Literature DB >> 28415699

The prognostic value of histological subtype in patients with metastatic bladder cancer.

Cheng Chen1, Linkun Hu1, Ye Chen1, Jianquan Hou1.   

Abstract

We aim to evaluate the prognostic effect of the histological sub-type in patients with metastatic bladder cancer based on the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database. A total of 2634 eligible patients were included. The histological subtypes were: transitional cell carcinoma (TCC; 75.2%); adenocarcinoma (3.3%); squamous cell carcinoma (SQCC; 4.1%); and small cell carcinoma (4.3%). A significant association of adenocarcinoma with better survival outcomes (P < 0.015), and that of SQCC with worse outcomes (P < 0.001) was observed. On multivariate analysis, adenocarcinoma was significantly associated with longer and SQCC with shorter survival time as compared to TCC. Overall, 1331 (50.5%) patients had a single metastatic site and 523 (19.9%) had multiple sites involved. Single-site metastasis had a better survival outcome than multiple metastases (P < 0.001). Histological sub-type and presence of multiple metastatic sites are independent predictors of survival time. Prospective, in-depth research is needed to determine optimal therapeutic strategies for different histological subtypes of bladder cancer with different metastatic patterns.

Entities:  

Keywords:  distant metastasis; histology; prognosis; survival; urinary bladder neoplasms

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28415699      PMCID: PMC5438659          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.16083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


INTRODUCTION

Bladder cancer (BC) has the fifth highest incidence among all cancers in the United States; an estimated 76960 new cases of BC and 16390 deaths from BC occurred in 2016 [1]. It is also the 9th most common cancer and the 13th most common cause of death worldwide [2]. Urothelial carcinoma (transitional cell carcinoma, TCC) is the most common histological sub-type of primary BC, which accounts for > 90% of all bladder tumors. Other histological subtypes include squamous cell carcinoma (SQCC), adenocarcinoma (AD), small cell carcinoma (SCC) and some other rare non-epithelial subtypes. Among these, SQCC, AD and SCC account for less than 5%, 2% [3] and 1% [4, 5] of all primary bladder tumors, respectively. The rare occurrence of non-TCC subtypes precludes large, prospective studies to compare outcomes. Retrospective and cohort analyses remain the primary tools for clinical research. Previous studies of the impact of non-TCC histology on survival have yielded inconsistent results [6-9]. Some have reported no difference in survival between SQCC and TCC [7-9]. However, a multi-institutional retrospective study to assess the impact of non-TCC histology on bladder cancer-specific outcomes in patients treated with radical cystectomy [6] suggested that non-TCC histology portends worse clinical outcomes. This may reflect a greater propensity for locally aggressive disease and distant metastasis, as well as differential response to chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Approximately 25% of all TCC patients will have muscle-invasive and metastatic disease. The prevalence of bone metastasis was reported to be 30–40% in patients with metastatic TCC [10] and the presence of distant (lung, liver, bone) metastases were reported to correlate with shortened survival [11-17]. However, the effect of other histological subtypes on clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic BC remains unclear. Thus, we evaluated TCC and three other rare BC histological sub-types in a contemporary, population-based cohort with an emphasis on the metastatic frequency of BC histology and their effect on overall- and cancer-specific survival.

RESULTS

Data pertaining to 2634 patients who had stage M1 BC, and information on specific metastatic site in the period between January 2010 and December 2013, were extracted. The baseline demographic and clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Of all patients with metastatic BC, the histological subtypes included TCC (n = 1981 [75.2%]), AD (n = 88 [3.3%]), SQCC (n = 107 [4.1%]) and SCC (n = 114 [4.3%]). A total of 1331 (50.5%) patients had a single metastatic site (bone, brain, liver or lung), while 523 (19.9%) had metastatic lesions at more than one site. In single metastatic BC patients, 575 (43.2%) of them had bone metastasis, 24 (1.8%) with brain metastasis, 280 (21%) with liver metastasis and 452 (34%) with lung metastasis.
Table 1

