Andrew M Kiselica1, Troy A Webber2, Jared F Benge1. 1. Department of Neurology, Baylor Scott and White Health. 2. Mental Health Care Line, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Low neuropsychological test scores are commonly observed even in cognitively healthy older adults. For batteries designed to assess for and track cognitive decline in older adults, documenting the multivariate base rates (MBRs) of low scores is important to differentiate expected from abnormal low score patterns. Additionally, it is important for our understanding of mild cognitive impairment and preclinical declines to and determine how such score patterns predict future clinical states. METHOD: The current study utilized Uniform Data Set Neuropsychological Battery 3.0 (UDS3NB) data for 5,870 English-speaking, older adult participants from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center from 39 Alzheimer's disease Research Centers from March 2015 to December 2018. MBRs of low scores were identified for 2,608 cognitively healthy participants that had completed all cognitive measures. The association of abnormal MBR patterns with subsequent conversion to mild cognitive impairment and dementia were explored. RESULTS: Depending on the operationalization of "low" score, the MBR of demographically adjusted scores ranged from 1.40 to 79.2%. Posttest probabilities using MBR methods to predict dementia status at 2-year follow up ranged from .06 to .33, while posttest probabilities for conversion to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) ranged from .12-.32. CONCLUSIONS: The data confirm that abnormal cognitive test scores are common among cognitively normal older adults. Using MBR criteria may improve our understanding of MCI. They may also be used to enrich clinical trial selection processes through recruitment of at-risk individuals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
OBJECTIVE: Low neuropsychological test scores are commonly observed even in cognitively healthy older adults. For batteries designed to assess for and track cognitive decline in older adults, documenting the multivariate base rates (MBRs) of low scores is important to differentiate expected from abnormal low score patterns. Additionally, it is important for our understanding of mild cognitive impairment and preclinical declines to and determine how such score patterns predict future clinical states. METHOD: The current study utilized Uniform Data Set Neuropsychological Battery 3.0 (UDS3NB) data for 5,870 English-speaking, older adult participants from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center from 39 Alzheimer's disease Research Centers from March 2015 to December 2018. MBRs of low scores were identified for 2,608 cognitively healthy participants that had completed all cognitive measures. The association of abnormal MBR patterns with subsequent conversion to mild cognitive impairment and dementia were explored. RESULTS: Depending on the operationalization of "low" score, the MBR of demographically adjusted scores ranged from 1.40 to 79.2%. Posttest probabilities using MBR methods to predict dementia status at 2-year follow up ranged from .06 to .33, while posttest probabilities for conversion to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) ranged from .12-.32. CONCLUSIONS: The data confirm that abnormal cognitive test scores are common among cognitively normal older adults. Using MBR criteria may improve our understanding of MCI. They may also be used to enrich clinical trial selection processes through recruitment of at-risk individuals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Irene Litvan; Jennifer G Goldman; Alexander I Tröster; Ben A Schmand; Daniel Weintraub; Ronald C Petersen; Brit Mollenhauer; Charles H Adler; Karen Marder; Caroline H Williams-Gray; Dag Aarsland; Jaime Kulisevsky; Maria C Rodriguez-Oroz; David J Burn; Roger A Barker; Murat Emre Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2012-01-24 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: David J Schretlen; S Marc Testa; Jessica M Winicki; Godfrey D Pearlson; Barry Gordon Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: S Craft; J Newcomer; S Kanne; S Dagogo-Jack; P Cryer; Y Sheline; J Luby; A Dagogo-Jack; A Alderson Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 1996 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Thomas J Guilmette; Jerry J Sweet; Nancy Hebben; Deborah Koltai; E Mark Mahone; Brenda J Spiegler; Kirk Stucky; Michael Westerveld Journal: Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2020-02-10 Impact factor: 3.535
Authors: S E Bleeker; H A Moll; E W Steyerberg; A R T Donders; G Derksen-Lubsen; D E Grobbee; K G M Moons Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: RoShunna Lea; Jared F Benge; Charles H Adler; Thomas G Beach; Christine M Belden; Nan Zhang; Holly A Shill; Erika Driver-Dunckley; Shyamal H Mehta; Alireza Atri Journal: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol Date: 2022-02-09 Impact factor: 2.475
Authors: Alexandra Polcher; Steffen Wolfsgruber; Oliver Peters; Lutz Frölich; Jens Wiltfang; Johannes Kornhuber; Michael Hüll; Eckart Rüther; Piotr Lewczuk; Wolfgang Maier; Frank Jessen; Michael Wagner Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2022 Impact factor: 4.160