., working memory, memory, speed of processing, and executive functioning). This study presents comprehensive base rate tables for the frequency of low scores in adults and older adults from the normative sample. METHODS: Participants were 843 adults, ages 20-85, from the NIH Toolbox standardization sample who completed all seven cognition tests. Rates of low scores were derived for standard age-adjusted and fully-demographically-adjusted scores at multiple cut-scores. Base rates were stratified by education, crystallized intellectual ability, and cognitive domain. RESULTS: Using the five demographically-adjusted fluid cognitive test scores, 45.9% of adults obtained one or more scores at or below the 16th percentile, and 16.8% obtained one or more score at or below the 5th percentile, which is consistent with findings from other neurocognitive test batteries. DISCUSSION: Based on the study findings, nearly 50% of adults in the general population would meet psychometric criteria for a diagnosis of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition (DSM-5) Mild Neurocognitive Disorder (MND). We developed new psychometric criteria for identifying MND using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery that reduce the false positive rate. Knowing these multivariate normative base rates will help researchers and clinicians interpret NIH Toolbox scores in people with neurodevelopmental, psychiatric, medical, neurological, and neurodegenerative disorders that affect cognitive functioning.
INTRODUCTION: The National Institutes of Health Toolbox for Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function Cognition Battery is comprised of seven cognitive tests, including two tests measuring crystallized cognitive ability (i.e., vocabulary and reading) and five tests measuring fluid cognitive functioning (i.e., working memory, memory, speed of processing, and executive functioning). This study presents comprehensive base rate tables for the frequency of low scores in adults and older adults from the normative sample. METHODS: Participants were 843 adults, ages 20-85, from the NIH Toolbox standardization sample who completed all seven cognition tests. Rates of low scores were derived for standard age-adjusted and fully-demographically-adjusted scores at multiple cut-scores. Base rates were stratified by education, crystallized intellectual ability, and cognitive domain. RESULTS: Using the five demographically-adjusted fluid cognitive test scores, 45.9% of adults obtained one or more scores at or below the 16th percentile, and 16.8% obtained one or more score at or below the 5th percentile, which is consistent with findings from other neurocognitive test batteries. DISCUSSION: Based on the study findings, nearly 50% of adults in the general population would meet psychometric criteria for a diagnosis of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition (DSM-5) Mild Neurocognitive Disorder (MND). We developed new psychometric criteria for identifying MND using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery that reduce the false positive rate. Knowing these multivariate normative base rates will help researchers and clinicians interpret NIH Toolbox scores in people with neurodevelopmental, psychiatric, medical, neurological, and neurodegenerative disorders that affect cognitive functioning.
Authors: Brett A Steinberg; Linas A Bieliauskas; Glenn E Smith; Robert J Ivnik; James F Malec Journal: Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2005 Sep-Dec Impact factor: 3.535
Authors: David J Schretlen; S Marc Testa; Jessica M Winicki; Godfrey D Pearlson; Barry Gordon Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Kaitlin B Casaletto; Anya Umlauf; Jennifer Beaumont; Richard Gershon; Jerry Slotkin; Natacha Akshoomoff; Robert K Heaton Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2015-06-01 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Dan Mungas; Robert Heaton; David Tulsky; Philip David Zelazo; Jerry Slotkin; David Blitz; Jin-Shei Lai; Richard Gershon Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2014-06-24 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Sandra Weintraub; Sureyya S Dikmen; Robert K Heaton; David S Tulsky; Philip D Zelazo; Patricia J Bauer; Noelle E Carlozzi; Jerry Slotkin; David Blitz; Kathleen Wallner-Allen; Nathan A Fox; Jennifer L Beaumont; Dan Mungas; Cindy J Nowinski; Jennifer Richler; Joanne A Deocampo; Jacob E Anderson; Jennifer J Manly; Beth Borosh; Richard Havlik; Kevin Conway; Emmeline Edwards; Lisa Freund; Jonathan W King; Claudia Moy; Ellen Witt; Richard C Gershon Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-03-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Kelly L Sinclair; Jennie L Ponsford; Shantha M W Rajaratnam; Clare Anderson Journal: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol Date: 2013-02-07 Impact factor: 2.475
Authors: Richard E Pratley; Lauren G Kanapka; Michael R Rickels; Andrew Ahmann; Grazia Aleppo; Roy Beck; Anuj Bhargava; Bruce W Bode; Anders Carlson; Naomi S Chaytor; D Steven Fox; Robin Goland; Irl B Hirsch; Davida Kruger; Yogish C Kudva; Carol Levy; Janet B McGill; Anne Peters; Louis Philipson; Athena Philis-Tsimikas; Rodica Pop-Busui; Viral N Shah; Michael Thompson; Francesco Vendrame; Alandra Verdejo; Ruth S Weinstock; Laura Young; Kellee M Miller Journal: JAMA Date: 2020-06-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Parul Sinha; Alex W K Wong; Dorina Kallogjeri; Jay F Piccirillo Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: William Perry; Laura Lacritz; Tresa Roebuck-Spencer; Cheryl Silver; Robert L Denney; John Meyers; Charles E McConnel; Neil Pliskin; Deb Adler; Christopher Alban; Mark Bondi; Michelle Braun; Xavier Cagigas; Morgan Daven; Lisa Drozdick; Norman L Foster; Ula Hwang; Laurie Ivey; Grant Iverson; Joel Kramer; Melinda Lantz; Lisa Latts; Shari M Ling; Ana Maria Lopez; Michael Malone; Lori Martin-Plank; Katie Maslow; Don Melady; Melissa Messer; Randi Most; Margaret P Norris; David Shafer; Nina Silverberg; Colin M Thomas; Laura Thornhill; Jean Tsai; Nirav Vakharia; Martin Waters; Tamara Golden Journal: Arch Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 2.813
Authors: William Perry; Laura Lacritz; Tresa Roebuck-Spencer; Cheryl Silver; Robert L Denney; John Meyers; Charles E McConnel; Neil Pliskin; Deb Adler; Christopher Alban; Mark Bondi; Michelle Braun; Xavier Cagigas; Morgan Daven; Lisa Drozdick; Norman L Foster; Ula Hwang; Laurie Ivey; Grant Iverson; Joel Kramer; Melinda Lantz; Lisa Latts; Shari M Ling; Ana Maria Lopez; Michael Malone; Lori Martin-Plank; Katie Maslow; Don Melady; Melissa Messer; Randi Most; Margaret P Norris; David Shafer; Nina Silverberg; Colin M Thomas; Laura Thornhill; Jean Tsai; Nirav Vakharia; Martin Waters; Tamara Golden Journal: Innov Aging Date: 2018-10-12