Clinical features associated with various histological subtypes of bladder cancer patients

VariablesOverall PatientsTransitional cell carcinomaAdenocarcinomaSquamous cell carcinomaSmall cell carcinomaP value
No. of Patients2634
Age (n(%))< 0.001
 ≤ 65836 (31.7%)615 (31%)47 (53.4%)40 (37.4%)31 (27.2%)
 > 651798 (68.3%)1366 (69%)41 (46.6%)67 (62.6%)83 (72.8%)
Gender (n(%))< 0.001
 male1853 (70.3%)1418 (71.6%)58 (65.9%)52 (48.6%)94 (82.5%)
 female781 (29.7%)563 (28.4%)30 (34.1%)55 (51.4%)20 (17.5%)
Race (n(%))0.003
 White2227 (84.5%)1692 (85.5%)65 (73.9%)85 (79.4%)105 (92.1%)
 Black262 (9.9%)185 (9.4%)18 (20.5%)15 (14%)7 (6.1%)
 Other142 (5.4%)101 (5.1%)5 (5.7%)7 (6.5%)2 (1.8%)
 Unknown3 (0.1%)
Marital status (n(%))0.001
 Single426 (16.2%)307 (16.2%)27 (30.7%)22 (21.8%)8 (7.2%)
 Married1262 (47.9%)963 (51%)42 (47.7%)50 (49.5%)71 (64%)
 Divorced/Separated338 (12.8%)260 (13.8%)7 (8%)9 (8.9%)15 (13.5%)
 Widowed491 (18.6%)360 (19%)12 (13.6%)20 (19.8%)17 (15.3%)
 Unknown117 (4.4%)
T stage (n(%))< 0.001
 T0 + Tx585 (22.2%)322 (16.3%)28 (31.8%)21 (19.6%)22 (19.3%)
 T1385 (14.6%)316 (16%)10 (11.4%)11 (10.3%)17 (14.9%)
 T2948 (36%)813 (41%)17 (19.3%)25 (23.4%)44 (38.6%)
 T3227 (8.6%)177 (8.9%)13 (14.8%)7 (6.5%)10 (8.8%)
 T4489 (18.6%)353 (17.8%)20 (22.7%)43 (40.2%)21 (18.4%)
N stage (n(%))0.008
 N0 + Nx1815 (68.9%)1335 (67.4%)71 (80.7%)64 (59.8%)70 (61.4%)
 N1245 (9.3%)189 (9.5%)6 (6.8%)18 (16.8%)11 (9.6%)
 N2439 (16.7%)344 (17.4%)11 (12.5%)17 (15.9%)29 (25.4%)
 N3135 (5.1%)113 (5.7%)0 (0%)8 (7.5%)4 (3.5%)
Grade (n(%))< 0.001
 G121 (0.8%)12 (0.8%)1 (2%)7 (9.2%)0 (0%)
 G280 (3%)49 (3.1%)9 (18.4%)20 (26.3%)0 (0%)
 G3657 (24.9%)481 (30.3%)36 (73.5%)37 (48.7%)31 (50.8%)
 G41126 (42.7%)1045 (65.8%)3 (6.1%)12 (15.8%)30 (49.2%)
 Unknown750 (28.5%)
Surgery (n(%))< 0.001
 No845 (32.1%)484 (24.5%)41 (46.6%)42 (39.3%)27 (23.7%)
 Yes1784 (67.7%)1494 (75.5%)47 (53.4%)65 (60.7%)87 (76.3%)
 Unknown5 (0.2%)3 (0.2%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
Radiotherapy (n(%))0.414
 No2055 (78%)1521 (77.5%)72 (81.8%)87 (82.9%)86 (75.4%)
 Yes553 (21%)442 (22.5%)16 (18.2%)18 (17.1%)28 (24.6%)
 Unknown26 (1%)
Distant metastasis (n(%))0.031
 Single site (n(%))1331 (50.5%)1014 (51.2%)41 (46.6%)44 (41.1%)54 (47.4%)
 Only bone575 (43.2%)468 (46.2%)17 (43.6%)15 (34.1%)22 (40.7%)0.358
 Only brain24 (1.8%)20 (2%)0 (0%)0 (0%)1 (1.9%)0.635
 Only liver280 (21%)179 (17.7%)10 (24.4%)5 (11.4%)29 (53.7%)< 0.001
 Only lung452 (34%)347 (34.2%)14 (34.1%)24 (54.5%)2 (3.7%)< 0.001
 Multiple sites523 (19.9%)377 (27.1%)15 (26.8%)15 (25.4%)38 (41.3%)
 Unknown780 (29.6%)
Histology (n(%))
 Transitional cell carcinoma1981 (75.2%)
 Adenocarcinoma88 (3.3%)
 Squamous cell carcinoma107 (4.1%)
 Small cell carcinoma114 (4.3%)
 Other462 (17.5%)
Median duration of follow-up was 5 months (range, 0 to 47). A total of 2134 (81%) patients died in the group. Kaplan-Meier curves and median OS and CSS were calculated. The median OS and CSS for TCC were 5 and 10 months (range, 0 to 47), respectively; 6 and 25 months (range, 0–47) for AD, 3 and 5 months (range, 0–27) for SQCC and 7 and 11 months (range, 0–43) for SCC, respectively. As shown in Figure 1, the median OS and CSS for AD was significantly higher than that for other histological types (P < 0.015). The median OS and CSS for SQCC were significantly lower than that for the other histological types (P < 0.001). However, no significant difference in median OS and CSS was observed between TCC and SCC (P = 0.877 and 0.686, respectively).
Figure 1

