Literature DB >> 29710116

Baseline Cognition Assessment Among Patients With Oropharyngeal Cancer Using PROMIS and NIH Toolbox.

Parul Sinha1, Alex W K Wong2, Dorina Kallogjeri1, Jay F Piccirillo1.   

Abstract

Importance: Cognitive dysfunction (CD) is recognized by the American Cancer Society as a treatment effect in head and neck cancer, but the extent of this problem at baseline in oropharyngeal cancer (OPC), the most common subsite in current practice, to our knowledge has never been studied. Objective: To assess the baseline cognition of patients with OPC using National Institutes of Health (NIH)-sponsored instruments of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery (NIHTB-CB). Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a prospective cohort study conducted at a tertiary academic center. Of 83 consecutive patients, newly diagnosed as having OPC from September 2016 to May 2017, 16 were ineligible, 8 refused to participate, and 3 were lost to follow-up after screening, resulting in 56 study participants. Main Outcomes and Measures: Self-perceived and objective cognition with PROMIS and NIHTB-CB standardized T scores, respectively, were main outcomes. Impairment was defined as (1) T scores less than 0.5 SD for PROMIS; (2) T score less than 1.5 SD in at least 1 cognitive domain or less than 1 SD in 2 or more domains for NIHTB-CB total cognition; and (3) T score per previously published criteria for NIHTB-CB intelligence-stratified cognition.
Results: Of the 56 study participants (52 men, 4 women; median age, 59 years [range, 42-77 years]), 19 (34%) had a college degree, and 20 (36%) had a professional or technical occupation. Thirty (about 53%) were never-smokers, 26 (46%) were never-drinkers, 29 (52%) were obese, 13 (23%) had a moderate to severe comorbidity, 3 (5%) used antidepressants, and 25 (52%) had hearing loss. Impaired self-reported, NIHTB-CB total, and intelligence-stratified cognition scores were observed in 6 (11%), 18 (32%), and 12 (21%), respectively. Among all variables, objective impairment was more common in men (23% vs 0%) and those with p16-negative OPC (33% vs 20%), moderate to severe comorbidity (31% vs 18%), and hearing loss (31% vs 12%). Conclusions and Relevance: Impaired objective cognition was more common at baseline than self-reported, and was more frequent in men, participants with p16-negative OPC, moderate to severe comorbidity, and hearing loss. NIHTB-CB allowed immediate scoring of demographically adjusted cognitive function. In clinical practice, these scores can be used to identify patients with impaired cognition at baseline who may be susceptible to developing further impairment after treatment. Identification of impairment at baseline will help to institute early cognitive interventions, which may lead to an improved posttreatment quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29710116      PMCID: PMC6248179          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.0283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  59 in total

1.  Relationship between intelligence and vocabulary.

Authors:  Billy L Smith; Teresa D Smith; Loria Taylor; Melissa Hobby
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2005-02

2.  Clinical Assessment of Cognitive Function in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: Prevalence and Correlates.

Authors:  Amy M Williams; Jamie Lindholm; Farzan Siddiqui; Tamer A Ghanem; Steven S Chang
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Neuropsychological function in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy.

Authors:  M S Hua; S T Chen; L M Tang; W M Leung
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.475

4.  Construct validity of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in individuals with stroke.

Authors:  Noelle E Carlozzi; David S Tulsky; Timothy J Wolf; Siera Goodnight; Robert K Heaton; Kaitlin B Casaletto; Alex W K Wong; Carolyn M Baum; Richard C Gershon; Allen W Heinemann
Journal:  Rehabil Psychol       Date:  2017-11

5.  Survivorship: cognitive function, version 1.2014.

Authors:  Crystal S Denlinger; Jennifer A Ligibel; Madhuri Are; K Scott Baker; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Debra L Friedman; Mindy Goldman; Lee Jones; Allison King; Grace H Ku; Elizabeth Kvale; Terry S Langbaum; Kristin Leonardi-Warren; Mary S McCabe; Michelle Melisko; Jose G Montoya; Kathi Mooney; Mary Ann Morgan; Javid J Moslehi; Tracey O'Connor; Linda Overholser; Electra D Paskett; Muhammad Raza; Karen L Syrjala; Susan G Urba; Mark T Wakabayashi; Phyllis Zee; Nicole R McMillian; Deborah A Freedman-Cass
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 11.908

