Literature DB >> 1607913

A randomized comparison of cisplatin alone or in combination with methotrexate, vinblastine, and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a cooperative group study.

P J Loehrer1, L H Einhorn, P J Elson, E D Crawford, P Kuebler, I Tannock, D Raghavan, R Stuart-Harris, M F Sarosdy, B A Lowe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A prospective randomized trial was performed to determine if the addition of methotrexate, vinblastine, and doxorubicin to cisplatin (M-VAC) imparted a response rate or a survival advantage over single-agent cisplatin in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 1984 through May 1989, 269 patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma were entered onto this international intergroup trial and randomized to receive intravenous (IV) cisplatin (70 mg/m2) alone or with methotrexate (30 mg/m2 on days 1, 15, 22), vinblastine (3 mg/m2 on days 2, 15, 22) plus doxorubicin (30 mg/m2 on day 2). Cycles were repeated every 28 days until tumor progression or a maximum of six cycles. There were 246 fully assessable patients of whom 126 were randomized to cisplatin alone and 120 were randomized to the M-VAC regimen.
RESULTS: As expected, the M-VAC regimen was associated with a greater toxicity, especially leukopenia, mucositis, granulocytopenic fever, and drug-related mortality. Response rates were superior for the M-VAC regimen compared with single-agent cisplatin (39% v 12%; P less than .0001). Similarly, the progression-free survival (10.0 v 4.3 months) and overall survival (12.5 v 8.2 months) were significantly greater for the combined therapy arm.
CONCLUSION: Although a more toxic regimen, we found M-VAC to be superior to single-agent cisplatin with respect to response rate, duration of remission, and overall survival in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1607913     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.7.1066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  174 in total

Review 1.  New approaches to treatment of metastatic bladder cancer.

Authors:  M J Edelman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: new approaches to the treatment of advanced disease.

Authors:  D P Petrylak
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Phase II trial of oral piritrexim in advanced, previously treated transitional cell cancer of bladder.

Authors:  M Khorsand; J Lange; L Feun; N J Clendeninn; M Collier; G Wilding
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 4.  Comparing how significantly the pharmacological treatment of genitourinary cancer in a non-curative setting affects endpoints of survival or response.

Authors:  David R Yates; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1 expression in resectable, muscle-invasive urothelial cancer correlates with survival in younger patients.

Authors:  Lauren C Harshman; Gerold Bepler; Zhong Zheng; John P Higgins; Genevera I Allen; Sandy Srinivas
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Renal medullary carcinoma: a nearly fatal malignancy specifically affecting patients with a so-called benign condition.

Authors:  Yamila Goenaga-Vázquez; Gloria Colón; Nilka Barrios; María Correa
Journal:  CEN Case Rep       Date:  2018-02-02

7.  Phase II study to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of the mitotic spindle kinesin inhibitor AZD4877 in patients with recurrent advanced urothelial cancer.

Authors:  Robert Jones; Jacqueline Vuky; Tony Elliott; Graham Mead; José Angel Arranz; John Chester; Simon Chowdhury; Arkadiusz Z Dudek; Volker Müller-Mattheis; Marc-Oliver Grimm; Jürgen E Gschwend; Christian Wülfing; Peter Albers; Jianguo Li; Anna Osmukhina; Jeffrey Skolnik; Gary Hudes
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.850

8.  [Gemcitabine/cisplatin vs. MVAC. 5 year survival outcome of the phase III study of chemotherapy of advanced urothelial carcinoma in Germany].

Authors:  J Lehmann; M Retz; G Steiner; P Albers; E Jaeger; A Knuth; C Lippert; M Koser; K Stockamp; C Otto; H Melchior; C Fassmann; C Potratz; T Loch; H G Derigs; T Becker; T Kälble; H-J Piechota; L Hertle; S Weinknecht; L Weissbach; M Al-Mwalad; A Hamza; H Henss; D Brkovic; S Pomer; J Roloff; P Walz; R Muschter; U Tunn; E Winter; P Bub; U Kaldenbach; S Roth; A Brauers; G Jakse; A E Richter; M Wirth; J Hartlapp; H Van Ahlen; M Stöckle
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-04-02       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Feasiblity study of gemcitabine and cisplatin administered every two weeks in patients with advanced urothelial tumors and impaired renal function.

Authors:  Joan Carles; Cristina Suárez; Carlos Mesía; Miquel Nogué; Albert Font; Montserrat Doménech; Marta Suárez; Ignasi Tusquets; M Gallén; Joan Albanell; Xavier Fabregat
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 10.  Gemcitabine and radiotherapy in the treatment of brain metastases from transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a case report.

Authors:  Chris Protzel; Uwe Zimmermann; Elke Asse; Gerhard Kallwellis; Klaus Juergen Klebingat
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.