Overall survival (A) and bladder cancer-specific survival (B) in bladder cancer patients with transitional cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, small cell carcinoma with distant metastasis.

Overall survival (A) and bladder cancer-specific survival (B) in bladder cancer patients with transitional cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, small cell carcinoma with distant metastasis. The median OS and CSS in patients with a single metastatic site was 5 and 9 months (range, 0–47), respectively, while that in patients with more than one metastatic site was 3 and 6 months (range, 0–43), respectively. As shown in Figure 2, the median OS and CSS of patients with multiple metastatic sites was significantly lower than that of patients with a single metastatic site (P < 0.001). Among patients with a single metastatic lesion, the frequency of bone and brain metastasis was almost the same. Lung was the most common site of metastasis in patients with SQCC (54.5%), while it was the least common metastatic site (3.7%) in those with SCC. Liver was the most frequent metastatic site in patients with SCC (53.7%). No brain metastasis was found in patients with AD and SQCC. As shown in Figure 3, a significant difference with respect to liver and lung metastasis was observed between SCC and other histological types (P ≤ 0.004), while a significant difference in lung metastasis was observed between SQCC with TCC and SCC (P < 0.006).
Figure 2

Overall survival (A) and bladder cancer-specific survival (B) in bladder cancer patients with single metastatic site vs. multiple metastatic sites.

Figure 3

Metastatic frequency in patients with single-site metastatic bladder cancer by histological subtype

Overall survival (A) and bladder cancer-specific survival (B) in bladder cancer patients with single metastatic site vs. multiple metastatic sites. On univariate analysis (Table 2), thirteen variables showed a significant association with OS; these included age (> 65 years old), being widowed, pathological T (T1, T2, T3, T4) and N (N1, N2, N3) stages, history of surgery, presence of multiple metastatic sites, and AD and SQCC histological subtypes. Five variables showed a significant association with CSS (married status, history of surgery, presence of multiple metastatic sites, AD and SQCC histological subtypes). Four variables showed a significant association with both OS and CSS (history of surgery, presence of multiple metastatic sites, AD and SQCC histological subtypes). About 67.7% of all patients had undergone a surgical procedure, which included transurethral resection and partial, simple or radical cystectomy. As 2440 patients (92.6%) with metastatic sites were diagnosed at autopsy, only 78 (3%) patients had undergone surgery at the site of distant metastases. Significantly decreased hazard for OS and CSS was observed in patients who underwent surgery as compared to that in patients who did not undergo surgery (Hazard ratio [HR]: 0.660, 0.829, respectively). Presence of multiple metastatic sites was associated with lower OS and CSS (HR: 1.423, 1.537, respectively) than that associated with single site metastasis. Specifically, AD was associated with longer OS and CSS (HR: 0.697, 0.567, respectively) than that associated with the referent TCC. In contrast, SQCC was associated with shorter OS and CSS (HR: 1.504, 1.739, respectively) as compared to TCC.
Table 2

