| Literature DB >> 28413749 |
Thomas Fischer1, Rainer Riedl1.
Abstract
The incorporation of fluorine atoms into functional molecules is of wide interest in synthetic organic chemistry as well as cognate disciplines. In particular, in medicinal chemistry, there is a strong desire to positively influence the physicochemical molecular properties of drug compounds by introducing fluorine into biologically active molecules. Here, we present targeted fluoro positioning as the key design principle of converting a weak matrix metalloproteinase-13 (MMP-13) inhibitor into a very potent (IC50=6 nm) and highly selective (selectivity factors of >1000 over MMP-1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14) inhibitor with excellent plasma and microsomal stability, and no binding to the hERG channel (hERG: human ether-a-go-go related gene).Entities:
Keywords: drug design; drug discovery; medicinal chemistry; metalloenzymes; structure–activity relationships
Year: 2017 PMID: 28413749 PMCID: PMC5390795 DOI: 10.1002/open.201600158
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ChemistryOpen ISSN: 2191-1363 Impact factor: 2.911
Figure 1Previously identified weak MMP‐13 inhibitor 1 displaying poor stability in plasma and liver microsomes.
Figure 2Molecular modeling of inhibitor 1 and its elongated derivatives in PDB 2OW9:25 pharmacophore displayed in cyan spheres; different lengths of methylene linkers depicted in blue [CH2], yellow [(CH2)2], cyan [(CH2)3], green [(CH2)4], magenta [(CH2)5].
Figure 3Targeted fluoro positioning to probe water‐mediated interactions.
Figure 4Synthesized fluoro probes 2 d–f for the targeted inhibition of MMP‐13 and non‐fluorinated compounds 2 a–c and 2 g.
MMP‐13 inhibitory data for compounds 1 and 2 a–g.
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inhibitor | R1 | R2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| H | H | 9800±3400 | 3.94 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
|
| H | O(CH2)2COOH | 2244±200 | 3.21 | 0.23 | 2.44 |
|
| H | O(CH2)3COOH | 556±125 | 3.56 | 0.25 | 2.69 |
|
| H | O(CH2)4COOH | 35±0.6 | 4.00 | 0.29 | 3.46 |
|
| 4‐F | O(CH2)4COOH | 6±2.5 | 4.15 | 0.31 | 4.07 |
|
| 3‐F | O(CH2)4COOH | 10±1.6 | 4.15 | 0.30 | 3.85 |
|
| 2‐F | O(CH2)4COOH | 134±39 | 4.15 | 0.26 | 2.72 |
|
| H | O(CH2)5COOH | 151±31 | 4.45 | 0.26 | 2.37 |
[a] The ligand efficiency (LE) was calculated as 1.4(−logIC 50)/N, where N equals the number of non‐hydrogen atoms. [b] The lipophilic ligand efficiency (LLE) was calculated as (−logIC 50)−clogP.