6.  Cognition assessment using the NIH Toolbox.

Authors:  Sandra Weintraub; Sureyya S Dikmen; Robert K Heaton; David S Tulsky; Philip D Zelazo; Patricia J Bauer; Noelle E Carlozzi; Jerry Slotkin; David Blitz; Kathleen Wallner-Allen; Nathan A Fox; Jennifer L Beaumont; Dan Mungas; Cindy J Nowinski; Jennifer Richler; Joanne A Deocampo; Jacob E Anderson; Jennifer J Manly; Beth Borosh; Richard Havlik; Kevin Conway; Emmeline Edwards; Lisa Freund; Jonathan W King; Claudia Moy; Ellen Witt; Richard C Gershon
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Progress of memory function after radiation therapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Linda C W Lam; S F Leung; Y L Chan
Journal:  J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.198

Review 8.  Chemotherapy and cognitive deficits: mechanisms, findings, and potential interventions.

Authors:  Christian J Nelson; Nina Nandy; Andrew J Roth
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2007-09

9.  Prognostic importance of comorbidity in a hospital-based cancer registry.

Authors:  Jay F Piccirillo; Ryan M Tierney; Irene Costas; Lori Grove; Edward L Spitznagel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Patients With Cancer.

Authors:  Sheena Daniels
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb
View more
  12 in total

1.  Psychometric Properties of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in Healthy Older Adults: Reliability, Validity, and Agreement with Standard Neuropsychological Tests.

Authors:  Emmi P Scott; Anne Sorrell; Andreana Benitez
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.892

2.  Integrating geriatric assessment into routine gastrointestinal (GI) consultation: The Cancer and Aging Resilience Evaluation (CARE).

Authors:  Grant R Williams; Kelly M Kenzik; Mariel Parman; Mustafa Al-Obaidi; Liton Francisco; Gabrielle B Rocque; Andrew McDonald; Ravi Paluri; Rudolph M Navari; Lakshmin Nandagopal; Olumide Gbolahan; Crystal Young-Smith; Matthew Robertson; Smita Bhatia
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 3.599

3.  Vigorous physical activity and mental health-Associations suggest a link among childhood cancer survivors.

Authors:  Jennifer R Bail; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Longitudinal changes in patient-reported cognitive complaints among older adults with gastrointestinal malignancies - results from the Cancer and Aging Resilience Evaluation (CARE) Registry.

Authors:  Mackenzie E Fowler; Donna Murdaugh; Christian Harmon; Mustafa Al-Obaidi; Noha Sharafeldin; Smita Bhatia; Smith Giri; Grant R Williams
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 4.062

5.  Assessing Physical and Cognitive Function in Individuals With Head and Neck Cancer: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Moira A Visovatti; Mi Sook Jung; Heidi Mason; Mary Beth DeRubeis; Francis P Worden; Debra L Barton
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.760

6.  Reliability and validity of a novel cognitive self-assessment tool for patients with cancer.

Authors:  Giuliana V Zarrella; Alice Perez; Jorg Dietrich; Michael W Parsons
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2021-07-21

7.  Patient-reported cognitive complaints in older adults with gastrointestinal malignancies at diagnosis- Results from the Cancer & Aging Resilience Evaluation (CARE) study.

Authors:  Nabiel Mir; Paul MacLennan; Mustafa Al-Obaidi; Donna Murdaugh; Kelly M Kenzik; Andrew McDonald; Noha Sharafeldin; Crystal Young-Smith; Ravi Paluri; Olumide Gbolahan; Lakshmin Nandagopal; Smita Bhatia; Grant R Williams
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 3.599

8.  Trajectories of Cognitive Function Prior to Cancer Diagnosis: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Kimberly D van der Willik; Michael Hauptmann; Katarzyna Jóźwiak; Elisabeth J Vinke; Rikje Ruiter; Bruno H Stricker; Annette Compter; M Arfan Ikram; Sanne B Schagen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Prevalence of neurocognitive and perceived speech deficits in patients with head and neck cancer before treatment: Associations with demographic, behavioral, and disease-related factors.

Authors:  Vitória Piai; Femke Jansen; Kristoffer Dahlslätt; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Judith Prins; René Leemans; Chris H J Terhaard; Johannes A Langendijk; Robert J Baatenburg de Jong; Johannes H Smit; Robert Takes; Roy P C Kessels
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Reliability and Validity of the Spanish-Language Version of the NIH Toolbox.

Authors:  Rina S Fox; Jennifer J Manly; Jerry Slotkin; John Devin Peipert; Richard C Gershon
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2020-04-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.