Univariate analysis of overall survival and bladder cancer-specific survival in patients with metastatic bladder cancer

VariablesOverall survivalBladder cancer-specific survival
Hazard Ratio95% CIP valueHazard Ratio95% CIP value
Age
 ≤ 651.000 (reference)1.000 (reference)
 > 651.3391.220 to 1.469< 0.0011.0380.922 to 1.1680.540
Gender
 male1.000(reference)1.000 (reference)
 female0.9170.836 to 1.0060.0660.9090.804 to 1.0270.127
Race
 White1.000 (reference)1.000 (reference)
 Black1.0760.935 to 1.2400.3070.9950.820 to 1.2070.960
 Other0.9360.767 to 1.1420.5140.8640.657 to 1.1350.294
Marital status
 Single1.000 (reference)1.000 (reference)
 Married0.8850.783 to 1.0010.0520.7960.680 to 0.9330.005
 Divorced/Separated0.9900.845 to 1.1600.9050.9310.759 to 1.1420.491
 Widowed1.1661.010 to 1.3450.0360.9670.799 to 1.1690.727
T stage
 T0 + Tx1.000 (reference)1.000 (reference)
 T10.7580.657 to 0.875< 0.0010.9600.787 to 1.1720.690
 T20.7220.644 to 0.810< 0.0010.9850.839 to 1.1570.855
 T30.6670.562 to 0.790< 0.0010.9380.750 to 1.1740.578
 T40.8470.743 to 0.9670.0141.0430.866 to 1.2560.656
N stage
 N0 + Nx1.000 (reference)1.000 (reference)
 N10.8010.685 to 0.9370.0050.9130.747 to 1.1150.371
 N20.8530.759 to 0.9590.0080.9580.824 to 1.1140.579
 N30.7530.617 to 0.9190.0050.8690.675 to 1.1190.277
Grade
 G11.000 (reference)1.000 (reference)
 G21.0190.595 to 1.7450.9450.9440.443 to 2.0110.880
 G31.2460.769 to 2.0190.3721.0330.515 to 2.0720.928
 G41.0880.673 to 1.7580.7310.8750.435 to 1.7580.708
Surgery
 No1.000 (reference)1.000 (reference)
 Yes0.6600.603 to 0.722< 0.0010.8290.732 to 0.9390.003
Radiotherapy
 No1.000 (reference)1.000 (reference)
 Yes0.9180.827 to 1.0180.1050.9190.801 to 1.0550.233
Distant metastasis
 Single site1.000 (reference)1.000 (reference)
 Multiple sites1.4231.275 to 1.588< 0.0011.5371.331 to 1.774< 0.001
Histology
 Transitional cell carcinoma1.000 (reference)1.000 (reference)
 Adenocarcinoma0.6970.540 to 0.8890.0050.5670.391 to 0.8210.003
 Squamous cell carcinoma1.5041.216 to 1.862< 0.0011.7391.335 to 2.265< 0.001
 Small cell carcinoma0.9850.800 to 1.2130.8880.9460.715 to 1.2510.696
Variables significantly associated with survival in univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis (Table 3). The effect of presence of multiple metastatic sites was further increased after accounting for other covariates (HRs for OS and CSS: 1.428 and 1.605, respectively, versus presence of single metastatic site). Compared with TCC, a lower hazard for OS and CSS was identified in patients with AD (HR: 0.593, 0.599, respectively), while a higher hazard of mortality was found in those with SQCC (HR: 1.496, 1.733 respectively). Other variables significantly associated with OS on multivariate analysis included age (> 65 years old) and history of surgery. Age > 65 years was associated with shorter OS (HR: 1.273 vs. age < 65 years). Patients who had a history of surgery tended to have longer OS (HR: 0.729 vs. those with no history of surgery).
Table 3

