Literature DB >> 10506615

Long-term survival in metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma and prognostic factors predicting outcome of therapy.

D F Bajorin1, P M Dodd, M Mazumdar, M Fazzari, J A McCaffrey, H I Scher, H Herr, G Higgins, M G Boyle.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The variation in reported survival of patients with metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC) treated with systemic chemotherapy may be a consequence of pretreatment patient characteristics. We hypothesized that a prognostic factor-based model of survival among patients treated with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin chemotherapy could account for such differences and help guide clinical trial design and interpretation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A database of 203 patients with unresectable or metastatic TCC was retrospectively subjected to a multivariate regression analysis to determine which patient characteristics had independent prognostic significance for survival. Patients were assigned to three risk categories depending on the number of unfavorable characteristics. Patient selection in phase II studies was addressed by developing a table of expected median survival for patient cohorts that had varying proportions of patients from the three risk categories.
RESULTS: Two factors had independent prognosis: Karnofsky performance status (KPS) less than 80% and visceral (lung, liver, or bone) metastasis. Median survival times for patients who had zero, one, or two risk factors were 33, 13.4, and 9.3 months, respectively (P =.0001). The median survival time of patient cohorts could vary from 9 to 26 months simply by altering the proportion of patients from different risk categories.
CONCLUSION: The presence of baseline KPS less than 80% or visceral metastasis has an impact on survival. Reporting the proportion of patients with zero, one, and two risk factors will facilitate understanding of the relevance of the median survival in phase II trials. Phase III trials should stratify patients according to the number of risk factors to avoid imbalance in treatment arms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10506615     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.10.3173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  155 in total

Review 1.  New approaches to treatment of metastatic bladder cancer.

Authors:  M J Edelman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Randomized phase II/III trial assessing gemcitabine/carboplatin and methotrexate/carboplatin/vinblastine in patients with advanced urothelial cancer who are unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy: EORTC study 30986.

Authors:  Maria De Santis; Joaquim Bellmunt; Graham Mead; J Martijn Kerst; Michael Leahy; Pablo Maroto; Thierry Gil; Sandrine Marreaud; Gedske Daugaard; Iwona Skoneczna; Sandra Collette; Julie Lorent; Ronald de Wit; Richard Sylvester
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  [Chemotherapy of bladder cancer. Systemic therapy with reduced toxicity].

Authors:  J E Gschwend; J Simon; B Volkmer; R E Hautmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Current management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  G Sancho; P Maroto; J Palou
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1 expression in resectable, muscle-invasive urothelial cancer correlates with survival in younger patients.

Authors:  Lauren C Harshman; Gerold Bepler; Zhong Zheng; John P Higgins; Genevera I Allen; Sandy Srinivas
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  The small conductance calcium-activated potassium channel 3 (SK3) is a molecular target for Edelfosine to reduce the invasive potential of urothelial carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Konrad Steinestel; Stefan Eder; Konstantin Ehinger; Juliane Schneider; Felicitas Genze; Eva Winkler; Eva Wardelmann; Andres J Schrader; Julie Steinestel
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-11-30

7.  1,1-Bis(3'-indolyl)-1-(p-chlorophenyl)methane activates the orphan nuclear receptor Nurr1 and inhibits bladder cancer growth.

Authors:  Teruo Inamoto; Sabitha Papineni; Sudhakar Chintharlapalli; Sung-Dae Cho; Stephen Safe; Ashish M Kamat
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.261

8.  [Gemcitabine/cisplatin vs. MVAC. 5 year survival outcome of the phase III study of chemotherapy of advanced urothelial carcinoma in Germany].

Authors:  J Lehmann; M Retz; G Steiner; P Albers; E Jaeger; A Knuth; C Lippert; M Koser; K Stockamp; C Otto; H Melchior; C Fassmann; C Potratz; T Loch; H G Derigs; T Becker; T Kälble; H-J Piechota; L Hertle; S Weinknecht; L Weissbach; M Al-Mwalad; A Hamza; H Henss; D Brkovic; S Pomer; J Roloff; P Walz; R Muschter; U Tunn; E Winter; P Bub; U Kaldenbach; S Roth; A Brauers; G Jakse; A E Richter; M Wirth; J Hartlapp; H Van Ahlen; M Stöckle
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-04-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  Recent advances in medical therapy for metastatic urothelial cancer.

Authors:  Takeshi Yuasa; Shinji Urakami; Junji Yonese
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Phase 2 trial of pemetrexed disodium and gemcitabine in advanced urothelial cancer (E4802): a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  Robert Dreicer; Hailun Li; Matthew M Cooney; George Wilding; Bruce J Roth
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.