Multivariate analysis of overall survival and bladder cancer-specific survival in patients with metastatic bladder cancer

VariablesOverall survivalBladder cancer-specific survival
Hazard Ratio95% CIP valueHazard Ratio95% CIP value
Age
 ≤ 651.000 (reference)
 > 651.2731.116 to 1.452< 0.001
Marital status
 Single1.000 (reference)1.000 (reference)
 Married0.8750.744 to 1.0290.1070.8830.723 to 1.0790.223
 Divorced/Separated1.0270.836 to 1.2620.7991.0440.806 to 1.3520.744
 Widowed1.0000.820 to 1.2190.9990.9890.775 to 1.2620.928
T stage
 T0 + Tx1.000 (reference)
 T10.9840.802 to 1.2070.875
 T21.0000.829 to 1.2061.000
 T30.9440.731 to 1.2180.657
 T41.0280.838 to 1.2620.788
N stage
 N0 + Nx1.000 (reference)
 N10.8770.712 to 1.0800.215
 N20.9420.800 to 1.1090.475
 N31.1480.857 to1.5370.355
Surgery
 No1.000 (reference)1.000 (reference)
 Yes0.7290.630 to 0.845< 0.0010.9750.817 to 1.1650.781
Distant metastasis
 Single site1.000 (reference)1.000 (reference)
 Multiple sites1.4281.260 to 1.618< 0.0011.6051.367 to 1.885< 0.001
Histology
 Transitional cell carcinoma1.000 (reference)1.000 (reference)
 Adenocarcinoma0.5930.427 to 0.8250.0020.5990.389 to 0.9220.020
 Squamous cell carcinoma1.4961.121 to 1.9950.0061.7331.225 to 2.4520.002
 Small cell carcinoma0.8600.678 to 1.0910.2130.7820.568 to 1.0780.134

DISCUSSION

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the SEER database to investigate the effect of histological sub-type on survival in patients with metastatic BC. Our study revealed several important findings. First, although the association between histological subtype and prognosis of BC has been investigated before, previous population-based studies were limited only to one rare histological subtype of BC such as SQCC [7-9], AD [18, 19] or SCC [4, 5, 20–24], or had relatively small sample sizes [6]. SQCC histology was reported to be an independent predictor of higher all-cause and bladder cancer-specific mortality as compared to TCC among patients with advanced stages (AJCC stage III/IV) [7]. However, some studies found no difference in CSS associated with SQCC and TCC [6, 8, 9, 25]. A large cohort study showed that patients with primary AD were not associated with worse prognosis than patients with TCC [26]. We found that AD patients had better survival outcomes than those with conventional TCC, while SQCC had worse outcomes than TCC. Further, there were no significant differences in OS and CSS between TCC and SCC patients in stage M1 group, which is in accordance with results of a previous study [27]. Secondly; we discovered a difference in metastatic tendency between the SQCC and SCC subtypes of BC. We found that SQCC metastasizes predominantly to lung (54.5%), while SCC metastasizes predominantly to liver (53.7%) and is least likely to metastasize to lung (3.7%) when compared with other histological subtypes of BC. These results are in line with studies conducted at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center [28] and Mayo Clinic [29]. Although brain metastases are a frequent complication in patients with SCC of the lung, they do not appear to be a common metastatic site in patients with SCC of the bladder [20, 22, 30]. We also found only one patient (1.9%) who developed brain metastases. Due to the low incidence of brain metastases in SCC of the bladder, prophylactic cranial irradiation is not routinely recommended. In cases of metastatic BC, transurethral resection, cystectomy combined with systemic chemotherapy has been proposed apart from partial cystectomy, and radiotherapy [22]. However, there is a paucity of robust data to inform appropriate tailored therapies for different histological subtypes of metastatic BC. Limitations of our study include the retrospective design and its associated bias, such as selection bias for different treatment schedules. Moreover, due to the inherent limitations of the SEER database, data on specific metastatic sites prior to year 2010 were not available; therefore, the reference period for this study was 2010–2013. We also have no access to data on performance status and chemotherapy which are also important prognostic factors for patients with metastatic BC. So the use of claims based data for this approach will lead to somewhat insufficient estimations. Despite the above limitations, our study fills a gap with respect to histological subtypes and metastatic sites of BC. In conclusion, based on the SEER database, we compared survival outcomes by histological subtype and site of metastatic lesions in patients with bladder cancer. Our findings suggest that squamous cell carcinoma and presence of multiple metastases portend a poorer prognosis in bladder cancer patients with distant metastasis. Obvious associations are reported with respect to metastatic frequency among patients with squamous and small cell carcinoma. Considering the poor prognosis of metastatic bladder cancer, we should keep an eye on those susceptible organs and sites once the histological subtype is determined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design and population

We identified all patients from 2010–2013 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database with BC diagnosed as stage M1, according to the AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) 7th edition. The permission to access the research data was obtained vide reference number 10263-Nov2015. This study was approved by the Clinical investigation ethics committee of the Soochow University (No. 2015103). We used International Classification of Disease for Oncology, Third Edition (ICD-O-3) to determine the histological sub-type. The codes selected were: transitional cell carcinoma (8120, 8122, 8130 and 8131); adenocarcinoma (8140, 8574, 8260 and 8255); squamous cell carcinoma (8052, 8070, 8071 and 8083); and small cell carcinoma (8041 and 8045).

Outcomes

Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time period from the first diagnosis of bladder cancer to the date of all-cause death, while bladder cancer-specific survival (CSS) was determined until cancer-specific death or censoring, with the end of follow-up occurring on December 31, 2013.

Covariates

Demographic characteristics included age (< 65 and > 65 years old), gender (male and female), race (white, black and others), and marital status (single, married, divorced/separated and widowed). Clinical characteristics included pathological T and N stages, tumor grade (1-well differentiated, 2-moderately differentiated, 3-poorly differentiated and 4-undifferentiated), surgery, radiotherapy, distant metastasis (single site and multiple sites) as well as tumor histology (TCC, AD, SQCC and SCC).

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables of Table 1 and metastatic rates of Figure 3 are presented as percentages and analyzed by Chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test. In Figure 1 and Figure 2, the Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survivor functions and differences in OS, CSS probabilities were estimated using the log rank statistic. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess association of variables with survival. Variables showing a significant association with survival on univariate analysis were included in the multivariate model. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 21 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA); two-sided value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. The bar and pie charts were drawn using GraphPad Prism version 6.01 (San Diego, CA).
  30 in total

1.  Treatment trends and outcomes of small-cell carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Eugene J Koay; Bin S Teh; Arnold C Paulino; E Brian Butler
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Long-term survival in metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma and prognostic factors predicting outcome of therapy.

Authors:  D F Bajorin; P M Dodd; M Mazumdar; M Fazzari; J A McCaffrey; H I Scher; H Herr; G Higgins; M G Boyle
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Small cell carcinoma of the bladder: a contemporary clinicopathological study of 51 cases.

Authors:  N A Abrahams; C Moran; A O Reyes; A Siefker-Radtke; A G Ayala
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.087

4.  Adenocarcinoma versus urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder: comparison between pathologic stage at radical cystectomy and cancer-specific mortality.

Authors:  Giovanni Lughezzani; Maxine Sun; Claudio Jeldres; Ahmed Alasker; Lars Budäus; Shahrokh F Shariat; Mathieu Latour; Hugues Widmer; Alain Duclos; Martine Jolivet-Tremblay; Francesco Montorsi; Paul Perrotte; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Prognostic factors in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract experiencing treatment failure with platinum-containing regimens.

Authors:  Joaquim Bellmunt; Toni K Choueiri; Ronan Fougeray; Fabio A B Schutz; Yacine Salhi; Eric Winquist; Stéphane Culine; Hans von der Maase; David J Vaughn; Jonathan E Rosenberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Small cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder: a 15-year retrospective review of treatment and survival in the Anglian Cancer Network.

Authors:  Mukesh Mukesh; Natalie Cook; Abigail E Hollingdale; Nicola L Ainsworth; Simon G Russell
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 7.  Bladder cancer: clinical and pathological profile.

Authors:  Antonio Lopez-Beltran
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl       Date:  2008-09

8.  Locoregional small cell carcinoma of the bladder: clinical characteristics and treatment patterns.

Authors:  Sanjay G Patel; C J Stimson; Harras B Zaid; Matthew J Resnick; Michael S Cookson; Daniel A Barocas; Sam S Chang
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Urothelial carcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma of bladder: is survival different with stage adjustment?

Authors:  Emil Scosyrev; Jorge Yao; Edward Messing
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  A population-based study of incidence and patient survival of small cell carcinoma in the United States, 1992-2010.

Authors:  Graça M Dores; Osama Qubaiah; Ankur Mody; Bassam Ghabach; Susan S Devesa
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  11 in total

1.  Canadian Urological Association guideline: Muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Girish S Kulkarni; Peter C Black; Srikala S Sridhar; Anil Kapoor; Alexandre R Zlotta; Bobby Shayegan; Ricardo A Rendon; Peter Chung; Theodorus van der Kwast; Nimira Alimohamed; Yves Fradet; Wassim Kassouf
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Gender dimorphism in survival of patients with lymph node metastasis of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Yadong Guo; Zongtai Zheng; Wentao Zhang; Shiyu Mao; Fuhan Yang; Wei Li; Yang Yan; Xudong Yao
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 5.485

3.  The prognostic effect of metastasis patterns on overall survival in patients with distant metastatic bladder cancer: a SEER population-based analysis.

Authors:  Jiafeng Shou; Qi Zhang; Dahong Zhang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Prognostic value of site-specific metastases and therapeutic roles of surgery for patients with metastatic bladder cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Fan Dong; Yifan Shen; Fengbin Gao; Tianyuan Xu; Xianjin Wang; Xiaohua Zhang; Shan Zhong; Minguang Zhang; Shanwen Chen; Zhoujun Shen
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  Racial differences in Urinary Bladder Cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Qian Chang; Yang Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Autophagy modulation in bladder cancer development and treatment (Review).

Authors:  Faping Li; Hui Guo; Yuxuan Yang; Mingliang Feng; Bin Liu; Xiang Ren; Honglan Zhou
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  Prognostic nomogram for bladder cancer with brain metastases: a National Cancer Database analysis.

Authors:  Zhixian Yao; Zhong Zheng; Wu Ke; Renjie Wang; Xingyu Mu; Feng Sun; Xiang Wang; Shivank Garg; Wenyin Shi; Yinyan He; Zhihong Liu
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 5.531

8.  Prognostic value of site-specific metastases for patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A SEER database analysis.

Authors:  Rui Cheng; Qiang Du; Jingmin Ye; Bi Wang; Yanling Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 9.  Bladder cancer stem cells: clonal origin and therapeutic perspectives.

Authors:  Yi Li; Kaisu Lin; Zhao Yang; Ning Han; Xiaofang Quan; Xiangyang Guo; Chong Li
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-08

10.  Does Health Insurance Modify the Association Between Race and Cancer-Specific Survival in Patients with Urinary Bladder Malignancy in the U.S.?

Authors:  Juliana Morales; Aaron Malles; Marrell Kimble; Pura Rodriguez de la Vega; Grettel Castro; Alan M Nieder; Noël C Barengo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.